On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 8:58 PM Solomon Peachy via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 07:21:54PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Hi Matthew, you say: "We're missing people", and I think, "who?".
> > And who are you going to miss if you move to discourse?
>
> Again
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:02 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> I have a CentOS 9 Stream VM I'm trying to update and I'm getting a 503 on:
>
>
> https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-baseos-9-stream&arch=x86_64&protocol=https,http
>
> I'm posting here because the site seems to be Fedora hosted?
>
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:51 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
... snip ...
So if you haven't tried wayland and plasma lately - you should try again.
>
OK.
a) is there an easy (i.e. documented) way of testing it?
b) is there an equivalent to 'remoting' single windows (applications)
to remote machines
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:28 PM Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
>
> On project I used to follow quite a bit was the RT request tracker.
> They moved to discourse some time ago. The end result was that email
> became a mostly useless stream of context free messages and you
> basically have to open a
I'm not sure if this is the right list for the question, but...
I now have the time and opportunity to migrate my main dev machine
from Fedora 8 to something current, namely F21. But in the intervening
years, there have been lots of changes to KDE, and most of the visual
aspects don't suit my way
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> Erik Schilling wrote:
> > Over the time I just got used to hitting the special button...
>
> And that's what that "special button" is for. :-)
>
> If the touchpad has physical buttons (or physically-drawn "virtual
> buttons"), why do users ev
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Billy Crook
> wrote:
> > Sendmail or otherwise, an MTA BELONGS in Default.
>
> There is no consensus on that, at all. Very successful competitors to
> Fedora have removed it, and their users are happy.
>
I need some help/guidance on how to re-build a (normally) distributed
package (net-snmp) using the latest Fedora spec file, but using the
latest (upstream git head) version of the source; or alternatively,
the current Fedora version _with my_ fix applied.
You see, it may be some time before upstre
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
>>
>>> If so... why use chcon versus the semanage/restorecon technique?
>>> or if my assesement is w
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:
>> %{_bindir}/chcon -t httpd_sys_script_exec_t
>> /var/www/html/nia/scripts/* 2>/dev/null
>> semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t '/var/www/html/nia/tmp&
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
>
>> If so... why use chcon versus the semanage/restorecon technique?
>> or if my assesement is wrong... can someone point me to a better
>> explanation/tutorial?
...
I've reviewing my buildRPM spec file so that it works in newer distributions
(currently playing with RHEL 5.6), but my question is applicable to
Fedora xxx as well.
During the development of my package, I had encountered issues with my
build and install procedures during the slow migration/accepta
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:51 AM, seth vidal
> wrote:
> > I agree with one section of your argument:
> > arguments which are just "I'm not used to this" are bad arguments.
> >
> > Many of the arguments presented in this and other threads do
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:16 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > seth vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > > > > My suggestion is that you keep both init systems, SysV/LSB and
> systemd,
> > > > > as separate offerings out of many, and
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Jon Masters
> wrote:
> > Did anyone upstream look into a compatibility environment variable that
> > could be exported to change the direction of the memcpy? Yes, it's a
> > hack, but it would allow affected
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 01:37:41PM -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
>
> >But thats (unfortunately) exactly what I have to do because the device
> >isn't running Linux. :-(
>
> Yeah, this probably isn't
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:53:01AM -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
> >So I'm going to hijack this thread a little and ask if anyone can
> >point me to a resource that can tell me (at the lowest level) what
> >
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Jon Masters
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:34 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Jon Masters
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> > Well, the
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
... snip ...
> Well, the US law of the land says that you can't listen in on telephone
> communications frequencies either. And the CFR advice and FCC
> implementation is to require that designers of radio equipment make it
> intentionally dif
> Joachim Backes wrote:
> > having the following question: What does the DVD/CD media check exactly
> > if booting a Fedora DVD/CD? Is it the sha256sum? If yes, why this media
> > check, because it could be done after having burned the DVD?
> >
> > If not, is it possible to perform this media check
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
... snip ...
> Since 2006 we've slipped at least 16-18 weeks by my count. That's more
> than half of a full release cycle.
>
Actually, I don't think that the slips in the releases have _accumulated_ to
be
'half' of a full release cycle' beca
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Cleaver, Japheth wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of
> > Denis Leroy
> > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 8:34 AM
> > To: Development discussions rela
22 matches
Mail list logo
