No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220409.0):
ID: 1218816 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220409.0):
ID: 1218832 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220408.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 60
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 768.69 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 4/10/22 09:56, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
Maybe I should try adapting my code, so that it finds the GRUB BIOS boot
partition and loads it?
This would be a nice stunt for which we would have to find a use case.
As stated yesterday, the GRUB El Torito image contains a c
OLD: Fedora-36-20220409.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On 4/10/22 05:50, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
Moving past the Big Three(tm), the actual
cloud providers that matter from a Fedora context are the smaller
outfits that principally serve Linux users. These are companies like
DigitalOcean, Linode (Akam
Hi,
Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
> I imagine it is like those polyglot programs, that are simultaneously valid
> in several totally different programming languages:
Yep. A boot-everywhere ISO for x86 is quite like that.
Every firmware variant can see in it what it expects.
> Actually, I have already
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 10:51 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > Moving past the Big Three(tm), the actual
> > cloud providers that matter from a Fedora context are the smaller
> > outfits that principally serve Linux users. These are companies lik
Thank you very much Mamoru! Why don't you submit your patch to upstream
repository, so you get the credit? We will need to patch such thing
upstream anyways!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 2:23 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Michel Alexandre Salim writes:
>
> > - as I stated, there are offers to help with getting syslinux replaced
> > with GRUB. what I've not stated originally is Chris Murphy brought up
> > protective MBR and switching all new installs to i
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 10/231 (x86_64), 20/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220408.n.2):
ID: 1218926 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso de
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Possible solution is to check if compiler (target) supports -msse3 and
> -mavx first, and it they are not supported, don't pass them to CPPFLAGS on
> AC_CHECK_DECL
It shall be noted that unconditionally compiling with these flags on x86_64
will make the program fail to run
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 16/161 (aarch64), 6/229 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220409.n.0):
ID: 1219385 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1219385
ID: 1219399 Test: aarch64 Serv
On 4/10/22 16:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 10:51 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
Moving past the Big Three(tm), the actual
cloud providers that matter from a Fedora context are the smaller
outfits that principally serve Linux users.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 10:27:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> And we can take incremental steps to get there, even now:
>
> 1. Switch Anaconda to default to GPT even on BIOS setups
> 2. Drop syslinux and use GRUB everywhere
> 3. Configure new installations to always do hybrid boot installations
>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:43:02AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 06.04.22 07:33, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Irrespective of this change, I would flat-out oppose moving to
> > sd-boot. In any case, you can't use sd-boot for live media.
> >
> > If we were going to move to
On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 13:41, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 08/04/2022 09:54, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > I already did. Isn't that what I wrote?
>
> Can you post their answer?
Yes:
```
On VPS, we do not provide images with UEFI enabled.
```
They support UEFI on their P
On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 19:14, Brian C. Lane wrote:
[...]
> So like I said yesterday, I'll look into switching to use grub2 for
> Fedora 37, assuming grub2 continues to support BIOS.
Thank you very much! From my side, I've found another BIOS-only machine
in my junkyard and I'm willing to put b
On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote:
[...]
> Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'm still having bad
> experience with UEFI on x86_64 now. Out of my 3 machines I only have 1
> system that works fine with UEFI. And my parents' laptop was purchased
> 2 years ago and the UE
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 4:37 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote:
> [...]
> > Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'm still having bad
> > experience with UEFI on x86_64 now. Out of my 3 machines I only have 1
> > system that
On 4/8/22 13:28, Björn Persson wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7 2022 at 12:30:42 PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher
>> wrote:
>>> Well, it *could* grow an interface to some of the password wallet
>>> services that support TOTP or HOTP codes (like Bitwarden, Lastpass,
>>> 1password, etc
On 4/10/22 16:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 4:37 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote:
[...]
Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'm still having bad
experience with UEFI on x86_64 now. Out of my 3 machines I on
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 7:08 PM Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
>
> On 4/10/22 16:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 4:37 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> >> On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'
On 3/30/22 09:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:44 AM NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022, 08:34 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hi,
Fedora currently ships Wine 7.3 released February 25th, 2022.
Wine 7.4, released March 11th, started to require a 'llvm-mingw' compiler for
Hello all,
Since this conversation several months ago I've been working with the
Wine maintainer on implementing a solution upstream that is compatible
with our requirements and the pretty much universal desire by packagers
to avoid system library imports. I believe I've found a solution that
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 1:27 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Windows 11 *does not matter* here.
(Windows) Desktop as a Service (DaaS)[0] may
change that faster than some expect (or faster
than some hope). There is a large push by
some orgs to move services off premise
into the cloud (for a number of sta
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:06 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 1:27 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > Windows 11 *does not matter* here.
>
> (Windows) Desktop as a Service (DaaS)[0] may
> change that faster than some expect (or faster
> than some hope). There is a large push by
> s
# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-04-11
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hey testers! We have 7 proposed Final blockers and 2 proposed Final freeze
exception issues to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday. We
also have Go/No-Go coming up o
28 matches
Mail list logo
