What is the point of this? I am probably missing something obvious..
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 18:46 Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 11:39:34AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hey, I have noticed that anaconda-core has a runtime dependency on
> python3-coverage.
> >
> > Is it some
python-boto is dead and deprecated. Why do you want to take it?
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 03:43 Gwyn Ciesla via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I'll take python-goto. FAS: limb.
>
>
> Sent from ProtonMail mobile
>
>
>
> Original Message
> On Aug 10, 2019, 8:06 PM,
I've dropped beignet a while ago since I was getting bugs, but upstream is
dead. Also many times, POCL performed better than beignet.
And after all, if you want to do something complicated with OpenCL, you
already have high-end AMD or latest Intel card..
However, anyone is free to unretire it.
You need to explicitly set --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:F31
I thought itvwas fixed, but probably it does not work for repoquery.
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 23:07 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I've noticed that recently, I see this with repoquery regardless of the
> query:
>
> $ repoquery
I think it uses koji build repo. So same as epel buildroot does.
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 10:47 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> See for example:
>
>
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/python-mccabe?collection=epel7
> 2019-08-11
>
You meant more like "rebuilding" modules rather than branching, right?
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 3:09 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> There is a Mass Branching scheduled for next Tuesday, that is on Aug 13th
> 2019. There were some modules that are stuck in rawhide that shouldn't be
>
Well, it was retired because it did not built since F30 mass rebuild…
* petersen (Jens Petersen)
* ueno (Daiki Ueno)
* praiskup (Pavel Raiskup)
* suanand (Sundeep Anand)
* nphilipp (Nils Philippsen)
* jjanco (Jakub Janco)
6 maintainers could not fix FTBFS for half a year? Anybody is
interested
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:17 PM Jason Tibbitts wrote:
>
> I'm on vacation and a few days behind on email, sorry.
>
> > "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>
> ZJ> Also, there are still some obvious packages to trim:
>
> I wonder if the rpm dependency on curl (the executable, not the
This has been fixed almost a week ago..
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, 11:58 Adam Samalik wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 1:30 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 05:27:21PM +0200, Christian Glombek wrote:
>> > Whoop this is great!
>> > But I
How does it deal with rich dependencies? Does it take conflicts into the
account? What about multiple provides which satisfy dependency?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019, 19:41 Adam Samalik wrote:
> I wrote a script to visualise dependencies of RPM installations [1]. It
> supports file paths and container
Count me in! I'm not sure if I will have much time to do actual work,
but surely I can help people with advises :)
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 4:58 PM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> I'm starting a Minimization Objective [1] focusing on minimising the
> installation size of some of the
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-07-29)
=
Meeting started by ignatenkobrain at 15:00:03 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-07-29/fesco.2019-07-29-15.00.log.html
.
Hello,
I'm updating rust-crossbeam-channel from 0.3.8 to 0.3.9 which has
changed license a bit: `MIT or ASL 2.0` → `(MIT or ASL 2.0) and BSD`.
Other crossbeam crates will have this change as well when upstream
releases new version.
It seems that it should have been there for long time due to
on its own.
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 5:54 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 28. 07. 19 16:35, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm getting hundreds of ABRT bugs from tracker which I simply have no
> > time to go through. Would anybody like to take over that pac
Hello fellows,
So that now i686 is no longer exists (I mean as an image), is there
reason to produce i686 binaries for applications written in Rust? That
also would mean we would stop testing i686 as a platform for crates,
but I honestly love this because very often builds fail due to LLVM
OOM.
Hello,
It seems that package is unmaintained in upstream (last commit was
more than a year ago) and FTBFS with Python 3.8[0]. Nothing depends on
it in Fedora.
Let me know if you would like to take over the package. Otherwise I'll
orphan it next weekend.
[0]
Hello,
I'm getting hundreds of ABRT bugs from tracker which I simply have no
time to go through. Would anybody like to take over that package from
me?
I'll orphan it next weekend if nobody speaks up. Sorry for inconvenience.
___
devel mailing list --
Hello,
does anybody know how to contact Gaël Chamoulaud (gchamoul)?
* https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/facter/pull-request/4
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733765
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-07-29 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Hello,
we've got new section in Packaging Guidelines about verifying upstream
sources[0] with GPG. Please use it whenever possible :)
Thanks!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification
___
devel mailing
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:52 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "David Kašpar"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 5:23:22 PM
> > Subject: Self Introduction: Dee'Kej (looking for sponsor)
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > my name is David
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:07 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Stephen Gallagher:
>
> > With my FESCo hat on, I can't support this action as currently stated.
> > I think I'd be more inclined to consider it if the Change was proposed
> > as a new architecture bring-up. Effectively, this would be a
Happy to help!
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019, 08:13 Clement Verna wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Container SIG has been busy in the last few weeks working on
> getting the Fedora container base image smaller (It was growing over
> 300MB). While a few minor changes [0-1] have recently landed in the
>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 12:08 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > 1. Lower requirement to something like SSE4 and select other CPU
> > features which are available in most of CPUs for last decade.
