On 04/07/2023 05:24, Tom Stellard wrote:
/usr/include/OpenImageIO/detail/fmt/core.h:1691:7: error: static
assertion failed: Cannot format an argument. To make type T formattable
provide a formatter specialization: https://fmt.dev/latest/api.html#udt
This seems like a failure unrelated to
On 7/3/23 19:37, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 2023-07-03 17:08, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 7/3/23 11:31, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I attempt to build openshadinglanguage with llvm15 as upstream has yet to
support LLVM 16. Can someone have a pointed how to set a cmake parameter for
On 2023-07-03 17:08, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 7/3/23 11:31, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I attempt to build openshadinglanguage with llvm15 as upstream has
yet to support LLVM 16. Can someone have a pointed how to set a cmake
parameter for llvm15 and its bitecode validation?
See the
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 7:15AM +1000, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:44:34PM +0300, ijaaskelai...@outlook.com wrote:
> > Kind regards, The Improvement Skeleton.
>
> Please show the exact steps you use to build the cups package and the
> exact error message you get.
>
>
Hi Zdenek,
Regarding packaging pappl-retrofit and printer applications, looking at the
pappl-retrofit based snaps from Till Kamppeter, I suspect the existing Fedora
pappl package might need to be modified.
For example, extract from ps-printer-app's snapcraft.yaml file which modifies
pappl's
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c5ad3565aa
libmodsecurity-3.0.9-2.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-560bc00f33
golang-1.19.10-1.el7
3
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-81803bf20b
chromium-114.0.5735.198-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
classpathless-compiler-2.2-1.el8
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-64db16429d
chromium-114.0.5735.198-1.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
classpathless-compiler-2.2-1.el9
On 7/3/23 11:31, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I attempt to build openshadinglanguage with llvm15 as upstream has yet to
support LLVM 16. Can someone have a pointed how to set a cmake parameter for
llvm15 and its bitecode validation?
See the spec file on:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219483
Bug ID: 2219483
Summary: perl-Sentinel-0.07 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sentinel
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:36 PM Jiří Konečný wrote:
>
> Hi, see my replies below.
>
> 2. července 2023 23:56:59 SELČ, Demi Marie Obenour
> napsal:
> >On 6/27/23 05:00, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> >> On 6/27/23 10:40, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ok, so can you provide some instructions for
Hi, see my replies below.
2. července 2023 23:56:59 SELČ, Demi Marie Obenour
napsal:
>On 6/27/23 05:00, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
>> On 6/27/23 10:40, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, so can you provide some instructions for how to make this work ?
>> I guess it would be something like add the
Hi
3. července 2023 18:57:39 SELČ, Michael Catanzaro
napsal:
>On Mon, Jul 3 2023 at 12:32:02 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>> Why is that? WebKitGTK+ is one of those packages that one should only
>> ship if one is willing to take every update from upstream, but my
>> understanding is
Hi Tomáš,
I have been looking at this one:
> python-metar jdekloe
and I think it needs to be fixed upstream before it can be build for
python3.12. Of course the failing tests can be disabled, but that may
just hide that the module is crippled.
So I opened this issue upstream:
Am 03.07.23 um 18:07 schrieb Simon de Vlieger:
On 7/3/23 13:46, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
It is the core of the problem esp. big US companies tend to ignore.
May-be you guys are not aware of there are tendencies to legally
prohibit such "cloud solutions" in many countries?
It's generally not
Hello team,
I attempt to build openshadinglanguage with llvm15 as upstream has yet
to support LLVM 16. Can someone have a pointed how to set a cmake
parameter for llvm15 and its bitecode validation?
See the spec file on:
Hello.
And to add to the reasons, if the GTK4 bindings of webkit would be used,
we would lose screen reader accessibility completely, see
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227528.
Regards,
Lukáš
Dne 03.07.2023 v 18:15 Simon de Vlieger napsal(a):
On 7/3/23 17:18, Demi Marie Obenour
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
5.20230703 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/12
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
5.20230703 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/11
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
5.20230703 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/10
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Mon, Jul 3 2023 at 12:32:02 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
Why is that? WebKitGTK+ is one of those packages that one should only
ship if one is willing to take every update from upstream, but my
understanding is that WebKitGTK+ tries quite hard to make this easy.
The set of packages
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases` that you are following:
``
5.20230703 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/12
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases` that you are following:
``
5.20230703 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/11
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases` that you are following:
``
5.20230703 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/10
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219204
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On 7/3/23 12:30, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 3 2023 at 06:15:43 PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger
> wrote:
>> Funnily enough it was switched explicitly from webkitgtk to Firefox
>> for
>> a reason I forget; I think it was related to disk size. Perhaps Martin
>> or Jiri has more details to
On Mon, Jul 3 2023 at 06:15:43 PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger
wrote:
Funnily enough it was switched explicitly from webkitgtk to Firefox
for
a reason I forget; I think it was related to disk size. Perhaps Martin
or Jiri has more details to share on that.
It's because we're going to remove
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219232
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On 7/3/23 17:18, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Fair. I wonder how much of that memory use would go away if instead of
using Firefox, the web content ran in an embedded WebKitGTK+ webview.
