On 08/12/14 12:10, Michael Spahn wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Probably this is not gnomish enough to him.
Hm... There's something strange familiar with this discussion... yes, in
[1] there are several threads on Firewall blocking desktop features.
I can see both
On 08/12/14 16:33, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 02:31:58PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
There are three products: workstation, server, cloud. Workstation is
the one for desktop use. That leaves server to aim for the traditional
fedora user base, since cloud is (understandably) a
On 08/12/14 23:26, Moez Roy wrote:
I only want certain binaries to be allowed network access.
For example, I want to allow the below binaries access to the internet:
/usr/lib64/firefox/firefox
/usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox
/bin/yum (it seems to be done via python like /usr/bin/python /bin/yum
On 01/12/14 12:26, Alec Leamas wrote:
While we're on it (in the form how many devs do we have): How
hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimate on the #
of users, per package?
[cut]
Some 50 messages later... and stopping by Ben's question about which are
the questions we
On 02/12/14 03:46, Ben Cotton wrote:
That's not to say that there aren't useful questions that could be
answered, but so far they haven't been asked. I think if you start
with the right question, it will be easier to find a route to the
answer.
Hm... and backtracking this another step, an
On 02/12/14 16:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 09:42:24AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
So, a revised/enhanced/even worse set of questions:
[cut]
Some of those questions go too far imo and expose too much about the
individual machines and users.
While I think
While we're on it (in the form how many devs do we have): How
hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimate on the #
of users, per package?
Here are so many problems, technical, policy, resources, (others?). That
said, feedback in the form How many users uses/installs my
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the usage from a download
counter or so. Can we have something similar?
no - you have no clue which mirror was used without explicit tracking in
YUM/DNF and given
On 01/12/14 12:57, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the usage
On 01/12/14 14:34, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/01/2014 01:10 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
That said, let's not limit this discussion to the download counter
concept. There are other approaches, perhaps some kind of reporting app
which send reports on installed sw to a central server, like the abrt
On 01/12/14 15:20, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 1. 12. 2014 at 14:40:44, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 01/12/14 13:56, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 1. 12. 2014 at 12:26:07, Alec Leamas wrote:
While we're on it (in the form how many devs do we have): How
hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimate
On 01/12/14 22:45, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
good, it would have been very useful indeed. And it was controversial
because you can't wipe your nose on fedora-devel without someone
accusing you of a conspiracy to destroy Linux.
We're
Hi all!
Feeling dumb (again...) I have a package which I now need to split into
subpackages. Also, I want the original package to just be an empty one
pulling in all the new subpackages, giving a smooth upgrade path
(installing the base package installs everything, as it used to be).
My
On 30/10/14 10:41, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Hello
2014-10-30 10:32 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com:
Hi all!
Feeling dumb (again...) I have a package which I now need to split
into subpackages.
[cut]
Does this help?
http
On 30/10/14 10:58, Sergio Pascual wrote:
2014-10-30 10:50 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com:
On 30/10/14 10:41, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Hello
2014-10-30 10:32 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
mailto:leamas.a
On 28/10/14 13:43, Brad Bell wrote:
Thanks Alec:
I was using the executable g++ which was installed by the gcc-c++
package, so the gcc-c++ package was installed on the Fedora 20 system.
Your comment about locate cc1plus was a big help. If I add
/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.2
to
On 2014-10-26 13:35, Brad Bell wrote:
I have a python setup.py script that works on Fedora 19 and not Fedora
20. I have tried posting a question about it to python-devel; see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/python-devel/2014-October/000639.html
but have not gotten any response.
On 2014-10-06 15:16, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 10/05/2014 05:15 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 10/04/2014 10:18 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Hm seems that recent bash patch to fix the shellshock problem
introduces this. Fedora-review relies on exported shell functions
(export -f) and the bash fix
On 2014-10-04 20:12, Antonio Trande wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
These warnings appear during a package review; apparently,
fedora-review command completes all its tasks.
