> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:12 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Why isn't this as simple as:
>
> 1) Create an f37-multilib-build build tag with all supported arches + i686,
> and an f37-multilib{,-candidate} build targets to use it (with destination tag
> of f37-updates-candidate);
>
> 2) Drop i686 f
On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:12 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Detailed Description ==
>
> Fedora does no longer ship any deliverables for i686, not even RPM
> repositories for i686 are published any longer. The kernel package
> itself also [[Changes/Stop Building i686 Kernels|dropped support for
> i68
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:41 AM Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:26:54 +0100
> Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>
> > On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote:
> > > May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal
> > > for debugging purposes.
> >
> > Telnet is an extremel
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 09:06:01AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> So I guess this is the part I don't really understand (and I guess why I
> don't see this proposal as a "win") - how is i686 painful to package
> maintainers for non-delivered packages? Maybe I'm just missing
> something, but what caus
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Alex wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have seen in https://lwn.net/Articles/887313/ that you plan to remove the
> "telnet" protocol from curl-minimal.
>
> I use `curl -v telnet://` almost every day for debugging purpose just
> because curl is in the most systems by
Dear all,
Just a heads-up that Folly and packages built against it are mostly*
switched to build using Clang for the time being, when compiled on
Fedora 36 and above.
* the exception is watchman, which needs some work to get the latest
version to build because upstream started porting some func
On 04. 03. 22 12:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Pythonistas,
I intent to upgrade pytest in Rawhide to 7.0.x next week.
Building it now.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 19:28 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 17:51, Simo Sorce wrote:
> [...]
> > Also I always resented that I need two separate accounts to deal with
> > Fedora packages,
>
> It's been possible to log in with FAS credentials (automatica
On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 17:51, Simo Sorce wrote:
[...]
> Also I always resented that I need two separate accounts to deal with
> Fedora packages,
It's been possible to log in with FAS credentials (automatically if you
have an active Kerberos ticket) into bugzilla for quite some time now.
I s
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Alex wrote:
> I have seen in https://lwn.net/Articles/887313/ that you plan to remove the
> "telnet" protocol from curl-minimal.
> I use `curl -v telnet://` almost every day for debugging purpose just
> because curl is in the most systems by default ins
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 09:44 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
> >
> > As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> > release
> > cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up wi
On 10. 03. 22 17:33, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters wrote:
Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora, personally
I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
I'm not sure how active the use of Red Hat Bugzilla is outside of the
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
> Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora,
> personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
I'm not sure how active the use of Red Hat Bugzilla is outside of the
distribution space. I have no concerns
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters wrote:
> Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora,
> personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
Yes, I personally think gitlab.com would be a good replacement for
src.fedoraproject.org and bugzilla.redhat.co
Hi
While updating gnome-backgrounds, I realised that all the backgrounds
were licensed under CC-BY-SA, rather than the specified GPLv2, and after
checking with upstream, I updated the License field accordingly.
Cheers
--
https://amigadave.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:05 PM Davide Cavalca via CentOS-devel
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
> >
> > As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> > release
> > cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/161 (aarch64), 8/229 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220309.n.0):
ID: 1167927 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1167927
ID: 1167938 T
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64), 2/15 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220309.0):
ID: 1168236 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1168236
ID: 1168248 Test: aarch6
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
>
> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the n
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have an F36 Beta RC. As
a result, F36 Beta is NO-GO by default and today's Go/No-Go meeting is
cancelled.
The next Fedora Linux 36 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at 1700
UTC on Thursday 17 March in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for the
"target da
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 4:01 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
(snip)
> == Scope ==
> Change owners
> * we will simiply stop building i686 pkg in rawhide
>
> Other developers
> * may notice the multilib i686 java missing.
> * it is up to them to drop i686 builds or to povide workaround (if
Ah, didn't see that on the page. Thanks!
