On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Can anyone tell me why python-astroid gets built as "UNKNOWN" on EPEL9?
Executing(%generate_buildrequires): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mum5to
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd astroid-2.12.1
+ echo pyproject-rpm-macros
+ echo python3-devel
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-55ddc1978f
rubygem-tzinfo-1.2.10-1.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-69c4ed93d1
ntfs-3g-2022.5.17-1.el7
2
Can anyone tell me why python-astroid gets built as "UNKNOWN" on EPEL9?
Executing(%generate_buildrequires): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mum5to
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd astroid-2.12.1
+ echo pyproject-rpm-macros
+ echo python3-devel
+ echo 'python3dist(pip) >= 19'
+ echo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116427
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118082
Bug ID: 2118082
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.53 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On 8/13/22 08:04, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> martin luther wrote:
>> should we implement https://github.com/GrapheneOS/hardened_malloc/
>> it is hardened memory allocate it will increase the security of fedora
>> according to the graphene os team it can be ported to linux as well need
>> to
On 8/13/22 15:23, Jerry James wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 4:11 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 8/13/22 10:49, Peter Boy wrote:
I’m just testing the new 20220813 branch end encounter several issues.
Branch of what? I'm assuming F37 or rawhide.
One of them is image factory, which I need
> Hi,
>
> I’m just testing the new 20220813 branch end encounter several issues.
>
> One of them is image factory, which I need to install to test building a
> server image.
>
> # dnf install imagefactory
> Last metadata expiration check: 1:35:08 ago on Sat 13 A
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 4:11 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 8/13/22 10:49, Peter Boy wrote:
> > I’m just testing the new 20220813 branch end encounter several issues.
>
> Branch of what? I'm assuming F37 or rawhide.
>
> > One of them is image factory, which I need to
On 8/13/22 10:49, Peter Boy wrote:
I’m just testing the new 20220813 branch end encounter several issues.
Branch of what? I'm assuming F37 or rawhide.
One of them is image factory, which I need to install to test building a server
image.
- - - - - - - - - - <
# dnf install imagefact
On 2022-08-11 00:27, Dan Horák wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 23:25:57 -0700
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
The scratch build specifically failed on aarch64 architecture [1] with
the following line when updating to embree 3.13.4 (not yet committed):
cc1plus: error: unrecognized
Hi,
I’m just testing the new 20220813 branch end encounter several issues.
One of them is image factory, which I need to install to test building a server
image.
> - - - - - - - - - - <
# dnf install imagefactory
Last metadata expiration check: 1:35:08 ago on Sat 13 Aug 2022 05:57:29 P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115572
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(re...@seznam.cz)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f
On 8/12/22 11:35 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:00 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
It turns out that there is a bug in wxPython whereby it installs an error
handler that should not be installed by a library [1]. KiCad can work around
that by
IMO it would be worthwhile doing test builds to see how many of the dependent
packages actually still use external asio.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022, at 1:04 PM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Sway SIG is looking for ideas and opinions on the name for the Sway
> OSTree spin.
> You can read more at
> https://fale.io/blog/2022/08/12/fedora-sway-ostree-spin-name
Just my 2 cents: I still don't think the
martin luther wrote:
> should we implement https://github.com/GrapheneOS/hardened_malloc/
> it is hardened memory allocate it will increase the security of fedora
> according to the graphene os team it can be ported to linux as well need
> to look at it
There are several questions that come up:
*
OLD: Fedora-37-20220812.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220813.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 57
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 16.58 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Leigh Scott wrote:
> Shouldn't asio package be retired as it's provided by boost-devel?
>
> /usr/include/boost/asio/
It is unfortunately not a drop-in replacement:
https://think-async.com/Asio/AsioAndBoostAsio.html
Kevin Kofler
___
devel
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 37 Branched 20220813.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
should we implement https://github.com/GrapheneOS/hardened_malloc/
it is hardened memory allocate it will increase the security of fedora
according to the graphene os team it can be ported to linux as well need to
look at it
___
devel mailing list --
Yes, this was the idea, but since asio still exists (and gets updated) outside
the boost library, it would require convincing upstreams and/or patching the
dependent packages to ensure they are importing the boost one.
Fale
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022, at 12:19, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Shouldn't asio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118006
Bug ID: 2118006
Summary: perl-Test-Warn-0.37 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-Warn
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118006
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
GenericError: File upload failed:
cli-build/1660386531.889619.LZxLJXXV/perl-Test-Warn-0.37-1.fc36.src.rpm
Traceback:
File
Shouldn't asio package be retired as it's provided by boost-devel?
/usr/include/boost/asio/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Am 13.08.22 um 10:29 schrieb Julian Sikorski:
Dear list,
does anybody know how to contact asio maintainers? The asio version in
our repositories is quite old and the bug asking for an update has been
unanswered for more than 2 years:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117996
I
Dear list,
does anybody know how to contact asio maintainers? The asio version in
our repositories is quite old and the bug asking for an update has been
unanswered for more than 2 years:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117996
I have filed non-responsive maintainer bugs for all
28 matches
Mail list logo
