On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 10:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> (The subject line referes to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3418SeWZfQ)
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure
> that the package
s with version info? something else?
>
> Ben
>
>
>
> Sent with ProtonMail <https://protonmail.com> Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Monday, December 28, 2020 1:53 PM, Andy Mender <
> andymenderu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 28 D
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 21:12, FreedomBen via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've read a crap ton of pages now about package creation/maintenance but
> feel like I'm missing stuff and spinning wheels so I wanted to ask. The
> process seems pretty muddled :-D
>
> I've
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 21:40, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> that's 90 of the 251 who still have provenpackager privileges, but
> haven't run any kind of Koji build since at least 2019-01-01 (if you
> check, it turns out many of them haven't run a build since long before
> then). Many of them, to my
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 15:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
> packages
> will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching
> (February
> 2021).
>
> Policy:
>
>
Hello,
Recently, I picked the python-pykafka package, since it was orphaned.
Unfortunately, upon closer inspection I noticed it has been neglected quite
a bit.
During the build process, it would download several dependencies via "pip"
which were not listed as BuildRequires in the SPEC file. 3 of
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 19:52, LinuxGeek46 wrote:
> Hello - my name is David Both and I want to introduce myself. Ankur Sinha
> "FranciscoD" is mentoring me as I start with Fedora Fusion package
> maintenance.
>
> I have been working with computers for just a bit over 50 years now, and
> almost
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:42, Sohan Kunkerkar wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> Good day! I hope everyone is keeping well in these unprecedented and
> difficult times.
> My name is Sohan Kunkerkar and I'm a software engineer at Red Hat Inc
> helping to develop and maintain a container-focused operating
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:55, Robin Opletal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is Robin Opletal, I am from the Czech Republic and online I tend
> to go under the name of "fourstepper".
>
> I would like to help out with maintaining packages of interest for
> Fedora, currently, I am interested in getting
Hello,
The license of coolreader was previously set to GPLv2 in the SPEC file,
however per the short discussion in a related thread, it was always GPLv2+:
https://github.com/buggins/coolreader/issues/80
This was now amended and a PR with the license file itself submitted to
upstream:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 22:43, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I filed https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2512 asking FESCo to move all
> automated emails to a separate list where people who want to follow
> can, while I was part of the proliferation of compose reports coming
> here, there is now a
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 20:07, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ibus-anthy_for_default_Japanese_IME
>
> == Summary ==
> The current default Japanese IME(input method engine) is ibus-kkc and
> the default is going to change to ibus-anthy to develop Japanese IME
> more
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 12:12, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 11:57, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> openstack-sig is reviewing the list of packages maintained in Fedora and
> we've found that following packages can be retired from Fedora as they are
> not longer used or required by any other package or OpenStack:
>
>
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 14:14, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 13:07:06 +0100, Andy Mender wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hiya Ankur!
>
> Hi Andy!
>
> > I reviewed your package. No swap expected, but could you push your
> > gargi-fonts package to Rawhide?
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 11:07, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I hope everyone is safe and doing well.
>
> python-meautility is a new dependency needed to update python-lfpy to
> its latest release, so I've packaged it up and submitted a package
> review here:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 17:28, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultPipeWire
>
> == Summary ==
> This change proposal is to route all audio from PulseAudio and JACK to
> the PipeWire Audio
> daemon by default.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Wtaymans| Wim Taymans]]
>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 16:17, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 11/16/20 11:31 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > The logic behind the NEEDINFO stuff may need to be updated... The
>> subject says
>> > it all and it's quite annoying.
>> >
>> >
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 13:02, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Upstream relicensed and dropped an old BSD code in 4.06 release. Hence the
> RPM package changes license from "BSD and LGPLv2+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2+"
> to "LGPLv2+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2+".
>
> -- Petr
>
> Thanks for the heads-up! :)
On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 10:54, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I want to unretire foo2zjs and its direct dependency argyllcms.
>
> These packages require re-review:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889072
>
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 23:17, Lyes Saadi wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> In order to package dialect[1], I'm unretiring python-googletrans[2].
>
> Since this package was released for more than a year now, I am going
> through a re-review[3].
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Lyes Saadi
>
>
> [1]:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Elliott Sales de Andrade <
quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The license tag on python-cligj appears to have always been wrongly
> tagged as MIT. I have now corrected it to BSD in Rawhide while
> updating to its latest beta, and will let this trickle down to other
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 11:22, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 14:04:43 +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> >
> >
> > Reviewed and approved! Good job!
>
> Thanks for the quick review, Andy. Please do let me know if I can help
> review your packages any time.
