That will create a very big performance hit, and disabling SMT will half the
amount of threads. On the new CPUs with E and P cores, this can significantly
decrease performance.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
The issue is that in %prep, %buildsubdir is not defined, so the definition
of %_package_note_file, which uses %buildsubdir, has a different value than
in %build and later. Generally the best solution is to move the step that
tries to make use of the package no
Hello, Thomas.
Thanks for your patience. I would've gotten the results sooner,
but life got in the way.
On Tuesday, 26 April 2022 at 23:18, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
> If test_oldlayout.iso does not boot, then i am quite clueless.
I'm afraid that this is the case. I'll try to re-do the ISO man
On 5/18/22 23:15, Hellosway Here via devel wrote:
> Add `slab_nomerge init_on_alloc=1 init_on_free=1 page_alloc.shuffle=1 pti=on
> randomize_kstack_offset=on vsyscall=none ` as default kernel command line
> arguments. This can help prevent local exploits by making it harder to
> exploit the kern
On 5/20/22 21:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 9:08 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 8:13 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>> For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
>>> regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*].
For `slab_nomerge`, it can lead to very slight increase of kernel memory.
`init_on_alloc=1` has a almost no performance impact, it is under 1% and is
usually within standard error, but there is bug with zfs that can make zfs
slower. `init_on_free=1` can be measured and is around 7-20% under cert
On Fri, 2022-05-20 at 19:34 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Minimal raw-xz armhfp
>
> Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
> 7 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing
> openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 08:16:22AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I'm taking a rather boring F35 SRPM and attempting to rebuild it in mock for
> F36.
>
> Its stock configure script, that tries to test-compile conftest.c fails
> thusly:
>
> gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -gr
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 42/231 (x86_64), 24/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
Owen,
Thanks for explaining the situation with umask. I'd noticed the
discrepancy between login/non-login shells and wondered what was
going on.
>It seems like we need to do one of two things:
>
> - Go back to the old behavior, maybe by using the usergroups option to
>pam_umask and removing the
I'm taking a rather boring F35 SRPM and attempting to rebuild it in mock for
F36.
Its stock configure script, that tries to test-compile conftest.c fails
thusly:
gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -
pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_S
On 21/05/2022 13:22, Jiri Vanek wrote:
shim?
Built on Koji from sources as shim-unsigned, then uploaded to Microsoft
for signing.
This is a special legal case, just like openh264 and Cisco.
Both of them built from sources on Fedora infra.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.o
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 7:28 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/20/22 14:57, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 20/05/2022 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> wait, what? What do you mean? And waht give you this impression?
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MoveFedoraJDKsToBecomePortableJDKs:
>
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220520.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220521.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 34
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On 5/20/22 14:57, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 20/05/2022 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
wait, what? What do you mean? And waht give you this impression?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MoveFedoraJDKsToBecomePortableJDKs:
> Make the normal rpms to not built jdk, but to repack the portable r
On 5/20/22 14:57, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 20/05/2022 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
wait, what? What do you mean? And waht give you this impression?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MoveFedoraJDKsToBecomePortableJDKs:
> Make the normal rpms to not built jdk, but to repack the portable r
It is not so bad. and I definitely do not feel offended or even close to.
Many languages have very interesting words which go far beyond true/false
untrue/not false/ correct/incorrect right/left/lie
Thus saying many languages can not match to other langunages meaning of simple
true/false right
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220520.0):
ID: 1274992 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
18 matches
Mail list logo
