Prior art in https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/pull/243 for
reference
Christian Glombek (he/him)
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/Engeldamm+64b,+10179+Berlin/@52.5058176,13.4191433,17z/data=!3m1!4b
I can take package `colm`
FAS id: lorbus
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
I'm opposed to this change as well, due to, imo, making it harder/less
obvious/more confusing to see
where I have to pull from any given package that I want to consume as an
end-user on my system,
or as a package maintainer in my buildroot.
I've however found myself having to maintain packages
so!
[1] https://github.com/nextcloud/documentation
Best regards
Christian Glombek
Software Engineer
OKD Working Group Co-Chair
Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/Engeldamm+64b,+10179+Berlin/@52.5058176,13.4191433,17z/data=!3m1!4b
This is excellent news! Thank you, Iván!
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 9:34 PM Ivan Chavero wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 1:43 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 08. 02. 20 20:29, Ivan Chavero wrote:
>> > The nextcloud package updated for 18.0.0 is now on rawhide, 31 and 30 ,
>> sorry
>> > for the
Please retire the package now.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:10 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 1/17/20 11:53 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 30. 11. 19 2:27, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> >> Yes i'm going to update it to the newest version this weekend
> >>
> >> thanks for following up!
> >
> >
On a side note (and without reading all of the above in detail), I'd like
to note that Fedora CoreOS (aka FCOS) is completely Python free by now -
probably not achievable for Desktop, but it may be for IoT.
Miroslav Suchý schrieb am Do., 16. Jan. 2020, 16:35:
> Dne 15. 01. 20 v 18:05 Miro
Thanks for taking this on, Ivan!
However, I do think the package should either be updated to a non-EOL
version right now, or orphaned for the time being as to not let users
install this ancient version that they'll never be able to update.
Unfortunately, I don't have time to chime in myself at
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:27 PM John Harris wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 6:18:41 AM MST Christian Glombek wrote:
> > Right now, one can do something like `dnf
> > --installroot=/mnt/new-buildah-root group install custom-environment`
> > to create a root for a co
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:09 PM Tristan Cacqueray
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 01:22 John Harris wrote:
> [snip]
> > No online updates is the exact issue I see with this. That's a security
> nightmare.
> >
> > If you don't have a package manager there, it simply will not be
> updated.
> >
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 5:26 PM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, at 3:52 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> > If you want small images, just use buildah.
>
> Dockerfile-based multi-stage builds are significantly more popular than
> this and should really be mentioned first.
>
> I'm not
Whoop this is great!
But I wonder why the scratch build sizes have gone up this dramatically in
f31?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 10:59 AM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 11:24 PM Clement Verna
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 20:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>> >
instead of %systemd_requires and ensuring that tmpfiles,users, etc are
created in the container as well (anything encoded in systemd unit files
essentially).)
Christian Glombek
Associate Software Engineer
Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/Engeldamm+6
interest!
[1] https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/186
Christian Glombek
Associate Software Engineer
Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/Engeldamm+64b,+10179+Berlin/@52.5058176,13.4191433,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47a84e3
This is an interesting question and I would like to back the idea of making
this available on COPR.
My 2 cents:
The package *itself* complies to COPR's licensing guidelines, making it
eligible for distribution via that service, while the runtime dependency of
MatLAB makes it an uneligible
some improvements to be made, but it'll certainly be ready by the
time F30 is coming.
WDYT?
Thank you Javier to pointing me to this.
Regards,
Christian Glombek
FAS Lorbus
Am Sa., 30. Juni 2018 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Nicolas Mailhot <
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net>:
> Le samedi 30 juin 201
Hello Germano,
I've been doing some packaging work for nextcloud 13+ in Fedora (not so
much recently, although I just started to get some missing deps of NC 14
packaged and reviewed).
I could probably invest the occasional hour or two for the new spec, so
feel free to sign me up. My GH nick is
Totally agreed. I'd expect having streams for each major would
somewhat mitigate this.
Adam Williamson schrieb am Mi., 4. Apr. 2018
um 01:02 Uhr:
> On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 15:25 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > One question comes to mind though - won't this be a problem
I'm definitely a fan of modules and streams!
I'm also a fan of not having to package v11 and v12 ;)
Recently, I've made some non-code PRs to NextCloud in order to streamline
their dependency declarations & mgmt in general (see
https://github.com/nextcloud/server/issues/8555 & ref'd PRs). It used
I should probably add that the actual updater program has not been shipped in
the rpms thus far. Although I'm not sure how this affects major updates, it is
leading to problems elsewhere (i.e. people have to uninstall some apps on v13
and re-install them on v13.0.1 for them to work again).
And
Yup, that, essentially.
Some deps that are needed for these versions are already outdated and have
newer, incompatible versions in the Fedora rpm repos.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
For reference:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433919
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nextcloud/pull-request/3
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello!
I'd be happy to maintain NextCloud!
I have already done the packaging work for NC v13 and v13.0.1, and various
dependencies.
Unfortunately there is no upgrade path from the EOL'd v10 rpm that is in
Fedora right now, which seems to be somewhat of a blocker. I'd happily
support upgrades from
Thank you all for the warm welcome! :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Matthew!
Nice to have you on board :)
Cheers,
Chris
Charalampos Stratakis schrieb am Mo., 5. Feb. 2018 um
11:05 Uhr:
> Hello Matthew and welcome!
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Matthew Ruszczyk"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello World!
My name is Christian Glombek (or simply Chris :) and I'd like to join the
Fedora Packagers Group. I'm currently a student of Electrical Engineering
and Business Management at RWTH University in Aachen, Germany.
My FAS and IRC handle is `lorbus` and on GitHub and Twitter I'm
26 matches
Mail list logo