On 23-07-2024 20:30, Sandro via devel wrote:
PyGithub will be updated to 2.3.0 in rawhide soon. This is a major
update and according to upstream's changelog [1] it comes with breaking
changes. The first update containing breaking changes is 1.59.0. We are
currently on 1.58.2.
Please take a
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-a71cc2c724
tinyproxy-1.11.2-1.el9
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-9376ff0291
openvpn-2.5.11-1.el9
The following builds have
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 1:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 03. 07. 24 15:00, Tomáš Orsava wrote:
> >
> > On 7/3/24 12:07, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> I am working on the RPM pyproject declarative buildsystem.
> >>
> >> t;dr it turns this:
> >>
> >> BuildSystem:
Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2024 02:52:44 CEST schrieb Gary Buhrmaster:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:38 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
And this one is yet another case of FESCo rubberstamping a change without
even any dissenting vote despite loads of negative mailing list feedback.
How can one
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-364aa14fb2
tinyproxy-1.11.2-1.el8
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-0f1d365d9d
exim-4.98-2.el8
The following builds have been
Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2024 02:41:12 CEST schrieb Gary Buhrmaster:
And, FWIW, it appears that qtwebkit has been
FTBFS since F39, so qtwebkit could end up
being a moot point.
It built fine in the F39 mass rebuild, only started failing in the F40 one.
So it is NOT in the list of packages to be
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:38 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
> And this one is yet another case of FESCo rubberstamping a change without
> even any dissenting vote despite loads of negative mailing list feedback.
How can one determine "loads"? Since the
feedback itself is opt-in, no
On 7/23/24 5:04 PM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:56 PM Steve Dickson wrote:
On 7/23/24 4:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:31:31PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello
I've got the following warning
RPM build warnings:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 12:23 AM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> I believe qt5-qtwebkit uses python3 for builds
> (I believe the qt4 variant does use python2,
> but a quick repoquery indicates no fedora
> package depends on qtwebkit-devel, although
> I admit the query may have been wrong,
> and I think
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:30 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > #3244 Change: Retire Python 2.7
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3244
> > APPROVED (+8, 0, 0)
>
> This is going to break the build of a whole bunch of compatibility packages,
> which will in
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024, 6:38 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > #3242 Change: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3242
> > APPROVED (+6, 0, 0)
>
> And this one is yet another case of FESCo
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> #3242 Change: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3242
> APPROVED (+6, 0, 0)
And this one is yet another case of FESCo rubberstamping a change without
even any dissenting vote despite loads of negative mailing list feedback.
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> #3244 Change: Retire Python 2.7
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3244
> APPROVED (+8, 0, 0)
This is going to break the build of a whole bunch of compatibility packages,
which will in turn break a lot of software in Fedora.
Do you expect packages to do what
Hello All!
I've got a few packages waiting for review and I am willing to review
yours in return.
First I have two Erlang-related packages. Both passes unit-tests,
builds just fine,
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2299556 - erlang-gpb, a modern Google
Protobuf compiler for Erlang.
*
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:56 PM Steve Dickson wrote:
> On 7/23/24 4:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:31:31PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I've got the following warning
> >>
> >> RPM build warnings:
> >>
On 7/23/24 4:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:31:31PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello
I've got the following warning
RPM build warnings:
source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing
The spec file definitely has a %changelog
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:31:31PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've got the following warning
>
> RPM build warnings:
> source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing
>
> The spec file definitely has a %changelog section.
> What is it the warning about?
What
Hello
I've got the following warning
RPM build warnings:
source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing
The spec file definitely has a %changelog section.
What is it the warning about?
tia,
steved.
--
___
devel mailing list --
Hi,
PyGithub will be updated to 2.3.0 in rawhide soon. This is a major
update and according to upstream's changelog [1] it comes with breaking
changes. The first update containing breaking changes is 1.59.0. We are
currently on 1.58.2.
Please take a look yourself if it affects your package.
Hi everyone.
The mass rebuild finished yesterday and after some untagging and
restarting composes, the rawhide compose finished.
For the next 2 weeks, You can see the report at:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20240723.n.0/logs/changelog-Fedora-Rawhide
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-23/fesco.2024-07-23-17.00.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-23/fesco.2024-07-23-17.00.log.html
Text Minutes:
Thanks Eduardo. I wasn't aware of your gmail account.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to
multiple lists and previously handled on another list.
--
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:54:12AM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> However, we should still consider the effect this will have on
> developers that build software on Fedora — they will also have to
> specify -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE now or see failing builds, and we don’t
> really see that impact until
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 11:02, Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On 23. Jul 2024, at 16:36, Gary Buhrmaster
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:55 AM Clemens Lang wrote:
> >
> >> However, we should still consider the effect this will have on developers
> >> that build software on
Hi,
> On 23. Jul 2024, at 16:36, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:55 AM Clemens Lang wrote:
>
>> However, we should still consider the effect this will have on developers
>> that build software on Fedora — they will also have to specify
>> -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE now or see
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:55 AM Clemens Lang wrote:
> However, we should still consider the effect this will have on developers
> that build software on Fedora — they will also have to specify
> -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE now or see failing builds, and we don’t really see that
> impact until 41
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:26 PM Cristian Le via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On the dist-git I don't think there is any. For bodhi though you can
> make `gating.yaml` file. Here [1] is one which includes `rpminspect`
>
> ```yaml
> --- !Policy
> product_versions:
>-
There you go, I've promoted you to admin role on the project.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 11:28 AM Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
wrote:
> Hi Emanuel,
>
> Although I've left RH, I'm still active on email. I'm sorry if I missed
> any messages you tried sending me, but I couldn't find any from you in my
>
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 41 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 1 week, i.e. around 2024-07-30.