WARNING: Illegal return from
/usr/share/fedora-review/scripts/generic-excludearch.sh, code
On 2014-05-27 09:05, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
I'm unable to commit to the newly unretired ndoutils package in the
fedora branches (I'm the owner). This is the error I get:
$ git push
Counting objects: 10, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (2/2),
On 4/24/14, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
So decisions need to be general to allow us to look for a variety of options
to fulfill them. Lets say Fedora decided we want to make it
easier for our users to get more multimedia codecs. We would not get the
go ahead from legal to
On 4/22/14, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
[cut]
Everything in our repos is free, so putting the choice in the
installer seems off to me. Our policy (which is complex and obviously
driven by things stronger than the UX) generally leaves it to users
post-install to add
On 4/23/14, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
There are some aspects on this:
- I don't think Fedora is able add non-free, patent-encumbered sw in
e. g., in the way Ubuntu does - it fails on the fact that US law
On 4/15/14, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 20:31 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
Anyway, I get the feeling that the hunt for the really proper fix is
not that fruitful here. OTOH, if you limit the goals to fulfill the
basic statement to not let the default
On 4/15/14, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.04.2014 11:01, schrieb Jaroslav Reznik:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Disable_Firewall
Change owner(s): Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
The
On 4/15/14, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
[cut]
I keep thinking that, if I had unlimited time, I'd write a totally
different kind of firewall. It would allow some policy (userspace
daemon or rules loaded into the
On 4/15/14, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to say that I really support this feature. I do not see
any point in a firewall for a Workstation.
I have respect for the opinion that firewalld should be disabled
although personally I am far from convinced, there are some
mysterious remarkNot to speak of Norrbotten, a really small part of
the world :) /mysterious remark
--alec
On 4/5/14, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-03 7:50 GMT-03:00 Oden Eriksson o...@nux.se:
Hello,
Hi Oden,
Small Linux world,
Another solution is to incorporate the jenkins variable BUILD_NR in
the release - although not entirely kosher it handles multiple builds
on same date.
--alec
On 2/3/14, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Radek,
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 04:24 -0500, Radek Holy wrote:
it's wierd, I'm
Indeed, as well as in other places e. g., the iconcache snippets.
--alec
On 1/27/14, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 21.1.2014 18:01, Kaleb KEITHLEY napsal(a):
Take, for example,
https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, where there's a
button for Source code (tar.gz)
On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 12:04 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
After hacking a simple tool which provides a GUI for a repository file
it's possible to create repository packages complete with desktop and
appdata file. I have some 5-10 such repository packages under way, my
plan is to push them
On 1/25/14, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 12:04 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
After hacking a simple tool which provides a GUI for a repository file
it's possible to create repository packages complete with desktop and
appdata file. I have some 5-10
On 1/26/14, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
I feel obligated to comment on this. JPackage and Fedora have taken
different routes years ago and installing JPackage rpm on top of Fedora will
likely break Fedora packages due to:
* additional OSGi metadata Fedora ships but JPackage
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.infowrote:
[cut]
The Fedoraproject once again chose to leave non-free out of Fedora. I
appreciate that. I even think a lot of users understand why the
Fedoraproject acts like this (now and earlier, too). But: it utterly
Agreed. But the difference is that using full commits a history rewrite
will always be detected. Using a tag is making it possible for upstream to
bind the same tag to a different commit. And since it's possible, it will
happen.
It's a shame there is no way to block forced updates on github.
Well, lpf ( in package lpf) is about this: it downloads, builds and
installs a target package from sources. As of now, there are no
user-defined options; no usecase so far. Wouldn't be hard to add if need be.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote:
I first
See [1], in particular the section on %version
--alec
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Zoltan Kota zolt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The author of recode moved the source tarballs to Github. There he
provides release tags, see
Actually, the GL are pretty clear here: the source should be referenced
using the full commit, nothing else. There is some reasoning why. The tag
should got to Version: (as long its 'sane').
Besides that this is the existing GL, there is also a subtle difference in
git-archive (which supposedly
, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, the GL are pretty clear here: the source should be
referenced using the full commit, nothing else. There is some
reasoning why. The tag should got
If you continue reading the thread you'll see what happened (short story:
too late fo rme)
--alec
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:43:13 +0100
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, this is not, and have never
I have come to understand that for yum, commands like clean only applies to
the actual buildroot. So without a -r argument, the cleaning is done on the
default root, whatever this might be(?).