Le jeu. 10 mars 2022, à 09 h 24, Fabio Valentini a
écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 3:20 PM Ben Beasley
> wrote:
> >
> > Since icedtea-web was orphaned for 6+ weeks, it was retired. You must
> > therefore follow [1]. Note that:
> >
> > Retired Fedo
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 3:20 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> Since icedtea-web was orphaned for 6+ weeks, it was retired. You must
> therefore follow [1]. Note that:
>
> Retired Fedora packages (rawhide branch retired) require a
> re-review if they are retired for more than eight weeks or if there
Since icedtea-web was orphaned for 6+ weeks, it was retired. You must
therefore follow [1]. Note that:
Retired Fedora packages (rawhide branch retired) require a
re-review if they are retired for more than eight weeks or if there is
no previous review of the package.
This package has a p
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:07 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Thanks for your feedback!
> The word "encourage" is rather weird here. I am not a native speaker, but that
> sound to me like we are agitating for active removals. Like we go to the
> packagers and ask them: Could oyu please drop i686 from your
Good morning all,
First, I apologize if dumb questions are in this post -- still wet behind
the ears when it comes to packaging.
I was wondering what was needed to unretire a package, this one
specifically: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/icedtea-web
It seems to still be developed (
https://g
OLD: Fedora-36-20220309.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220310.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 23
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 142.42 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Thu, Mar 10 2022 at 11:55:39 AM +0100, Alex
wrote:
I have seen in https://lwn.net/Articles/887313/ that you plan to
remove the
"telnet" protocol from curl-minimal.
Next up: I see you're planning to remove the brotli compression
support. I think that's actually used along with gzip for HTT
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:10:17 +0100
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 13:47, Alex wrote:
> > Here a example test. I know that this could be also done with https but
> > it's a understandable example, IMHO.
>
> Better example:
> openssl s_client -connect example.org:443
>
Agree whe
On 10/03/2022 12:41, Paul Howarth wrote:
I wonder, do you have the "telnet" program installed on your machine(s)?
No. All my services use TLS.
openssl s_client -connect example.org:443
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel
On 10/03/2022 13:47, Alex wrote:
Here a example test. I know that this could be also done with https but it's a
understandable example, IMHO.
Better example:
openssl s_client -connect example.org:443
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:41:15 +
Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:26:54 +0100
> Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>
> > On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote:
> > > May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal
> > > for debugging purposes.
> >
> > Telnet is an ex
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 7:09 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2022 11:51, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Everyone has their own conflicting idea of what is 'minimal'. There's
> >> no nice way to solve this problem in Fedora without c
On 10/03/2022 11:51, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Everyone has their own conflicting idea of what is 'minimal'. There's
no nice way to solve this problem in Fedora without curl upstream
supporting dlopen modules per protoocol, allowing us to packa
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2022-03-11 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10133/
___
devel maili
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:26:54PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote:
> > > May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal for
> > > debugging purposes.
> >
> > Telnet is an
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:26:54PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote:
> > May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal for
> > debugging purposes.
>
> Telnet is an extremely vulnerable protocol. It must be disable.
>
> If you need it,
Am 10.03.22 um 12:26 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote:
May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal for
debugging purposes.
Telnet is an extremely vulnerable protocol. It must be disable.
It should not be used on a regular basis, but
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:26:54 +0100
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote:
> > May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal
> > for debugging purposes.
>
> Telnet is an extremely vulnerable protocol. It must be disable.
>
> If you need it, you
On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote:
May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal for
debugging purposes.
Telnet is an extremely vulnerable protocol. It must be disable.
If you need it, you can always install libcurl-full.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.o
Hi.
I have seen in https://lwn.net/Articles/887313/ that you plan to remove the
"telnet" protocol from curl-minimal.
I use `curl -v telnet://` almost every day for debugging purpose just
because curl is in the most systems by default installed.
I know that there are some other tools like soca
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220309.0):
ID: 1167584 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220309.0):
ID: 1167568 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
* Ron Olson:
> Building swiftlang on F36/Rawhide results in a a failure that, boiled down to
> its essence, appears to be:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/lto-llvm-4fd0b1.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against
> undefined symbol `__libc_stack_end' can not be used when making a shared
> object; recompile wit
On 09. 03. 22 18:05, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
(...)
OK then, I can +1 that, but please: Make that more obvious in the proposal.
Honest question: How do I do that? Do you have a suggestion?
> Encourage Dropping Unused / Leaf Packages on i686
45 matches
Mail list logo
