[Bug 2262717] perl-Log-ger-0.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262717 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2262717] perl-Log-ger-0.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262717 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: Figure out what killed an app (rhbz#2253099)

On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 14:03 +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote: > The kernel killing the main evolution process which was set as having > rt priority by some webkit coincidence. Hi, there it is then. I see those: > Jan 31 10:49:22 localhost.localdomain rtkit-daemon[826]: > Successfully made

[Bug 2262670] perl-Pod-Checker-1.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262670 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2262670] perl-Pod-Checker-1.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262670 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2262363] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262363 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2262363] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262363 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-d94840542e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-d94840542e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2262363] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262363 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-0d92c2c65d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0d92c2c65d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2262363] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262363 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2262451] perl-URI-5.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262451 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 32 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3a29f0d349 python-paramiko-2.12.0-2.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-11fae9c7fb python-aiohttp-3.7.4-2.el8 2

[Bug 2262717] New: perl-Log-ger-0.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262717 Bug ID: 2262717 Summary: perl-Log-ger-0.041 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Log-ger Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Test-Announce] 2024-02-05 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2024-02-05 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org Greetings testers! It's meeting time again, and once again

[Bug 2260267] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240120 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260267 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

[Bug 2260595] perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.89 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260595 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.89-1.fc |perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.89-1.fc

Re: suitesparse update/soname bump coming this weekend

Update has been submitted: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-a8ac931a22 Everything has been rebuilt except for julia which seems to be FTBFS due to tests never completing. On 2/1/24 17:48, Orion Poplawski wrote: I will be updating suitesparse to 7.6.0 with a new cmake build

[Bug 2260595] perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.89 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260595 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.89-1.fc |perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.89-1.fc

[Bug 2260267] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240120 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260267 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3f1f3dcef0 wordpress-5.1.18-1.el7 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-afdec12596 libebml-1.3.9-2.el7 The following builds have been

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

Tom Seewald wrote: > You were implying that Kevin was claiming to be an "unbiased observer" and > that him being banned from the KDE SIG means he has ulterior motives for > this beyond simply maintaining Plasma X11 packages. To make this clear, my motivation for maintaining Plasma X11 packages is

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

Naheem Zaffar wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to create a new totally different named SIG? > > Since bug reporting and crossover of people assuming it is official fedora > plasma are the concerns, a totally independent named SIG and an > independently named desktop should be considered serious

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 11:08:15AM +, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 10:47 AM Peter Hutterer > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 03:40:24PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 15:31 +0100, Leon Fauster via devel wrote: > > > > Am 01.02.24 um 14:18 schrieb

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 9:04 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Jonathan Bennett via devel wrote: > > the KDE SIG doesn't have a track record of handing those kind of bans out > > flippantly. > > That is what they want you to believe. Sure, this used to be the case, a few > years ago. >

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Sun, 4 Feb 2024, 23:16 Sérgio Basto, wrote: > On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 03:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > It's extremely obvious that people want to use it. You replied to > > > someone who did and denigrated their opinion. Frankly, I'm > > > disappointed in

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 03:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: > > It's extremely obvious that people want to use it. You replied to > > someone who did and denigrated their opinion. Frankly, I'm > > disappointed in your response as well as the tone of you and Kevin. > > I

Introduction

Hi, I'm a long time Fedora user and used to help develop the Ralink Wireless driver (rt2x00) that's been present in the kernel for a long time. I'm now entering the process of helping maintain the mixxx package over at rpmfusion. Hope to be useful with this new venture. Luis Correia --

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Steve Cossette wrote: >> There's also a secondary thing that I feel hasn't been discussed here >> though: I know work is being done right now to isolate the x11 >> components of plasma and add build-time options to strip out those >> components. What happens when we

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

> I'm fairly certain you should be > saying this to Kevin. I'm fairly certain it applies to everyone involved. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

You were implying that Kevin was claiming to be an "unbiased observer" and that him being banned from the KDE SIG means he has ulterior motives for this beyond simply maintaining Plasma X11 packages. Call it what you want, but it doesn't make for a constructive discussion. --

[Package Review] MaterialX

Hello team, materialx package, needed for Blender, is ready for review. Currently, python support is disabled for the time being as unsure where to fix the path. As pointed out, upstream failed to adhere to FHS standard so heavy use of sed -i is needed so patch may be needed to submit to

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

PS: Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > The atmosphere on #fedora-kde IRC radically changed on 2020-07-13. I also think that that date was not a coincidence, because shortly after that date, the KDE SIG went through with such changes as: * Wayland by default for Plasma, * a push for KDE

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On 2/4/24 14:16, Tom Seewald wrote: On February 3, 2024 8:55:42 PM CST, Kevin Kofler via devel Jumping to an accusation of bad faith, rather than addressing anything that Kevin wrote, doesn't make for a productive discussion. I'm fairly certain you should be saying this to Kevin. --

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

Jonathan Bennett via devel wrote: > the KDE SIG doesn't have a track record of handing those kind of bans out > flippantly. That is what they want you to believe. Sure, this used to be the case, a few years ago. The atmosphere on #fedora-kde IRC radically changed on 2020-07-13. Until then, it

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On February 4, 2024 2:16:55 PM CST, Tom Seewald wrote: >> On February 3, 2024 8:55:42 PM CST, Kevin Kofler via devel >> > >> Wait, you're banned from all the KDE channels in Fedora? I have no idea what >> led to >> that, though the KDE SIG doesn't have a track record of handing those kind >>

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

> On February 3, 2024 8:55:42 PM CST, Kevin Kofler via devel > > Wait, you're banned from all the KDE channels in Fedora? I have no idea what > led to > that, though the KDE SIG doesn't have a track record of handing those kind of > bans out > flippantly. But regardless, that calls into

[heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.9.0 with soname bump on rawhide

Hi, I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we have any thing that prevent to proceeding. Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list --

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On February 3, 2024 8:55:42 PM CST, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >Neal Gompa wrote: >> It's extremely obvious that people want to use it. You replied to >> someone who did and denigrated their opinion. Frankly, I'm >> disappointed in your response as well as the tone of you and Kevin. > >I

[Bug 2262670] New: perl-Pod-Checker-1.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262670 Bug ID: 2262670 Summary: perl-Pod-Checker-1.77 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Pod-Checker Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2259537] perl-WWW-Curl-4.17-35.fc40 FTBFS: curlopt-constants.c:19:58: error: ‘return’ with no value, in function returning non-void

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259537 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2260337] perl-Search-Elasticsearch-8.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260337 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Doc Type|---

[Bug 2260481] perl-Net-DHCP redundant buildreq: perl(Test::Vars)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260481 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2261957] perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261957 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2262550] perl-Catalyst-Manual-5.9012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262550 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Catalyst-Manual-5.9012

Re: Figure out what killed an app (rhbz#2253099)

On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 13:29 +0100, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 17:52, Yanko Kaneti wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 09:44 +0100, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 09:13, Milan Crha wrote: > > > > The kernel tracing log for sig==9 shows: > > > > > > > >

License change for perl-Net-DHCP

Hello, all. The license tag on perl-Net-DHCP has been corrected from: GPL+ or Artistic to MIT Regards, Emmanuel -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Any press is good press? I believe that the coverage only hurts the > reputation of the Fedora KDE SIG. If you see the discussions, many people > are grabbing their virtual pitchforks, or silently switching distributions > as a result of the news (even though it is