Actually, there is probably nothing wrong with this - it works fine when
using the -r option. Problems
Well, IMHO the docs are actually quite clear on that 'all' refers to all
metadata rather than all repositories.
That said, perhaps enough people has been confused by this to make some
kind of improvement motivated.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
' as a legal option? Personally, I tend to
think this might make things a little clearer.
Just my 5 öre
--alec
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Well, IMHO the docs are actually quite clear on that 'all
Yes, sorry, forget what I wrote. I messed up mock with yum, that's why.
It's too late for me to chime in here. Sorry for the noise.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 13.01.2014 00:43, schrieb Alec Leamas:
First of all, this is not, and have
Yes, still it's an interesting issue... perhaps one count how many which
actually are installed, but many problems also here: users privacy/opt-in,
easily spoofed, infrastructure.
In any case it would be great to have some estimate on this.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Michael Schwendt
On 2014-01-04 21:31, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 01/04/2014 08:56 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
* yum remove kernel vs dnf remove kernel difference (unfiled? )
I found 976704, closed with 'Resolution: --- → UPSTREAM' in August.
Not sure what that means, but removing all kernels seem a bit odd
On 2013-12-14 15:00, Mattia Verga wrote:
Il 14/12/2013 12:55, Dridi Boukelmoune ha scritto:
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Mattia Vergamattia.ve...@tiscali.it wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to give a user access rights to X with xhost command.
I've created a script named
On 2013-12-14 15:31, Mattia Verga wrote:
Il 14/12/2013 15:12, Alec Leamas ha scritto:
I really wonder if $DISPLAY is defined within systemd's execution
context. IMHO, it shouldn't E. g., try adding
exec /tmp/boincxhost.log
set -x
at the top of your script. That should give debug
On 2013-11-18 16:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker.
Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and other branches
as other changes permit.
[cut]
leamas:BADURL:lpf-0-d18db6d.tar.gz:lpf
[cut]
Hm... That url is
Source0:
On 2013-11-18 17:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:08:56 +0100
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-11-18 16:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker.
Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and
other
On 11/14/2013 11:12 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 05:01 -0500, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
Hello guys,
I have one source which has the form of (in the last part of it's URI):
checklist-cce-feed?id=295 (the source doesn't seem to be available
otherwise
than via
On 2013-11-01 11:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
[cut ]
on multi-user systems it is *intentional* that the user does *not* install
software at it's own and if this should be the case the admin *one time*
will add a directory to PATH and say there you go
[cut]
Not necessarily (or even most often)
On 2013-11-01 13:16, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.11.2013 13:00, schrieb Petr Viktorin:
In both cases, everything the user had access to is compromised, including
.bash_profile itself. What other
*security* impact did you have in mind?
when i learned something about security than that the
On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 02:03, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
[root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mkdir test
i could rm -rf ~/ here
[root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /usr/local/bin/mkdir
#!/bin/bash
echo i could rm -rf ~/ here
If I
On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 02:03, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
[root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mkdir test
i could rm -rf ~/ here
[root
On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 02:03, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei
On 2013-10-30 11:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 11:27, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald
On 2013-10-30 12:25, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 11:55, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 11:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 11:27, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald
On 2013-10-30 13:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 13:00, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 12:25, Reindl Harald wrote:
i gave you a starting point to learn about security and the reason
for sftp-chroot doing so is that someone could use race-conditions
to bypass the security
if you do
On 2013-10-30 15:05, Christopher wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas:
Some kind
On 2013-10-30 15:50, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/30/2013 03:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 15:29, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 10/30/2013 01:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Besides that, what and where users put things underneath of $HOME is
not a distro's busness
[cut]
Is it really
On 2013-10-29 10:56, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/29/2013 08:07 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 10/28/2013 09:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:28:01AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
* Tue Jun 07 2011 Roman Rakus … - 4.2.10-3
- Added $HOME/.local/bin to PATH in .bash_profile
On 2013-10-29 11:44, Alec Leamas wrote:
[cut]
BTW, don't we also lack a default, user-controlled directory for
manpages? Shouldn't ~/.local/share/man be part of user's default
MANPATH? Same usecase, basically same solution...