>
On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 at 15:24, Kai A. Hiller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> what ways are there to let other maintainers know that I need them to
> update a package? What is the preferred way to do it? Some ways that came
> to my mind are:
>
>- PR with the required changes to their package
>-
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Another really simple single binary package for NeuroFedora is ready for
> review:
> mod2c: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886957
>
> This is required to build the optimised CoreNeuron component of the
> NEURON simulator.
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 04:10, wrote:
> The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has
> been
> waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take
> action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these
> bugs
> might already be closed,
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 22:47, Rafael Jeffman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am involved in the development of ansible-freeipa (
> https://github.com/freeipa/ansible-freeipa) and plan to co-maintain it
> for Fedora.
>
> Years ago I helped with the development and packages for an alternative
> Linux
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 11:53, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was in contact with Sebastian, who used to work for RH and maintained
> several Fedora packages. However, due to chances in his live, he decided to
> orphan his packages. Since he is not subscribed to fedora-devel ML, I'm
> forwarding
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 18:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
> "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org.
>
> Bugzilla describes "QA Contact" as:
>
> "The person responsible for confirming this bug if it is unconfirmed,
>
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 03:27, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> On 2020-09-19 1:32 p.m., Andy Mender wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 22:27, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 3:16 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello team,
>>
On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 22:27, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 3:16 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
> wrote:
>
>> Hello team,
>>
>> openvdb is updated to 7.1.0 in Rawhide and luxcorerender needs to switch
>> to -std=c++14 similar to that upstream ticket:
>>
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 12:04, Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got some packages that I do not have any use for anymore and I'd like
> to give them away. If noone wants them I'll retire and orphan them in ~ a
> week.
>
> python-bna: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-bna
>
>
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 12:16, Dhanesh B. Sabane
wrote:
> Hey Andy!
>
> > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 07:44, Dhanesh B. Sabane
> > wrote:
> >
> > If there are no takers, I'd like to maintain the python-blindspinner
> > package. I see there is some room to bring in its "click" dependencies.
>
> I've
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 07:44, Dhanesh B. Sabane
wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I've been away from all Fedora activities for quite some time and I
> don't see a return anytime soon. There are 6 Python packages which are
> maintained by me and I'd like to hand them over. Following is the list
> of
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 11:46, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Friday, 04 September 2020 at 11:00, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > I'm looking at cleaning up some parts of the QEMU spec and we have
> > conditionals in there testing for s390 arch (aka 32-bit). IIRC
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 14:22, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> Fabio Valentini 于2020年8月31日周一 下午7:54写道：
> > I'm getting *pretty annoyed* with a similar (but way worse) issue as
> well:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049
> >
> > It's worse because there are way more spam comments and they
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 12:10, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am going to bring fcitx5 to fedora, fcitx5 is the next generation
> for fcitx and upstream decided to treat fcitx and fcitx5 as a
> different project (different git repo, different file paths and names
> and configuration files).
Hello all :)
I was just going through the swath of "needinfo cancelled" emails and a
certain package piqued my interest:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289070
Just wanted to clarify, if I'm interested in this package, the closed bug
report should not be re-opened and instead I
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 19:30, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We've got quite a few unmaintained repos on COPR under the neuro-sig
> group. I intend to do a bit of housekeeping to remove projects there
> that aren't in use any more. Please take a look and let me know if you
> do not want me to
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 21:42, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 August 2020 11:45:13 CEST Andy Mender wrote:
> > On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 18:55, Benjamin Lowry wrote:
> > > I've created a review request to unretire rgbds:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.
On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 18:55, Benjamin Lowry wrote:
> I've created a review request to unretire rgbds:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862705
>
> -ben
>
Nice, GameBoy development! I'll review it. Do you need a sponsor? I'm not
senior enough to be one, but perhaps someone else
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 15:51, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
> On 28/07/20 22:46 +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> >Dear Fedorians,
> >
> >I really need some help with a review of a GCC toolchain variant I've
> >started recently: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
Dear Fedorians,
I really need some help with a review of a GCC toolchain variant I've
started recently: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884
A Koji build of the most recent SRPM:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48035045
Some minor issues have been fixed
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 at 09:11, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 22:29 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Just upgraded a development machine to:
> >
> > binutils-2.34.0-10.fc33.x86_64
> > gcc-10.1.1-2.fc33.x86_64
> > glibc-2.31.9000-21.fc33.x86_64
> >
> > and a very simple C compile
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 22:14, Mohamed El Morabity
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm the maintainer of the nicotine+ package. This package was retired
> before F32 branching last year (no Python 3 support at this time) and
> I unretired it after a review request and a unretirement request
> ticket to
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 23:15, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like some help to review:
> - libavif: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858419
>
> - qt-avif-image-plugin:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858639
>
> I can swap with anything.
