On 05/21/2012 01:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Technically, the major difference is git recording each and every
detail, which an rpm's user hardly is interested in. The latter audience
is not interested in seeing these details, they are interesting in
summaries.
E.g. they are not interested in
On 05/14/2012 03:02 PM, Tomas Radej wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if Packaging Guidelines could be amended so that even when creating
tarball from VCS, using a standalone shell script would be mandatory (see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control ). I
believe
On 03/15/2012 08:24 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Luke Macken does Bodhi. It certainly sounds non-trivial to me, for a
start, Bodhi uses FAS and Bugzilla does not.
It would be trivial if these decisions would be made by a human who is CCed
on both (i.e. the maintainer of the
On 02/29/2012 01:15 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Neal Beckerndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I think he's got a point
http://www.osnews.com/story/25659/Torvalds_requiring_root_password_for_mundane_things_is_quot_moronic_quot_
Yeah but last time we tried this in fedora it
Currently, on Fedora 16, service iptables save prints the following:
# service iptables save
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl save iptables.service
Unknown operation save
The service iptables save command is documented in a number of places
and has been recommended to users for years. See, for
On 02/15/2012 03:45 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
The service iptables save command is documented in a number of places
and has been recommended to users for years. See, for example, the
security guide:
On 02/16/2012 02:06 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/15/2012 11:09 PM, Emanuel Rietveld wrote:
I propose the following script in /etc/init.d/iptables
I propose you file a BUG against IPTABLES and put your proposal into
that bug report then wait and see what Thomas has to say.
JBG
On 02/01/2012 01:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
To-be-installed files obviously have no on-disk fingerprints, so it
wont work for initial installation. So yes, those fake compatibility
provides are needed. Strictly speaking, compatibility provides would
be needed for ALL the moved files, not
On 01/30/2012 03:38 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
You might not want to encourage the app model, but that boat already
left the dock. For Linux distros to be players on portables and
desktops, they need to recognize that there is an appetite among the
user base for app type programs that are
On 01/11/2012 12:43 PM, Richard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote:
Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here:
http://panopticlick.eff.org/
Maybe I am missing something, but isn't this only relevant if your IP is
not visible to the web server? Otherwise,
Hi.
I'm interested in helping out (comaintainer?), but I'm a little scared -
I don't know much about java yet, nor java packaging guidelines, or
whatever relevant guidelines, and I might need a little handholding.
Maybe you can give me something useful but not urgent that you need
done, that is
On 11/03/2011 07:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tom Callaway wrote:
I took a quick look at qtparted a few days ago, the problem is that
qtparted depended on functionality (move, copy, resize) in parted that
no longer exists in parted-3.0.
snip
Removing features like this, without providing any
first package for Fedora and I welcome any feedback.
Thank you for your time.
-Emanuel
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mo Morsi m...@morsi.org
Date: Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Rails 2 in F16
To: Emanuel Rietveld codehot...@gmail.com
Hey Emanuel, appreciate
13 matches
Mail list logo