[Answering myself...] We, we don't lack that. As of f20
On 10/28/2013 07:08 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2013-10-28 at 11:28 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Michael Schwendt wrote:
/home/sandro/.local/bin in the PATH is not the default.
Or is it new for Rawhide?
$ grep PATH /etc/skel/.bash_profile
On 10/27/2013 12:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 01:54:44 + (UTC), Ben Boeckel wrote:
I also wouldn't mind seeing a list of FE-NEEDSPONSOR bugs be emailed to
devel@ (similar to the ownership change email). Open reviews might be
nice as well, but maybe just FE-NEEDSPONSOR
On 10/27/2013 07:43 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:43:57 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
Or, email not all FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets but only those which are
deemed too old to be OK.
When would that be?
A recurring problem in the review queue is long response time
On 2013-10-25 01:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 11:51 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 10/12/2013 09:55 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
cx18-firmware -- Firmware for Conexant cx23418-based video capture
devices
libcrystalhd
On 2013-10-17 04:30, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 10/16/2013 07:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
If your package uses the %configure macro, I would feel free to close
them as either invalid or fixed as that macro handles it. If your
package doesn't, you have more checking/work to do.
Thanks for
On 2013-10-17 08:18, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 08:16:40 +0200
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for replying- this slipped through my inbox. You can also
see if your package was built successfully by visiting
http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/stage4/http
On 10/12/2013 09:55 AM, Till Maas wrote:
[cut]
The packages are now orphaned, so please pick them up.
Regards
Till
I have picked lirc.
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
is the
commit log at https://github.com/leamas/lirc-pkg. Otherwise, here is the
changelog:
%changelog
* Thu Oct 10 2013 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@nowhere.net - 0.9.0-15
- Actually use sysconfig files (881976)
- Modify lirc.service to not fork.
- Add support for iguanaIR driver (#954146).
- Add
On 2013-10-01 19:50, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
Jarod Wilson, the current lirc maintainer, announced that he wants
someone else to maintain lirc due to lack of time/interest[0]. Probably
his other four packages need a new maintainer as, well[1]:
[cut]
Please respond here, if you want to take a
On 2013-10-07 13:56, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
Hi Jóhann,
I do agree with you that the interaction between Red Hat and Fedora
needs to be clearer, and that currently it is a bit vaguely defined and
thus it gives ground to conspiracy theories and feelings of
disenfranchisement.
On 2013-10-06 15:13, Rave it wrote:
Am Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:59:20 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:50:45 +0200
From: Till Maas opensou...@till.name
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc:
On 10/03/2013 11:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[cut]
leamas:BADURL:xlwt-0.7.4.tar.gz:python-xlwt
[cut]
These are pypi urls which looks just fine to me (spectool -g works OK)
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
On 2013-09-11 11:11, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 10:41, schrieb Ankur Sinha:
- These software inform and take permission from the user before opening
ports in the firewall.
IMHO it should be the job of the firewall to inform the user about an
application that want's to open one or more
On 2013-09-11 12:02, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 11 septembre 2013 11:23, Alec Leamas a écrit :
On 2013-09-11 11:11, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 10:41, schrieb Ankur Sinha:
- These software inform and take permission from the user before
opening
ports in the firewall.
IMHO it should
On 2013-09-11 15:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 06:35 AM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 12:30, schrieb Alec Leamas:
That said, I see your point. Seems to boil down to that only
On 2013-09-11 15:41, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/11/2013 03:32 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-09-11 15:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Asking her Do you want to make security changes to share directory
/home/phyllis
On 2013-09-10 23:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.09.2013 22:58, schrieb Heiko Adams:
Am 10.09.2013 22:07, schrieb Peter Oliver:
Empathy's People Nearby feature doesn't work out of the box because
the required ports are blocked by default by the firewall
On 2013-09-03 07:21, Richard Vickery wrote:
I used to do this by scrolling up through the commands, but it's no
longer there: I don't know if I remember it correctly:
sudo yum upgrade updates.testing R
Do I have this correct, or am I missing something? I don't want to
forge ahead fearing that
On 2013-09-03 07:21, Richard Vickery wrote:
I used to do this by scrolling up through the commands, but it's no
longer there: I don't know if I remember it correctly:
sudo yum upgrade updates.testing R
Do I have this correct, or am I missing something? I don't want to
forge ahead fearing that
So, I need somehelp with getting 957339 reviewed, and is willing to make
a review (possibly two simple) in return.