>
> Sorry, but -1 to SSE4 too. One of my machines s
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:44 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
> Le mar. 23 juil. 2019 à 08:30, Igor Gnatenko
> a écrit :
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:31 AM Igor Gnatenko
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Florian,
> > >
> > > On Mon, J
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:31 AM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:28 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/x86-64_micro-architecture_update
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Fedora currently uses t
Hi Florian,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:28 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/x86-64_micro-architecture_update
>
> == Summary ==
> Fedora currently uses the original K8 micro-architecture (without
> 3DNow! and other AMD-specific parts) as the baseline for its
> x86_64
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-07-22)
=
Meeting started by ignatenkobrain at 15:00:27 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-07-22/fesco.2019-07-22-15.00.log.html
.
-3.1.2-2.fc31.src
- wcslib-devel >= 5.19
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 1:19 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Does it change SONAME?
>
> Easiest way would be to install `fedora-repos-rawhide` and run
> something like: `dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libwcs.so.5()(64bit)'
> --source -
Does it change SONAME?
Easiest way would be to install `fedora-repos-rawhide` and run
something like: `dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libwcs.so.5()(64bit)'
--source --exactdeps`
I see it also has python bindings, does it break API too?
___
devel mailing
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-07-22 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Because of systemd-libs… It is a dependency of util-linux at least.
That ships logger and lslogins utilities which link against
libsystemd.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 8:42 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> > We have a circular dependency in the minimal buildroot:
> >
> >
My bad, I wrongly counted votes for the first change. It should be +9,0,-0.
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2019-07-12)
===
Meeting started by ignatenkobrain at 15:00:05 UTC. The full logs are
available at
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-07-12 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 5:09 PM Jun Aruga wrote:
>
> There are 2 Ruby modules 2.5 and 2.6.
> Ruby 2.5 module has rubygem-bundler in it.
> How about keeping the rubygem-bundler as 1.X?
Guidelines say that if you want multiple versions, unversioned version
should be the latest. So rubygem-bundler
ted (=Bundled) with Bundler 1 will still need to use
> Bundler 1 or they need to upgrade manually to Bundler 2[0].
>
> Bundler 2 can dynamically select required runtime (v1 or v2) depending on the
> lock (=dependency) file.
>
> Regards,
> Pavel
>
> [0]
> https://bundle
Why do we want to keep old version around?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 20:12 Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bundler_2.0
>
> == Summary ==
> Upgrade to Bundler 2.0, the latest stable gem version.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:pvalena | Pavel Valena]], [[User:vondruch |
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:45 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:34 PM Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 13:22 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 7:49 PM Adam Williamson <
>>
Hi Guido,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:59 PM Guido Aulisi wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm going to update zita-convolver library to version 4 in the next
> weeks, it will be a rather slow job because of holidays :-)
>
> According to dnf this update will impact the packages listed below:
>
>
Hi Fabio,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:35 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019, 17:28 Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 at 14:15, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>> Stop
Hello,
I just noticed that more than 700 of Rust packages are broken due to
gawk update (4.2.1 → 5.0.0). This is… bad.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723359
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Hello,
I just wanted to give you an update from my last discussions on
#fedora-modularity and other places.
# Problems definition
* Default modules can't have conflicting dependenices
* Changing dependencies in a stream is not supported
# Why does libgit2 has to be a module?
libgit2 is not
Hello,
All applications written in Rust are shipped to stable releases via
modules which includes building all crates (libraries), applications
themselves and throwing away all crates (since those are linked
statically).
However, since we are using dynamic BuildRequires[0] as of yesterday
it is
Have you read the packaging guidelines how to properly set version for
pre-release?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_versioning_prereleases_with_tilde
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:08 AM Honggang LI wrote:
>
> I updated libfabric-1.8.0rc1 for fedora rawhide.
* Koji -- yes
* Mock -- yes
* COPR -- no idea
Koji and Mock are definitely only if you use rawhide chroot.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:41 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 18. 06. 19 3:27, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > as of today, builders have been
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:01 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> I disagree. I think we need gating to block as much stuff that breaks
> >> things from landing as we can and then we should find that keeping
> >> composes going is much
Hi folks,
as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and
DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide.
Change Page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
Example of real build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1286391
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:11 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On 6/14/19 2:52 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> > Le 13/06/2019 à 20:31, Adam Samalik a écrit :
> >> So, I'd like to discuss the libgit issue [1] [2] we're experiencing. With a
> >> help of a few people, I've put together this post to get us on
I did not intend to provide solution to the problem, just as an idea.
Or you think changing huge pieces of infrastructure, and working for
3+ years on a project (modularity) was done just to have 3 versions of
Node.js available?
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 4:36 PM Carl George wrote:
>
> > So what is
> Modules are fine for applications.
