On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 5:39 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Maybe we should have a flag in the src.fp.o package for the maintainer
> to request a PR before committing to have a window for review, or like
> me, the maintainer would like to not be bothered with things that
> proven package can do by
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a0fcd69d86
chromium-120.0.6099.71-1.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
borgbackup-1.2.7-1.el9
Thanks for the assistance Miro.
I've uploaded a local build log here:
https://nathans.fedorapeople.org/xgboost/build.log
AFAICS the python parts of the %install step seemed to have worked, but based
on Sandro's pointer I can see many files are missing.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
Thanks for the assistance Sandro!
What I see is ...
BUILDROOT/xgboost-2.0.2-1.fc39.aarch64/usr/[...] <- all manner of files from
the C++ build/install, then ...
BUILDROOT/xgboost-2.0.2-1.fc39.aarch64/usr/lib
BUILDROOT/xgboost-2.0.2-1.fc39.aarch64/usr/lib/python3.12
Hi,
my name is Rafel Amer and I'm professor at the Technical University
of Catalonia https:/www.upc.edu.
I teach Maths
and I use sagemath for my classes. After the sagemath package is
orphandend, I would like to be a maintainer or
co-maintainer this
On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 11:41 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:21 AM Florian Weimer
> wrote:
> > Asking individual maintainers for trivial changes does not scale.
> > The
> > alternative would be not to address FTBFS and other build issues,
> > maybe
> > file bugs, and rely
On 08. 12. 23 7:22, Nathan Scott wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently been packaging xgboost for Fedora. It's a C++ project using
cmake, with a python module on the side (all in one source tarball):
https://nathans.fedorapeople.org/xgboost/
The dependent dmlc-core package is here:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:18:48PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The main effect of the permissions change on these files is that non-root
> users can't see any env variables set against the commands scheduled to run.
> The actual command lines are still all visible in the proces listing when
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231209.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231210.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 112
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 588.45 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Generally, CIS Benchmarks are only prescriptive and getting near/total
compliance with the benchmark is mainly for those who have host
fleets under some SCAP compliance regime. Nonetheless, picking on the low
hanging fruit such as cron compliance isn't going to drastically improve
the security
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2023-12-11
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org
Greetings testers! It's time for the last QA meeting of the year!
We're going to try moving back to Fedora
11 matches
Mail list logo
