[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2024-04-22 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-99cf4e74b7 putty-0.81-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing openssl3-3.2.1-1.1.el8 stow-2.4.0-1.el8 Details

[EPEL-devel] Re: Anyone want to maintain openssl3 for epel8?

2024-04-22 Thread Michel Lind
On 4/22/24 17:03, Michel Lind wrote: I created this (tracking c9s' openssl package) since there were plans to start depending on openssl v3 in systemd back in 2022, but looks like that has not happened yet - and CentOS Hyperscale SIG is no longer updating our systemd package for c8s. The

Re: Fedora RISC-V port needs to put shared objects into /usr/lib64/lp64d

2024-04-22 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> > Just for your information, here's how Gentoo is doing things to stay > compatible > with as many variants as possible: > PS. Stage files are here: https://www.gentoo.org/downloads/#riscv (rv32-ilp32 is still building, rv32 musl is waiting until the worst musl-1.2.5 issues are ironed

Review swaps

2024-04-22 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
Hi all, I have 3 packages awaiting reviews. I'm happy to exchange. First is a new IBus input method (code includes bits of C and Python): ibus-array: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275556 The other two are trivial rust packages that I need for upcoming libchewing release:

Re: Fedora RISC-V port needs to put shared objects into /usr/lib64/lp64d

2024-04-22 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Hi, I'm handling the RISC-V libdirs in Gentoo. > There are multiple PRs and patches floating around that make RISC-V use > the /usr/lib64 directory, like other 64-bit ports. However, RISC-V > recommends to use /usr/lib64/lp64d for the Fedora ABI variant, and > various upstream projects follow

[Bug 2276541] New: perl-JSON-Path-1.0.5 is available

2024-04-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276541 Bug ID: 2276541 Summary: perl-JSON-Path-1.0.5 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-JSON-Path Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: [Heads-up] More spring cleaning: orphaning bamf

2024-04-22 Thread Michel Lind
On 4/22/24 16:32, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:12 PM Michel Lind wrote: Dear all, I've been maintaining bamf for... quite some time, and don't actually have a need for it anymore. It's pretty much in maintenance mode upstream as well. I've built the last stable

[EPEL-devel] Anyone want to maintain openssl3 for epel8?

2024-04-22 Thread Michel Lind
I created this (tracking c9s' openssl package) since there were plans to start depending on openssl v3 in systemd back in 2022, but looks like that has not happened yet - and CentOS Hyperscale SIG is no longer updating our systemd package for c8s. The maintenance involved is mainly rebasing

Re: RC 1.14 fails in VirtualBox, has problems in UTM

2024-04-22 Thread Barry
> On 19 Apr 2024, at 16:57, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On VMWare it plays but is distorted, > don't know why. Maybe a known issue with vmware, I have been told. Something to do with needing to reclock the audio stream. Barry -- ___ devel mailing

Re: [Heads-up] More spring cleaning: orphaning bamf

2024-04-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:12 PM Michel Lind wrote: > > Dear all, > > I've been maintaining bamf for... quite some time, and don't actually have a > need for it anymore. > > It's pretty much in maintenance mode upstream as well. > > I've built the last stable version in Rawhide to close >

Re: [Heads-up] More spring cleaning: orphaning bamf

2024-04-22 Thread Michel Lind
On 4/22/24 16:12, Michel Lind wrote: Dear all, I've been maintaining bamf for... quite some time, and don't actually have a need for it anymore. It's pretty much in maintenance mode upstream as well. I've built the last stable version in Rawhide to close

[Heads-up] More spring cleaning: orphaning bamf

2024-04-22 Thread Michel Lind
Dear all, I've been maintaining bamf for... quite some time, and don't actually have a need for it anymore. It's pretty much in maintenance mode upstream as well. I've built the last stable version in Rawhide to close https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055853 but will probably not

Re: Self Introduction: Łukasz W.

2024-04-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:43 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:16 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz > wrote: > > > > You're welcome. rust-appdirs got in and I believe is waiting to be > > available in the repositories. > > No, it's waiting for *you* to actually import the package. :)

Re: Self Introduction: Łukasz W.

2024-04-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:16 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote: > > You're welcome. rust-appdirs got in and I believe is waiting to be > available in the repositories. No, it's waiting for *you* to actually import the package. :) Just getting the package review ticket approved does nothing on its own.

Simpler first tutorial package for Package Maintainer Docs

2024-04-22 Thread Otto Liljalaakso
Hello everybody, I wrote a pull request for Package Maintainer Docs about adding a simpler tutorial package than GNU Hello [1]. Since it is a larger change and I have not received any reviews yet, I would like to announce this work here, in hope of getting some feedback, before just merging

matio soname bump

2024-04-22 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
matio 1.5.27 is coming to rawhide. I'm building it in side tag 41-build-side-88211. I'll rebuild kst, LapPlt, openmeed, and vips there, and then merge. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d.

Re: Self Introduction: Łukasz W.

2024-04-22 Thread Łukasz Wojniłowicz
Hi Dominik, On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:31:50 +0200 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hello, Łukasz. > > On Sunday, 21 April 2024 at 20:37, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > @decathorpe reviewed my first package positively at > >

Re: Self Introduction: Łukasz W.

