The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-fbdcbc3c7a
python-templated-dictionary-1.4-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-cc00d17a57
monit-5.30.0-2.el7
2
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
17 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3a29f0d349
python-paramiko-2.12.0-2.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3f8d0039e7
mongo-c-driver-1.24.3-2.el8
4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223392
Fedora Release Engineering changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Dear Maintainer,
your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 39.
Action is required from you.
If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259389
Bug ID: 2259389
Summary: perl-Moose-2.2207 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Moose
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259379
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.114-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259379
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 2009523
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2009523=edit
Update to 0.114 (#2259379)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259379
Bug ID: 2259379
Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.114 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive
Keywords:
AgreeThank you.
See below
Leslie Satenstein
On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 01:35:13 p.m. EST, kevin
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 09:15:18AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 4:50 AM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > This is not a good idea. Because of a few
On 20/01/2024 16:07, Jerry James wrote:
Upstream has this in src/tbb/CMakeLists.txt:
if (CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8)
set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb)
else()
set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb32)
endif()
That makes the pkgconfig file install as tbb32.pc. I don't know why
upstream is doing that. Maybe so
Am 20.01.24 um 14:47 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 2:41 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 02:27:58PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
AusweisApp2-2.0.3 build failed on rawhide/x86_64 with unsupported reloc 43
errors [1]. Other architectures have built fine,
* Julian Sikorski:
> AusweisApp2-2.0.3 build failed on rawhide/x86_64 with unsupported
> reloc 43 errors [1]. Other architectures have built fine, similarly to
> released branches. Is this a problem with rawhide ld.gold?
>
> Best regards,
> Julian
>
> [1]
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 8:32 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Aha, thanks for figuring that out! The problem was also observed at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036372#c43 but I didn't
> get the right explanation.
>
> I'm not sure why the i686 package does that, maybe Jerry knows (I
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 at 15:10, Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> It looks like openvdb-devel manages to accidentally depend on the tbb compat
> package on i686 only, which breaks OpenImageIO because OpenImageIO depends on
> the updated tbb, and that conflicts with the compat package:
>
> Problem: package
It looks like openvdb-devel manages to accidentally depend on the tbb
compat package on i686 only, which breaks OpenImageIO because
OpenImageIO depends on the updated tbb, and that conflicts with the
compat package:
Problem: package tbb2020.3-devel-2020.3-3.fc40.i686 conflicts with tbb-devel
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 2:41 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 02:27:58PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > AusweisApp2-2.0.3 build failed on rawhide/x86_64 with unsupported reloc 43
> > errors [1]. Other architectures have built fine, similarly to released
> > branches. Is this
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 02:27:58PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> AusweisApp2-2.0.3 build failed on rawhide/x86_64 with unsupported reloc 43
> errors [1]. Other architectures have built fine, similarly to released
> branches. Is this a problem with rawhide ld.gold?
I thought reloc 43 (aka
Hello,
AusweisApp2-2.0.3 build failed on rawhide/x86_64 with unsupported reloc
43 errors [1]. Other architectures have built fine, similarly to
released branches. Is this a problem with rawhide ld.gold?
Best regards,
Julian
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112033714
18 matches
Mail list logo