The package might look daunting, but it's just a rename.
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
On 2013-08-28 18:09, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm trying to make a spec file that uses the devtoolset in RHEL 5/6 (
rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0175.html ) but I haven't been able
to figure out how to enable devtoolset in the spec file. If I run 'scl
enable devtoolset-1.1 bash' before doing
On 08/26/2013 09:14 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hi.
26.08.2013 16:19, Alec Leamas wrote:
As agreed [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all packages in
current rawhide. The results are now available at [2]. Here are
reports on issues by package and packages by issue.
May be it could
As agreed [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all packages in
current rawhide. The results are now available at [2]. Here are reports
on issues by package and packages by issue.
We have discussed sending email about these results to the package
owners. Is this a good idea? In any
On 08/26/2013 03:38 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
One more...
http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/tree/packages/qastools
CheckDesktopFileInstall
-- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install
-- if there is such a file.
The project installs it's own so I'm using
On 08/26/2013 03:50 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com
mailto:panem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Alec Leamas
leamas.a...@gmail.com mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
As agreed [1
On 08/26/2013 04:12 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
A script typo in README:
13733 packagea
are reported here.
should be:
13733 packages
are reported here.
Here, the review is tough. Fixed, thanks!
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08/26/2013 03:25 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Alec,
I'm not sure if I'm getting a false positive or not. My package
nec2c[1] says it's got a md5sum error with the source but I always use
curl to download the sources (unless it's a github source and I use
links). I just re-downloaded the source
On 08/26/2013 04:38 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
On 26 August 2013 13:19, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
As agreed [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all packages
in current rawhide. The results are now available at [2]. Here are
reports
In an attempt to test fedora-review we have run it on almost allpackages
in the complete rawhide distribution. Our primary objective is to
certify that fedora-review is stable for all this kind of input. Also,
these test reveals some false warnings and other errors. Some are
detected and
On 2013-08-22 15:41, Richard Shaw wrote:
Very interesting...
What's the possibility of parsing all the data and sending individual
reports to package-owner@ ?
I don't know that I'd want to get this type of thing frequently, but
once would be nice...
Richard
The data is already
On 2013-08-22 15:54, Richard Shaw wrote:
Yes... sorry I assumed you knew...
package-ow...@fedoraproject.org mailto:ow...@fedoraproject.org
Richard
No, I don't know much.
Well, it should basically be piece of cake to generate such an email for
all packages. Before doing such a thing I would
On 2013-08-22 17:45, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
In an attempt to test fedora-review we have run it on almost allpackages
in the complete rawhide distribution. Our primary objective is to
certify that fedora-review is stable for all this kind
On 2013-08-22 19:20, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
The overall results with some comments are at http://ur1.ca/f5xxw .
The CheckSoFiles results might be .so plug-in libs (extension modules),
which are stored in private paths, i.e. outside run
Seems that this bug [1], together with yesterday's libvoikko issue has
opened a can of worms. Since the discussion seems to be rather general,
it might make sense to continue here on the list.
Trying to summarize some aspects, the first is how we make the decision
what plugin(s) to run:
- If
PLease disregard previous message on this issue. Wrong list.
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 2013-06-20 14:19, Jonathan Masters wrote:
Indeed. This was a concern I raised when we first began the bootstrap. Blindly
rerunning autoreconf in every case is a really bad idea. But doing it in a
discretionary way, allowing the package maintainer to influence what happens
(they in theory
On 2013-06-17 16:43, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com wrote:
I completely agree to this. Using `autoreconf -fi` in %build or %prep
should be mandatory in packages using autotools. This will surely avoid
lots of possible problems caused by
101 - 200 of 295 matches
Mail list logo
