On 2023-02-25 21:52, Gordon Messmer wrote:
But, with regard to the bug: offhand, if this is a bug, it seems like
a bug in the koji CI scripts and not in rpminspect, doesn't it? Where
would I find the definition of the
"fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis" stage for review?
I fee
On 2023-02-22 02:47, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:48:26AM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
First, the bug. From these results, it looks like rpminspect is only
comparing the primary package to the old build. I do see a result for the
package "nghttp2", but I don't see an rpmins
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> I would personally not miss --security, but what is really useful is the
> --advisory=… flag that used to be implemented by the same plugin. (They
> are now both built in in DNF.) That is invaluable to test individual
> updates from updates-testing. I would consider
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 12:12:41PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2023-02-21 12:48, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > I was asked to weigh in onhttps://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a
> > priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere...
> >
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners can
> > > indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracke
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners can
> > indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracker to the ON_QA state. F38
> > enters beta freeze today. Any up
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 04:30:31PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 08:41:14PM -0500, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \
> > > --e
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 08:41:14PM -0500, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> >
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 10:20 AM Sandro wrote:
>
> Greetings everyone,
>
> TL;DR
> Will there be AVIF (AV1) support for applications using libheif in Fedora?
>
> A while ago I stumbled upon AVIF files not being supported by
> applications (gThumb, ImageMagick, GIMP) in Fedora [1].
>
> It appears t
Greetings everyone,
TL;DR
Will there be AVIF (AV1) support for applications using libheif in Fedora?
A while ago I stumbled upon AVIF files not being supported by
applications (gThumb, ImageMagick, GIMP) in Fedora [1].
It appears that the applications mentioned have switched to libheif for
A
OLD: Fedora-38-20230224.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230225.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230224.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230225.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 115
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 370.73 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
12 matches
Mail list logo