Browser security is not a concern here because in this case the web
content is trusted, and this would also
On 03/07/2023 17:09, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 7/3/23 11:59, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 03/07/2023 16:41, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Would it be possible to ensure that Node packages contain only actual source
code, as in “the preferred form for making modifications” (quote from GNU GPL,
I forget
On 7/3/23 11:59, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 03/07/2023 16:41, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
>> Would it be possible to ensure that Node packages contain only actual source
>> code, as in “the preferred form for making modifications” (quote from GNU
>> GPL,
>> I forget which version)?
>
> The simple
On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 5:01 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
> On 6/3/23 08:42, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 3 2023 at 10:26:07 AM -, John Iliopoulos <
> jxftw2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> While i completely understand why you do this i do think that it is
> >>
On 7/3/23 13:46, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
It is the core of the problem esp. big US companies tend to ignore.
May-be you guys are not aware of there are tendencies to legally
prohibit such "cloud solutions" in many countries?
It's generally not so much 'legally prohibit' as 'data has to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072972
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6
On 03/07/2023 16:41, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Would it be possible to ensure that Node packages contain only actual source
code, as in “the preferred form for making modifications” (quote from GNU GPL,
I forget which version)?
The simple answer is maybe in principle but in practice it's
very
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Jan Grulich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> po 26. 6. 2023 v 19:26 odesílatel Fabio Valentini
> napsal:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 6:21 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>> >
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>> >
>> > == Detailed Description ==
>> > [https://github.com/FedoraQt/QGnomePlatform
Looking at the source to llparse reveals that it contains minified versions
of lodash, source-map, js-yaml, diff, and snprintf-js. The corresponding
source code also appears to be present, but my understanding of Fedora
policy is that the minified versions should not be in a Fedora source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217660
Bug 2217660 depends on bug 2217967, which changed state.
Bug 2217967 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-StackTrace-Extract - Extract a
stack trace from an exception object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217967
What
On 7/3/23 03:18, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> On 7/2/23 23:56, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
>> Remote installation is not a solution to the memory bloat. It only
>> pushes the problem to whatever machine the browser runs on, and it
>> has significant and negative security implications. A solution
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Add change for previous commit
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/39
___
perl-devel mailing list
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that
you are following:
``
Add change for previous commit
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/39
___
perl-devel
Dne 03. 07. 23 v 16:13 Leon Fauster via devel napsal(a):
Am 03.07.23 um 00:41 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Sun, Jul 2 2023 at 08:33:46 AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
wrote:
Hi Michael,
We have been told repeatedly that "the source is there" in CentOS
stream.
The source for the
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Disable optional dependencies in RHEL builds
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/38
___
perl-devel
Am 03.07.23 um 02:00 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Sun, Jul 2 2023 at 06:27:48 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
What about stuff that is too urgent to wait on Red Hat QA? There have
been vulnerabilities (such as CVE-2013-0156 and Log4Shell) for which
unauthenticated, fully automated,
Am 03.07.23 um 00:41 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Sun, Jul 2 2023 at 08:33:46 AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
wrote:
Hi Michael,
We have been told repeatedly that "the source is there" in CentOS
stream.
The source for the next minor version is there.
I can see the scenario that
yselkowitz opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite`
that you are following:
``
Disable optional dependencies in RHEL builds
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/38
Am 01.07.23 um 14:28 schrieb Peter Robinson:
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote:
A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud"
don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and
spreadsheets, they
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230702.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230703.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 18
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 105.86 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Monday, 26 June 2023 at 03:16, James Ralston wrote:
[...]
> To remove a user from a group:
>
> lgroupmod -m someuser somegroup
[...]
> But groupmod has no ability to remove a user from a group.
[...]
> For shadow-utils 4.10 or later, usermod has a new -r option, so it is
> possible to
FYI: also forwarded to the correct gmail address (I'd used org instead of com)
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 11:43:05 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Would anyone know how to contact @ilgrad (Ilya Gradina)? They are one of
> the original members of the neuro-sig packager group, but we've not
>
Dear all,
Would anyone know how to contact @ilgrad (Ilya Gradina)? They are one of
the original members of the neuro-sig packager group, but we've not
heard from them in quite a while now.
I've filed a non-responsive check bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219364
Here are
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 03 July
at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting
is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us
over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedoraproject.org
On 7/3/23 09:23, Victor Toso wrote:
On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 10:09:15PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Victor (CC'd), do you want to pick up grilo and grilo-plugins?
Sure, I'll keep maintaining both in Fedora.
Excellent! Can you click on the "Take" button at
On 03/07/2023 01:28, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
OK, host shared libraries and flatpaked libraries will be loaded at the
same time, but I really doubt that's going to be at all significant.
Include dozens of bundled libraries here too. Only runtimes can use
shared memory.
They do consume
Hi,
po 26. 6. 2023 v 19:26 odesílatel Fabio Valentini
napsal:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 6:21 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >
>
> (snip)
>
> >
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > [https://github.com/FedoraQt/QGnomePlatform QGnomePlatform] project is
> > a Qt Platform Theme plugin. It reads GNOME
Dne 02. 07. 23 v 23:15 Smith, Stewart via devel napsal(a):
3. Per distro package features (in some include file somewhere? Probably not
the SPEC file itself… maybe an include to it?)
In the Avahi example above, the WITH_PYTHON is distro dependent for some
reason, but is local to the package,
On 7/2/23 23:56, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Remote installation is not a solution to the memory bloat. It only
pushes the problem to whatever machine the browser runs on, and it
has significant and negative security implications. A solution
here would be ensuring that the web UI uses no more
57 matches
Mail list logo
