Perfect. Thank you.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
I appreciate the response. Would you mind pointing me to Miro's latest FTBS
announcement?
This list was emailed to me again on July 25, and it still identified a problem
with xmvn-connector-ivy.
___
devel mailing list --
After reading through this list multiple times, I am having trouble
understanding if there is anything that needs to be done in my case.
This list flags the package I maintain, combozola:
>cambozola (maintained by: kni)
> cambozola-0.936-20.fc38.noarch requires
Does anyone know how to contact Pete Travis a.k.a. immanetize?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112660
Here is the activity report from fedora-active-user:
Last login in FAS:
immanetize 2021-01-21
Last action on koji:
Tue, 28 Jun 2022 tag_package_owners entry created by bodhi
Thank you, and done.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
I don't know where to report this, so I'm doing it here.
The backend server that is hosting admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ is
throwing an HTTP 500 SSL handshake error.
This prevents us from using fedora_active_user.py
___
devel mailing list --
I have recently been granted maintainership of the libcec package, and plan to
clean up the open bugs assigned to it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466166
This is an old bug from 2017 requesting the existing libcec 3.1 package be
replaced with libcec 4.0.7.
libcec 4.0.7 mock
In accordance with the Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I am attempting
to contact
Mohamed ElMorabity a.k.a. melmorabity.
Does anyone know how to contact this package maintainer?
This is in reference to these open bugs with perl-XML-TreeBuilder:
In accordance with the Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I am attempting
to contact Rüdiger Landmann a.k.a. rlandmann.
Does anyone know how to contact this package maintainer?
This is in reference to perl-XML-TreeBuilder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977273
Update: the appears to only be an issue with the aarch64 build so that explains
why I can't duplicate it on my x86_64 machine.
Looking closer at the aarch64 build output, reveals the rpath is being inserted
via libtool:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -O2 -flto=auto
The fgci package I maintain is failing the rpath check:
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libfcgi++.so.0.0.0' contains a standard
'/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/cgi-fcgi' contains a standard '/usr/lib64' in
[/usr/lib64]
New policy change is documented well here:
Thanks Mikolaj - Just saw your reply and have added you as an admin.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Looks like jakarta-mail affects quite a few packages. I have taken it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
A typical epel8 build request for one of mythtv's (RPMFusion) runtime
requirements, pmount, has been filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941159
The previous epel maintainer responded quickly, gave me collaborator status,
and then promptly removed himself from the package.
That's
Understood. Thank you for the fast response.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
I was recently granted collaborator status for the pmount package.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pmount
I did the usual. I requested the epel8 branch then built the package:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1726469
However, when I use fedpkg to push an update I get:
>$
Yes, that's right. So why wouldn't the package show on the overview page in the
epel 7 branch then?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
How can a package exist in an epel repo but not be reflected at
src.fedoraproject.org/rpms?
For example, according this, mkvtoolnix should not exist in EPEL:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mkvtoolnix
Except it does:
> $ repoquery -i mkvtoolnix
> Name: mkvtoolnix
> Version :
Thanks for the heads up.
A couple of my Bodhi updates have "failed to talk to Greenwave" and Greewave is
on the list of affected services shown in that pagure issue. Not sure if I need
to resubmit the affected packages at a later date. I guess we will just wait
and see.
Looking for someone to review the following python package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242
It's not complicated by any means.
I'll be glad to review another package in return. Thank you.
___
devel mailing list --
perl-Net-SFTP-Foreign has been taken!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Done, and thank you. I thought I was losing my mind!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758891
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
I am the maintainer of the netatalk package. It has an optional build
dependency on tracker-devel, but this subpackage does not currently exist in
el8 repos.
The primary package, tracker-2.1.5-1.el8, can be installed, but I need the
header files from -devel. I've extracted the spec file from
One of the nice things about Netatalk is that it fully emulates an Apple Time
Machine Volume. Mac clients don't know the difference. This is in contrast to
emulating a time machine volume through NFS. Using NFS for time machine backups
does not have quite the same user experience. That might
Thanks! I'll get on it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
I've got a couple of review requests in need of a reviewer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659709
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199
These are pretty straightforward. Nothing terribly complicated. I would be glad
to review someone else's review request(s) to
Sorry for the noise. This was meant for the rpmfusion devel list.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
FYI, new ZoneMinder packages representing the 1.32.3 release are building now
for Fedora branches.
I will push a new package for el7 branch after Antonio completes his work with
new ffmpeg & x264.
___
devel mailing list --
Somehow I knew this question was documented somewhere in the giant book of
Fedora. I just couldn't find it. Thanks for pointing it out.
Thanks everyone for the fast response. I'll wait another week before taking
action, and when I do I'll make sure to file a releng ticket to get it
unblocked.
Recently I began to create a review request for netatalk, when I noticed there
already was an open review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520024
May 7th was the last activity by anyone other than myself. On 11/28 I offered
assistance to help move the review along, but I
Greetings,
Do you have a package that needs are reviewer? Would you be willing to do a
review swap?
I'm looking to have the following perl module reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417316
There isn't much to this module so the review should be pretty straightforward.
While
Oh hey, I just now saw all the replies to my original message. Guess I better
check my profile settings. Thank you Kevin, for fixing this!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Tried the build again this afternoon, and it was successful. No idea what
caused the problem. Guess I'll just assume this had something to do with other
recent Koji build issues.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
BACKGROUND
I am attempting to build perl-Sort-Key-1.32-4.el6.src.rpm for inclusion into
epel6. This is a rebuild of the f20 branch. The newer 1.33 version of sort::key
requires a newer version of make::maker, which is why 1.32 was chosen.
I can locally mock build and install this module w/o any
UPDATE: I just completed my first two new package requests:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409869
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409866
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Greetings fellow Fedora enthusiasts,
I'm just getting started and thought I'd introduce myself.
I am part of the upstream ZoneMinder project
(https://github.com/ZoneMinder/ZoneMinder), and I also maintain
zmrepo.zoneminder.com, as a single source to install the ZoneMinder rpm and its
36 matches
Mail list logo
