Re: fkinit -u instructions

V Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 04:35:22PM +, Kenneth Goldman napsal(a): > An explanation of the Kerberos ticket - why it's needed, It's written there: "Koji uses Kerberos for authentication". > how long it lasts, what fails when it expires, etc. - would be useful. > These details are in a linked

MDAPI Rewrite - Out Now in Production

Hello everyone, I hope you are doing well. I wanted to let you know that the rewritten MDAPI is out now in production. You can find the production deployment here[1]. The announcement of the testing deployment made on the staging environment was made previously[2][3]. Please reach out to the

[Bug 2158089] Add perl-Locale-Codes to EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158089 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Locale-Codes-3.72-3.el

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-855ba97187 shapelib-1.3.0-3.el7 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8535da02dc radare2-5.8.2-1.el7 3

[Bug 2125015] perl-Gtk3 EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 16:44 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >> Peter Robinson wrote: >> > It was decided years ago that all desktops would have some Fedora >> > similarities, backgrounds, browser etc. >> >> If and when that was decided, that was without involving

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

> Is there another argument to fedpkg? fedpkg has a --name argument, you can try using that. Alternatively, if you're just taking your first steps with packaging, you can try: $ rpmbuild -bs path/to/your.spec $ mock path/to/file-created-by-previous-command.srpm This will first build an SRPM

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230214.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-38-20230213.n.1 NEW: Fedora-38-20230214.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 7 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 52 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 26.83 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: Enabling plymouth on livemedia-creator iso creation

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 5:19 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > Way back in the day... :) livemedia-creator inherited an '--omit > plymouth' from the boot.iso creation process. The boot.iso was changed a > few years later, but lmc kept it. Fred noticed this and submitted >

Re: Enabling plymouth on livemedia-creator iso creation

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 02:19:15PM -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote: > Way back in the day... :) livemedia-creator inherited an '--omit > plymouth' from the boot.iso creation process. The boot.iso was changed a > few years later, but lmc kept it. Fred noticed this and submitted >

Enabling plymouth on livemedia-creator iso creation

Way back in the day... :) livemedia-creator inherited an '--omit plymouth' from the boot.iso creation process. The boot.iso was changed a few years later, but lmc kept it. Fred noticed this and submitted https://github.com/weldr/lorax/pull/1307 to conditionally fix it. But I think we can just

F38 Change complete (100% complete) deadline in one week

As a reminder, F38 Changes should be 100% complete by Tuesday 21 February. Change owners can indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracker to the ON_QA state. F38 will enter beta freeze on that date. More schedule details are available at

F38 Change complete (100% complete) deadline in one week

As a reminder, F38 Changes should be 100% complete by Tuesday 21 February. Change owners can indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracker to the ON_QA state. F38 will enter beta freeze on that date. More schedule details are available at

Re: Small rant: installer environment size

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 06:40:05PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > I'm still curious about the impact of glibc-all-langpacks on > download/image size. FWIW here is the discussion that happened when that was added: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312607 Brian -- Brian C. Lane

RE: TSS maintainer volunteer

From: Peter Robinson Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 4:57 PM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSS maintainer volunteer jQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:16 PM Kenneth Goldman wrote: I have a fedora account. How

fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_ GNU_Hello/ Working through the basic tutorial there: fedpkg --release f37 mockbuild fails with Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl Failed to get ns from Git url or pushurl [repeats forever] How does

Re: libindi upgrade to 2.0.0 and soname bump

On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 19:13:39 CET Mattia Verga wrote: > To the kstars maintainers: I can take care to upgrade the package, if > you want (it's just a simple version bump and upload new sources). > > To the stellarium maintainers: I will wait for a patch from upstream > before pushing the

Re: fkinit -u instructions

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 06:10:39PM +, Kenneth Goldman wrote: -Original Message- From: Clemens Lang Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 12:59 PM To: Development discussions related to Fedora >> Someone posted that the prompt for an OTP can be ignored and that the >> Fedora password

Re: libindi upgrade to 2.0.0 and soname bump

Il 04/02/23 18:41, Mattia Verga ha scritto: > Hello folks, > > in a week or so (after f38 branch) I plan to upgrade libindi core (AKA > indilib), indi-3rdparty-libraries and indi-3rdparty-drivers to 2.0.0. > This will make the soname bump to 2 and will need the two dependent > packages, kstars and

RE: fkinit -u instructions

> -Original Message- > From: Clemens Lang > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 12:59 PM > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > >> Someone posted that the prompt for an OTP can be ignored and that the > >> Fedora password is enough. > > > > IIRC, if you *have* an OTP, you have to

Re: fkinit -u instructions

Hi Adam, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 16:35 +, Kenneth Goldman wrote: Yes, much better, thanks. Someone posted that the prompt for an OTP can be ignored and that the Fedora password is enough. IIRC, if you *have* an OTP, you have to include it. If you *don't* have

Re: fkinit -u instructions

On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 16:35 +, Kenneth Goldman wrote: > Yes, much better, thanks. > > Someone posted that the prompt for an OTP can be ignored and that the Fedora > password is enough. IIRC, if you *have* an OTP, you have to include it. If you *don't* have one, of course you just put your

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 16:44 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Peter Robinson wrote: > > It was decided years ago that all desktops would have some Fedora > > similarities, backgrounds, browser etc. > > If and when that was decided, that was without involving the maintainers of > the Spins.