Policy:
Hi Emanuel,
Although I've left RH, I'm still active on email. I'm sorry if I missed any
messages you tried sending me, but I couldn't find any from you in my
inbox, until today.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:05 AM Emanuel Lima wrote:
> I would like to become the official and only maintainer of
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:18 PM Jun Aruga (he / him)
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently the rpminspect test is executed as non-voting in Zuul CI.[1]
> I want to change the setting to make rpminspect required to pass the
> Zuul CI on the rpms/rubygem-mysql2 dist-git repository.
> Could you tell
On the dist-git I don't think there is any. For bodhi though you can
make `gating.yaml` file. Here [1] is one which includes `rpminspect`
```yaml
--- !Policy
product_versions:
- fedora-*
decision_contexts:
- bodhi_update_push_stable
subject_type: koji_build
rules:
- !PassingTestCaseRule
Hello,
Currently the rpminspect test is executed as non-voting in Zuul CI.[1]
I want to change the setting to make rpminspect required to pass the
Zuul CI on the rpms/rubygem-mysql2 dist-git repository.
Could you tell me how to do it?
Thanks.
[1]
On 7/23/24 09:04, Emanuel Lima wrote:
I would like to become the official and only maintainer of
kata-containers as etrunko (Eduardo Lima) has been non responsive to me
and has left Red Hat (as far as I know). Does anyone know how I should
proceed or who should I contact?
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 08:59, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:24 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 10:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 11:04 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>> > > Coming soon.
>> > >
>> > > Updating to Arrow
I would like to become the official and only maintainer of kata-containers
as etrunko (Eduardo Lima) has been non responsive to me and has left Red
Hat (as far as I know). Does anyone know how I should proceed or who should
I contact?
Thanks in advance.
--
Kind Regards,
Emanuel Lima
Software
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 2:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:37:20PM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > I request somebody from the tools team to comment on these concerns. We only
> > report the defects identified by gcc, clang etc.
>
> You wrote:
>
> > TLDR: This
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:24 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 10:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 11:04 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > > Coming soon.
> > >
> > > Updating to Arrow 16.0.0
> >
> > Thanks for the minimal notice, but that is not how this
Once upon a time, Jocelyn Falempe said:
> It's no longer necessary to disable VT_CONSOLE to enable DRM_PANIC.
> So I have updated the wiki page, and also moved it to
> self-contained-change, as there are no more system-wide impact by
> enabling DRM_PANIC.
Thanks for the additional work on this.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:32 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's no longer necessary to disable VT_CONSOLE to enable DRM_PANIC.
> So I have updated the wiki page, and also moved it to
> self-contained-change, as there are no more system-wide impact by
> enabling DRM_PANIC.
>
> I've also
Hi,
It's no longer necessary to disable VT_CONSOLE to enable DRM_PANIC.
So I have updated the wiki page, and also moved it to
self-contained-change, as there are no more system-wide impact by
enabling DRM_PANIC.
I've also made a new kernel build, with VT_CONSOLE and DRM_PANIC
enabled, so
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Rawhide 20240723.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
lbalhar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are
following:
``
Add new systemtap-sdt-dtrace to build deps
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/14
--
___
perl-devel mailing
On 7/19/24 05:42, Michel Lind wrote:
Hi František,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:36:01AM +0200, František Šumšal wrote:
Due to a couple of CVEs I'll need to rebase botan2 in EPEL 8 to a slightly less
ancient version (which also brings me to [0], about which I completely forgot
after I took
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-07-23 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
V Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Julian Sikorski napsal(a):
> Am 22.07.24 um 22:53 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel:
> > Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > > Germany uses their own implementation too:
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/AusweisApp2
> > > To add insult to injury, it requires the
Am 22.07.24 um 22:53 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel:
Julian Sikorski wrote:
Germany uses their own implementation too:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/AusweisApp2
To add insult to injury, it requires the use of custom EC curves, which
are bound to stop working at any moment:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:32:03PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 01:19:27AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 23. 07. 24 1:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > I noticed the following when comparing packages after the rebuild:
> > >
> > > │ │ │
> > >
Hi,
> On 22. Jul 2024, at 20:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> At this point, this sounds like the best approach.
> The problem is well understood and the build failures are trivially
> resolved by adding a single BuildRequires line or a single define.
>
> If we start changing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299447
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
This is triggered by upgrading crypto-policies to 20240717-1.git154fd4e.fc41
which disabled SHA-1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299447
Bug ID: 2299447
Summary: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-1.24-3.fc41 FTBFS: tests fail:
libcrypto error (SEC.xs line 274) at
blib/lib/Net/DNS/SEC/RSA.pm line 73
Product: Fedora
Dear colleagues,
OpenSSL has announced the performance tuning webinar on August 1
https://openssl.org/blog/blog/2024/07/18/August-Webinar/
Feel free to register and join
--
Dmitry Belyavskiy
--
___
devel mailing list --
53 matches
Mail list logo