2024-04-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 08:37:12PM +0200, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote: > Hi all, > > @decathorpe reviewed my first package positively at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271100 > and now I'm looking for somebody to sponsor me. My official request for > sponsorship is at

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
I tried to so synfig and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, and they need some of the others rebuilt first: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2955/116742955/root.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3027/116743027/root.log --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers

Re: Self Introduction: Łukasz W.

2024-04-22 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello, Łukasz. On Sunday, 21 April 2024 at 20:37, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote: > Hi all, > > @decathorpe reviewed my first package positively at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271100 > and now I'm looking for somebody to sponsor me. My official request for > sponsorship is at

Heads up: orphaned bti (bash twitter id*ocy)

2024-04-22 Thread Michel Lind
Dear all, I just orphaned https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bti - a command-line Twitter client. I no longer use Twitter anymore, this package has basically not needed any attention (it rebuilds fine) but I'm not sure if it works anymore post-takeover. It does have an open issue asking for

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Josef Řídký
Well good news, the F40 rebuild is not needed. It looks like there was an issue with proper bug report reference. Sorry for the disturbance about that in F40. But the Rawhide rebuild is still in place so please use f41-build-side-88169 for rebuild of dependent packages. Best regards Josef Ridky

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Josef Řídký
Hi Ben, thanks for the notice. I'll fill the FESCO ticket right away and wait for their decision. So let's call F40 only (not Rawhide) side tags builds on hold till the decision is made. Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. On Mon, Apr 22,

Re: Rust Stack Spring Cleaning - 2024 Edition

2024-04-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:13 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > I am aware of a few of the above I'm listed against that my deps no > longer requre (eg passwd) but I hadn't got around to working out what > else depended on them to retire without possibly breaking something > else, overall happy for

Re: Rust Stack Spring Cleaning - 2024 Edition

2024-04-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 14:26, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hello Rust packagers, > > I'm continuously working on reducing unnecessary accumulation of cruft > in the Rust package stack in Fedora, and I have been keeping track of > unused library packages for almost three years now. > > Some of these

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Ben Beasley
Is there a specific reason that an ABI-breaking update in required in the stable F40 release? And would you consider asking FESCo for approval as required by the Updates Policy? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#stable-releases Note that if this update happens in F40

libarrow (Apache Arrow) SONAME bump in rawhide

2024-04-22 Thread Kaleb Keithley
Coming soon. Updating to Arrow 16.0.0 -- Kaleb -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240422.n.0 changes

2024-04-22 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240421.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240422.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 57 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 31.15 MiB Size of dropped packages

No FESCo Meeting this Monday (2024-04-22)

2024-04-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
There is nothing on the agenda, so the meeting is cancelled. I'll chair the next meeting. = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = #3197 Request for Updates Policy Exception: ruff https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3197 APPROVED (+4, 0, 0) #3195 Change: Pytest 8 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3195

[HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Josef Řídký
Hi folks, this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr package in Fedora Rawhide and f40. List of dependent package should be following (please, correct me if I haven't found all): CTL ImageMagick OpenColorIO OpenEXR_Viewers OpenImageIO OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR blender

Re: Fedora RISC-V port needs to put shared objects into /usr/lib64/lp64d

2024-04-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:07:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:21:57PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> There are multiple PRs and patches floating around that make RISC-V use > >> the /usr/lib64 directory, like other 64-bit ports.

Re: Fedora RISC-V port needs to put shared objects into /usr/lib64/lp64d

2024-04-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* David Abdurachmanov: > We most likely will not have ABIs installed in parallel, but we might > change ABI. Currently Linux distributions target "RV64GC", but we > don't really want that for the future RISC-V. I keep telling folks > that "RV64GC" is already "a legacy" (10+ years old), but that's

Re: Fedora RISC-V port needs to put shared objects into /usr/lib64/lp64d

2024-04-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* Andrea Bolognani: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:21:57PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> There are multiple PRs and patches floating around that make RISC-V use >> the /usr/lib64 directory, like other 64-bit ports. However, RISC-V >> recommends to use /usr/lib64/lp64d for the Fedora ABI variant,

Re: Fedora RISC-V port needs to put shared objects into /usr/lib64/lp64d

2024-04-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* Daniel P. Berrangé: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:21:57PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> There are multiple PRs and patches floating around that make RISC-V use >> the /usr/lib64 directory, like other 64-bit ports. However, RISC-V >> recommends to use /usr/lib64/lp64d for the Fedora ABI

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: Monday, 22 April 2024 (today) at 13:00 UTC

2024-04-22 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday, 22 April at 13:00 UTC. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over on Matrix in the Fedora Meeting channel: https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org You can use

Re: Orphaning my packages: elvish, git-delta & dependencies

2024-04-22 Thread Felix Wang
Thanks, I opened a re-review request of elvish to follow package renaming process [1]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2276356 [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Renaming_Process/ -- ___ devel

Re: Orphaning my packages: elvish, git-delta & dependencies

2024-04-22 Thread Mikel Olasagasti
Hau idatzi du Felix Wang (topa...@outlook.com) erabiltzaileak (2024 api. 22(a), al. (03:57)): > > I'd like to take elvish package, Current package golang-github-elves-elvish should be replaced by a new one[1], set correct Obsoletes tag and retired. The name and goipath are not correct anymore.a