>
>
Took
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 at 18:09, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 5:39 AM Andy Mender
> wrote:
> >
> >On updates, a single automatic corrupted snapshot can
> > potentially hose the entire snapshotted volume.
>
> How do you mean? If this is a sort of super
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 16:14, Ludovic Hirlimann via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm ludo. I've been involved with opensource for a long time now (using
> my first linux in 1996). I have been a mozilla employee for 10 years (as
> the Thunderbird QA lead and then as an
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 04:53, John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
> On Thursday, July 16, 2020 2:37:55 PM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > F33 Change proposal: Replace Linux kernel with BSD kernel - System-Wide
>
> Well, which BSD kernel? ;)
>
>
> This email just serves as a neat example of that potential new
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 14:44, Germano Massullo
wrote:
> All desktop oriented Fedora installers install on the system packages:
> hunspell
> hunspell-en
> hunspell-en-GB
> hunspell-en-US
>
> When a user opens the language list of the spell checker, is has ~24
> different English options, like
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 18:05, Neal Becker wrote:
> I think if we really want to advocate for btrfs, we also should provide
> the
> tools to take full advantage of it. I've been using btrfs since it was
> offered as an option on Fedora. On Ubuntu, there is a tool "snapper" to
> help manage
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 21:47, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> %build
> %cmake \
>-B build \
>-DUSE_BOOST_WAVE=ON \
>-DUSE_PARTIO=OFF \
>-DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=14 \
>-DLLVM_STATIC=0 \
>-DENABLERTTI=ON \
>-DSTOP_ON_WARNING=OFF \
>-DOSL_BUILD_MATERIALX:BOOL=ON \
>
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 17:26, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 16:23 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > W dniu 30.06.2020 o 15:34, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson pisze:
> > > Given Hans proposal [1] introduced systemd/grub2/Gnome upstream
> > > changes it beg the question if now would not
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 18:37, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> IMBW, but I think I recall the Python packaging guidelines specifically
> said that you could or should (I forget which) just BR python-devel and
> not BR python-setuptools at some point. At this point there seems to be
> no explicit
On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 at 00:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 06. 20 23:11, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > All make invocations in spec files that don't use the install target
> will be
> > modified to use the %make_build macro
>
> Many Python packages build Sphinx documentation with variant of "make
>
> - Copr project "runtime" dependencies were implemented. Newly you can
> specify set of repositories your project depends on. Such repositories
> will be installed together with the copr project repo file (e.g., by
> 'dnf copr enable YOU/YOUR_PROEJCT'). Those repositories can be other
>
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 20:47, Igor Raits
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 20:38 +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> > Howdy everyone!
> >
> > Some time ago we discussed the misuse of the make %{?_smp_mflags}
> > cons
Howdy everyone!
Some time ago we discussed the misuse of the make %{?_smp_mflags} construct
and that one should switch to %build_make. I tried that and all of my COPR
builds failed completely. Here's a log from one of them:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 07:10, Igor Raits
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 02:21 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > == Summary ==
> > > %cmake macro will be adjusted (-B
> > > parameter)
> > > to use separate build folder
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 04:58, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> Blender 2.83.0 successfuly built on all but one architecture: armv7h.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1522859
>
> Could these maintainers investigate the cause ? I intend to temporarly
> exclude it
Hiya,
As someone who is trying to get into packaging in Fedora, I would really
really appreciate the docs being less dispersed:
- https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package
-
>
> LXQt as a general project:
> rpms/featherpad
> rpms/libfm-qt
> rpms/liblxqt
> rpms/liblxqt-mount
> rpms/light-locker
> rpms/lximage-qt
> rpms/lxmenu-data
> rpms/lxqt-about
> rpms/lxqt-admin
> rpms/lxqt-build-tools
> rpms/lxqt-common
> rpms/lxqt-config
> rpms/lxqt-config-randr
>
If I understand correctly, the sudden disappearance of llvm7.0 means that
now ghc is in danger as a package, because it's missing the toolchain
needed to build & package it?
I did a quick `dnf search llvm` and I see the following on my main Fedora
32 box:
llvm5.0.i686 : The Low Level Virtual
Hello everyone!
Introduction:
After reading the Fedora docs on packaging, I decided I would like to join
the Fedora project initially as a package maintainer/reviewer and perhaps
later as a source code committer. Here's the bug report for the package I'd
like to revive/unorphan:
64 matches
Mail list logo