Re: Small rant: installer environment size

* Adam Williamson: > On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 09:40 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Adam Williamson: >> >> > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 07:57 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> > > * Adam Williamson: >> > > >> > > > 1. /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive , from glibc-all-langpacks - this is >> > > > 224M

Re: Small rant: installer environment size

On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 09:40 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Adam Williamson: > > > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 07:57 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > * Adam Williamson: > > > > > > > 1. /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive , from glibc-all-langpacks - this is > > > > 224M uncompressed. A quick test just

RE: fkinit -u instructions

Yes, much better, thanks. Someone posted that the prompt for an OTP can be ignored and that the Fedora password is enough. An explanation of the Kerberos ticket - why it's needed, how long it lasts, what fails when it expires, etc. - would be useful. > -Original Message- > From: Petr

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

On Friday, 10 February 2023 15:11:19 CET Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Friday, 10 February 2023 14:47:19 CET Ben Cotton wrote: > > > 3. kwin — kwin_wayland often crashed when used as the sddm Wayland > > compositor and logging out of Plasma resulting in a black screen — NEW > > ACTION:

Re: fkinit -u instructions

V Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 04:04:06PM +0100, blinxen napsal(a): > > 1. fas_id is not defined.  Is it my local Linux user ID, my Fedora login > ID, or something else? > > "fas_id" is your FAS (Fedora Account) name, for me this would be "blinxen". > > > Is password my local or Fedora password? > > It

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-02-15 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #topic aloha

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > As a browser maintainer itself, I'm very supportive of the Falkon > project. I consider it to be KDE's equivalent of Epiphany, sort of a > sister project, more or less. Agreed. I also think that the "Workstation Edition" should be shipping Epiphany instead of Firefox

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

Peter Robinson wrote: > It was decided years ago that all desktops would have some Fedora > similarities, backgrounds, browser etc. If and when that was decided, that was without involving the maintainers of the Spins. I know because I was directly involved with maintaining the KDE Spin at the

Re: fkinit -u instructions

Hi Kenneth > 1. fas_id is not defined.  Is it my local Linux user ID, my Fedora login ID, or something else? "fas_id" is your FAS (Fedora Account) name, for me this would be "blinxen". > Is password my local or Fedora password? It is your FAS (Fedora Account) password > What would my OTP

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

As a browser maintainer itself, I'm very supportive of the Falkon project. I consider it to be KDE's equivalent of Epiphany, sort of a sister project, more or less. On Tue, Feb 14 2023 at 03:44:06 AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Even Qt 5 QtWebEngine (considered obsolete by Qt) still

fkinit -u instructions

I'm working through the Packager instructions at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Installing_Packager _Tools/ There is a step: $ fkinit -u 1. fas_id is not defined. Is it my local Linux user ID, my Fedora login ID, or something else? 2. When I try it, I get

Re: openexr: Any s390x people in the house?

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 3:08 PM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:19:38 -0600 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > I currently have to disable tests for s390x[1] (and ppc64le) for likely > > endianess issues. > > > > Troubleshooting these is more than a little outside of my wheelhouse. > > > >

Re: openexr: Any s390x people in the house?

On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:19:38 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: > I currently have to disable tests for s390x[1] (and ppc64le) for likely > endianess issues. > > Troubleshooting these is more than a little outside of my wheelhouse. > > I hate keeping them disabled so I wanted to see if anyone could

Today is the Fedora 38 "Retire FTI packages in NEW state" moment, but it's (close to) no-op

The only packages that would be retired are orphaned for 5 weeks already and will be retired in (less than) a week. I decided not to bother with them individually and let them be retired naturally. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2140817,2140818,2140819 -- Miro Hrončok --

Re: openexr: Any s390x people in the house?

On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 08:21, Richard Shaw wrote: > I currently have to disable tests for s390x[1] (and ppc64le) for likely > endianess issues. > > Well if it is failing for the same reason on s390x (big endian) and ppc64le (little endian).. I don't think the problem is all about endian parts.

openexr: Any s390x people in the house?

I currently have to disable tests for s390x[1] (and ppc64le) for likely endianess issues. Troubleshooting these is more than a little outside of my wheelhouse. I hate keeping them disabled so I wanted to see if anyone could spare a few cycles to investigate. Thanks, Richard [1]

[Bug 2169177] perl-Prima-1.67001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169177 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- It fails a test on s390x: # Failed test 'one pixel is red' # at t/Object/Application.t line 58. # Failed test 'another is green' # at t/Object/Application.t line 60. # Looks like you failed 2 tests

[Bug 2169177] perl-Prima-1.67001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169177 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 15:09 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 1:56 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: > > > > Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > I did a check on some.. I only downloaded 3 isos so this isn't a > > > complete > > > set. > > > > I think trying to track down 11 to 16

procps-ng-4.0.2 rebase with new library and its name change

Hello, I've made a rebase to the newest procps-ng, which had switched to its newlib branch completely. This brings a massively-rewritten library, formerly libprocps.so. The library changed its name to libproc2. For this reason, I created a side-tag f39-build-side-63116. Please ping me any time

[Bug 2169177] perl-Prima-1.67001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169177 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

[Bug 2125015] perl-Gtk3 EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125015 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from

Re: Fedora Linux 38 branched

On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 10:46, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On pátek 10. února 2023 11:38:25 CET Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 11:35, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:27 AM Iñaki Ucar > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 09:44, Jakub Kadlcik

Re: Fedora Linux 38 branched

On pátek 10. února 2023 11:38:25 CET Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 11:35, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:27 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 09:44, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Tomas, > > > > thank you for the

bmon license corrected

Hi, While doing the SPDX change, I noticed that the former bmon license was specified as "BSD and GPLv2" which is not correct. The only files in the source mentioning GPL are generated by autoconf. Everything else is licensed under BSD and MIT, which translates to "BSD-2-Clause and MIT"...

Re: Small rant: installer environment size

* Adam Williamson: > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 07:57 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Adam Williamson: >> >> > 1. /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive , from glibc-all-langpacks - this is >> > 224M uncompressed. A quick test just compressing the file with xz on my >> > system shows it compresses to