The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
57 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f44d817bc9
chromium-113.0.5672.63-1.el8
6
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7f7029b90d
tcpreplay-4.4.3-3.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
python-opensearch-py-2.2.0-1.el7
Details about
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 1:34 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Owen Taylor:
>
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 9:48 AM Florian Weimer
> wrote:
> >
> > * Aoife Moloney:
> >
> > > There are two types of Flatpak containers -
> > > runtimes - which contain unmodified Fedora packages,
> > > and
On Fri, May 12, 2023, 1:03 PM Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 10/05/23 12:54, Aoife Moloney ha scritto:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksWithoutModules
> >
> >
> I've never tried to make a flatpak because I was scared by the need of
> firstly
On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even a
request for additional information.
Tags have been added to the ticket. So, it has come up in one of the
meetings. Supposedly, no-one has found the time yet to
* Owen Taylor:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 9:48 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Aoife Moloney:
>
> > There are two types of Flatpak containers -
> > runtimes - which contain unmodified Fedora packages,
> > and applications - which contain Fedora packages rebuilt to relocate
> > them from /usr
We have submitted the new Rust packaging toolchain to EPEL 9:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fecd6bbae1
Please help test and provide karma.
This update has been in epel9-next for a couple months now,
but we can push it to epel9 now that RHEL 9.2 that contains python3.11
Il 10/05/23 12:54, Aoife Moloney ha scritto:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksWithoutModules
>
>
I've never tried to make a flatpak because I was scared by the need of
firstly build modules and I'm really happy to see this change moving on.
However, there's something I can't
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 03:59:37PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 12.05.23 15:48, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > Well, not completely - my paraview build in the side tag has not yet
> > completed:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101035225
> >
> > Do I submit a
On 12.05.23 15:48, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Well, not completely - my paraview build in the side tag has not yet
completed:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101035225
Do I submit a separate update for that once it is done?
Whops sorry, got over-excited seeing the x86_64
On 5/12/23 04:38, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 11.05.23 05:42, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm preparing the gdal-3.7.0 update which carries a soname bump. Il
build it in the f39-build-side-67536 side-tag, and rebuild the
following dependencies:
GMT
mapserver
liblas
python-fiona
postgis
On 11.05.23 05:42, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm preparing the gdal-3.7.0 update which carries a soname bump. Il
build it in the f39-build-side-67536 side-tag, and rebuild the
following dependencies:
GMT
mapserver
liblas
python-fiona
postgis
merkaartor
R-rgdal
bes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230511.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230512.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 127
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 26.24 MiB
Size of dropped packages
corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Update Makefile.PL to not use
Module::Install::DSL` that you are following:
``
Jitka, I do not understand the part below of your patch. Could you elaborate?
# diff --git a/perl-Class-Autouse.spec b/perl-Class-Autouse.spec
index c0f9d92..3206101 100644
14 matches
Mail list logo
