On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:20 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> 2) Mock now supports subscription-manager, which allows you to build
> packages for RHEL with cost-free developer license.
> No need to wait for CentOS 8.
>
Does this work when using Fedora as the base system? subscription-manager
is avail
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 2:04 AM Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Duplicated dependencies is a problem because rpm-md becomes larger. If
> we would use Requires: python%{python3_version}dist() dependencies,
> then RPM would merge them and it would be fine. But since we use
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:38 PM Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> You can't make it work in EPEL easily because python modules do not
> have pythonX.Ydist() provides.
>
Didn't realize that and not sure why that wasn't backported. Honestly, if
we aren't going to be consis
bled per package, but isn't the point of this to save
effort. Seems like it just creates more work for other people.
Avram
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:55 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:34:02AM -0500, Avram Lubkin wrote:
> > Lo
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:48 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> python-rpm-generators is not the real upstream for that code (rpm is).
> And testability would be a bit difficult because all the script does
> is pull stuff from python module metadata using setuptools and print it
> out.
>
So you provide tes
Looks like the dependency generator was turned on in rawhide. Igor has been
making pull releases against packages because this is now creating
duplicate requires for some packages. That would seem reasonable, but he
never pushed the dependency generator to EPEL so packages which maintain a
common s
rry, I have no interest in EPEL packages, so I didn't respond.
>
> If you would like to maintain it, I will happily add you as comaintainer.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018, 16:11 Avram Lubkin
>> I've been trying to reach the maintainers for python-ldap3
>> (ignatenkobrai
I've been trying to reach the maintainers for python-ldap3 (ignatenkobrain,
mcyprian) for the last month. I've sent multiple emails, submitted pull
requests[1] [2], and a bug [3]. fedora_active_user.py shows occasional
activity for ignatenkobrain. Does anyone know how to contact either
maintainer?
>
> Currently you should run this:
> fedpkg retire "This is an EPEL only package"
> in both the master and f28 branches.
>
Makes sense, but is this documented anywhere?
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> >>>>> "AL
We had issues, Bug 1600418, because python3-dns, which is intended only for
EPEL7, was included in the mass rebuild for 28 and had an f28 branch
created. Now it's been included in the f29 mass rebuild. How do we keep
this from happening?
Avram
___
devel
Badges are pretty popular in GitHub though there don't seem to be many that
provide information on distros that have packages for a project. This would
be very useful because, at least for me, the first thing I do when I want
to try a new project is see if a package is available for the distro I'm
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Avram Lubkin wrote:
> Forcing the pdftex driver gives an error about missing pdf primitives,
> so this is most probably related to the removed pdf primitives in LuaTeX
> 0.85 and later.
>
texlive-luatex85 provides luatex85.sty which might solv
Seems like this issue is almost a year old.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Avram Lubkin
> wrote:
> >
> > I've noticed this a lot lately. I get a bugzilla for a new release in
> > upstream, but it lists the
I've noticed this a lot lately. I get a bugzilla for a new release in
upstream, but it lists the current version in rawhide as the el7
distribution. The rebase helper build fails because of something not
supported in 7, like a Recommends tag. This is exactly what I'm seeing with
the latest python-s
Frankly I think upstream should have called it py3doc_enhanced and left out
sphinx and theme, but that's beside the point.
Based on the package naming conventions [1], you name is mainly correct
(more on this later). In the Python modules section [2], it says:
The package name should reflect the
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> It sounds like I should start trying to get sphinxcontrib-adadomain
> ported to Python 3.
>
Definitely!
> I have two possible fixes:
> >
> > The first would be to decouple the commands from the libraries. Since
> > the package name sphinx
I'm a co-maintainer for the python-sphinx package. There's a bug [1] I'd
like to address, but I'd like some input on what I was thinking. There was
some discussion about this on FPC ticket [2], but nothing workable really
came out of that. I also attempted to get input [3] from the Sphinx
community
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Haïkel wrote:
> 2016-06-30 4:59 GMT+02:00 Avram Lubkin :
> >
> > I've been trying to contact Salimma, Michel Alexandre Salim, for the last
> > month. I've been trying to update python-sphinx which hasn't had an
> update
>
I've been trying to contact Salimma, Michel Alexandre Salim, for the last
month. I've been trying to update python-sphinx which hasn't had an update
since last fall. Worked through all of the issues, but maintainer hasn't
responded to commit request, email, or bug reports.
Bug report for newest ve
I have a couple of simple Python packages that need to be reviewed. Will
review yours in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347006:
python-sphinxcontrib-spelling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340619: python-imagesize
Thanks,
Avram
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
As many others have expressed, third-party RPMs tend to be done very
poorly, Oracle Java is a good bad example. That said, if it's something a
user wants to install on their system, that's their prerogative, but it's
not part of Fedora and shouldn't be. What we could do is make it easier to
install
I'd suggest running pylint against the packages and skipping anything below
a certain threshold. There are currently over 80,000 packages on PyPi and
the vast majority are poorly written.
I think a more worthwhile effort would be to use the PyPi package rankings (
http://pypi-ranking.info/alltime)
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
>
>
> On 05/12/2016 08:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:36:32AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>
>>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default
>>> reposdir =
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wik
Hello, I'm Avram. I just submitted my first package, python-scandir. I've
been a system engineer working with Linux for the last 10 years. Several
years ago, in what seems like another life, I worked for Red Hat. Now I'm
an independent consultant while I work on a project I'll be releasing as
open
24 matches
Mail list logo
