On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 1:38 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> As said elsewhere in the change, this kernel module has been enabled
> since 6.14 kernels when it was first upstream. The idea that we
> should *load* this module by default on every system is absolutely the
> wrong way to go.
+1 (to this
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 08:51:36 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
For libavif/jpegxl, my recommendation is review the build flags to
disable building the gdk-pixbuf support, and remove the subpackages
that provide the pixbuf loaders.
Proposed https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libavif/pul
I've put in a ticket to unretire python-netdisco.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12938
As far as I can tell, the original package was retired because upstream is
archived.
However it is still required as a dependency of home-assistant-cli.
I've also updated it to use the modern pyproject macros
On Thu, 2025-09-04 at 08:51 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> First, gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer will no longer be built. It is currently
> broken in F43 and upstream recommends that we stop building it
> altogether. It is obsoleted by glycin-thumbnailer, which works well.
> (Although jxl support see
Hello all,
My name is David Wang but I go by various aliases and what not. For the
sole purpose of communicating with you all I will be known as tuxsavvy.
I am glad to be interested in this Fedora project. 😄️
I presently use Arch Linux on my own desktops, but I do use Fedora
Linux on laptops, as
Hi all,
I would like to formally introduce Allison King to the Fedora
community. Allison will be managing the changes process for Fedora
Linux 44 while I am out on leave from October 28, 2025 to April 20,
2026.
You will start to see Allison's name attached to the F44 changes from
now on while I o
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 04:04:00 PM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
Coming soon. I'd actually really like to build it now, but I figure I
should wait for a *small* amount of time between sending this
proposal and implementing it.
Unfortunately gdk-pixbuf is currently broken in i686 on F43,
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 08:01:14 PM +02:00:00, Wolfgang
wrote:
Is there rebuilt of gdk-pixbuf2 against 2.0.rc version of glycin
planed to support latest changes to fix
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glycin/-/issues/175 ?
Coming soon. I'd actually really like to build it now, but I figure I
sho
On Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:51:36 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I have checked our gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra package. I think the
> BMP, ICO, PNM, and TGA loaders are now obsolete and can safely be
> disabled. The other loaders provided by this package are still
> needed, but they cover particularl
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 3:03 AM Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NTSYNC
> Discussion post -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f44-change-proposal-enable-ntsync-kernel-module-for-all-users-system-wide/161786
>
> This is a proposed Chang
Am 04.09.25 um 18:39 schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
If you are CCed on this mail, then action is required (mat2) or
recommended (libavif, jpegxl, gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra,
webp-pixbuf-loader).
I propose some*mildly* disruptive changes for the gdk-pixbuf2 package
in rawhide an
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 2:52 PM Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote:
>
> The idea I'm considering: maintain identical Go versions across all active
> Fedora releases. Ideally, starting with the next Fedora release, every new
> stable release will have the latest Go version. For example, by the time of
Hi all.
Recently, i see following error (No PMIx server was reachable) with
NPICH only:
```
+ export PETSC_ARCH=x86_64
+ PETSC_ARCH=x86_64
+ export PETSC_DIR=./
+ PETSC_DIR=./
+ export
PYTHONPATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/petsc-3.23.6-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages/mpich
+
PY
There is one more problem. Third-party thumbnailers under
/usr/share/thumbnailers that use gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer don't work
anymore (and are no longer necessary). We should remove them from
libavif, librsvg, and jpegxl.
--
___
devel mailing list
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NTSYNC
Discussion post -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f44-change-proposal-enable-ntsync-kernel-module-for-all-users-system-wide/161786
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Chan
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250904.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 31
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hello everyone,
I am orphaning python-agate (and its linked packages python-agate-sql,
python-agate-excel and python-agate-dbf) as well as python-csvkit (which
depends on python-agate). I created all those packages to use python-csvkit. I
don’t need this anymore and don’t have time to maintain
Hi all,
The F43 Beta Go/No-Go is scheduled for Thursday, 11 September in
#fedora-meeting on Matrix @ 1700 UTC[1]. At this time, we will
determine the status of the F43 Beta for the early target date of 16
September[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the
wiki[3].
[1] http
Wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ptrace_scope_bpf_jit_harden
Discussion Thread:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f44-change-proposal-ptrace-scope-bpf-jit-harden-systemwide-ptrace-scope-bpf-jit-harden-systemwide/163535
**This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.**
This document
Hi,
libprometheus-cpp was used for nfs-ganesha -5.x, in Fedora 41 and 40.
nfs-ganesha-6.x and -7.x in Fedora 42 and later no longer
use libprometheus-cpp.
Nothing else uses libprometheus-cpp in Fedora. (Based on `dnf repoquery
--whatrequires libprometheus-cpp` and `dnf repoquery --whatrequires
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 11:47:45 AM -04:00:00, Yaakov Selkowitz
wrote:
Could glycin add XPM support? Or could the GdkPixbuf XPM loader be
rewritten to use libXpm instead?
I will ask Glycin upstream about XPM, but it's pretty obsolete so I
wouldn't be surprised if the answer is "stop using XPM.
On 9/4/25 11:28, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 08:51:36 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
I have checked our gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra package. I think the BMP,
ICO, PNM, and TGA loaders are now obsolete and can safely be disabled.
The other loaders provided by this packa
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 08:51:36 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
I have checked our gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra package. I think the
BMP, ICO, PNM, and TGA loaders are now obsolete and can safely be
disabled. The other loaders provided by this package are still
needed, but they cover partic
Hi,
If you are CCed on this mail, then action is required (mat2) or
recommended (libavif, jpegxl, gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra,
webp-pixbuf-loader).
I propose some *mildly* disruptive changes for the gdk-pixbuf2 package
in rawhide and also F43. (I was tempted to do this only in rawhide, but
th
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 1:53 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> a new dracut version 108 [1] will soon land in Fedora Rawhide. Please let me
> know if you encounter any problems.
>
> In case you are eager to test it right now you can use COPR or a scratch
> build posted in the source-git PR [2
Hello,
a new dracut version 108 [1] will soon land in Fedora Rawhide. Please let
me know if you encounter any problems.
In case you are eager to test it right now you can use COPR or a scratch
build posted in the source-git PR [2].
[1] https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/releases/tag/108
[2]
On Wed, 2025-09-03 at 20:30 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Debarshi Ray via devel:
>
> > This tendency of Go modules (used as dependencies) to keep updating
> > the required Go version has started to bother me in recent times.
> > It doesn't look like the Go toolchain strictly enforces the
> >
OLD: Fedora-43-20250903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-43-20250904.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
28 matches
Mail list logo