So what is the point of modules then? If we want just multiple
versions of a few applications, we can just have few repositories.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Hello Adam and everyone else,
I want to point out that there are 2 issues and not just one as
described in the article.
1) Default streams can't conflict
2) Switching dependencies on a module does not work
Both of the issues are solvable and should be handled by DNF, however
they are not. And I
Is there a typo somewhere? Your original message or your last message.
Original says that voting ends on 20 June while today is 11th and you
write that there are only two more days left.
What is the correct date?
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 6:53 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 8:03
So apparently new RPM segfaults on some architectures randomly, I'm
digging into it.
In worst case, I'll tag old version and try to debug it locally.
So far I can't reproduce it =(
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:36 PM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>
> As per
condition is provided by anything so this check is not useful for
packages with rich dependencies at all…
>
> Vít
>
>
>
> Dne 09. 06. 19 v 17:17 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've noticed that people keep pushing updates which have broken
> > depend
Hello,
I have been trying to write some script which would listen on
generation of new repository / successful build is tagged in Koji and
do some actions locally. Or basically whenever someone pushes commits,
I want to fetch repo locally.
I was reading
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 7:03 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2019, 18:06 Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've noticed that people keep pushing updates which have broken dependencies.
>>
>> For example, python-kombu was updated f
Hello,
I've noticed that people keep pushing updates which have broken dependencies.
For example, python-kombu was updated from 4.6.0 to 4.6.1. Both of
those versions have broken dependency "python3.7dist(amqp) >= 2.5.0 ".
However, it was built both for F30 and F31 and even submitted to
bodhi.
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 3:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 2:10 PM Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 12:54 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Le samedi 08 juin 2019 à 11
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 12:54 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le samedi 08 juin 2019 à 11:23 +0200, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Imagine situation that somebody is working on KDE rebase and me on
> > libgit2 rebase. Both involve rebuilding/updati
Hi,
Imagine situation that somebody is working on KDE rebase and me on
libgit2 rebase. Both involve rebuilding/updating some package, let's
say kf5-ktexteditor.
We both work in different side tags, in KDE rebase kf5-ktexteditor
gets updated to a new version. In libgit2 rebase, old version gets
Except that it doesn't scale with multiple people working with different
side tags.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019, 18:51 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 06. 19 17:57, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 18:27 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >&
We actually talked about this on oSC19 with Neal Gompa and Florian
Festi. And we'd need it for automation we are planning to work on...
Then I spoke to pingou and he told me that tags are easy to delete and
you need some special hook to prevent that...
I did not have time to look at it though.
Hi Ben,
there is some misconfiguration in elections app. For FESCo elections,
it is written "Here are the candidates for the 1 seat(s) open:" while
there are 4 seats.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:05 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Voting is now open for the Fedora 30 election cycle. You can vote in
> the
Hello,
I'm going to build libgit 0.28.x in rawhide and rebuild all affected
packages somewhere this week.
Just FYI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 9:36 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Le vendredi 31 mai 2019 à 02:15 +0200, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
> > On Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:38:25 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > Dne 29. 05. 19 v 23:52 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > > > If we
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:01 PM Daniel Mach wrote:
> Dne 30. 05. 19 v 8:39 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> > Last time I was about to propose this in F29, I did mass-rebuild myself
> > and while decompressing was faster in most of the cases, the size was
> > definitely worse.
I'll take this one.
On Thu, May 30, 2019, 12:46 Brian (bex) Exelbierd
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bug 1711303 - Review Request: pass-pwned - Password-Store extension
> for Have I Been Pwned
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711303
>
> is stuck. It got an awesome first pass on 19 May, but has
Last time I was about to propose this in F29, I did mass-rebuild myself and
while decompressing was faster in most of the cases, the size was
definitely worse. So definitely "Lower bandwidth on mirrors if we choose
the highest compression level" is under the question.
I think before approving
In meson we automatically set all "auto" features to be "enabled". So
people have to disable things they don't want manually.
On Thu, May 16, 2019, 10:00 Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
> > configure with feature autodetection is a PITA :/
>
> The PITA doesn't come from auto-detection, rather
It is up to you. If the plan is always to have master in sync with your
module stream, then you can keep master. If you want to retire sway from
rawhide at some point, you would need to move to the stream branch.
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:25 AM Till Hofmann
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently
Except that everyone is on RH Summit, so there won't be a meeting today.
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:54 PM Jun Aruga wrote:
> > The agenda for the meeting is available as flagged tickets [in the
> Modularity repository](
> https://pagure.io/modularity/issues?status=Open=Meeting).
>
> No agenda? I
Koji already picked up the change. COPR and local mock chroots (unless they
use F31 build repo, which they don't by default) have to wait for compose.
On Fri, May 3, 2019, 19:14 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 05. 19 18:41, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > https://f
anything (apart from making buildroot composition
faster and smaller size), but let us know if anything breaks :)
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
python-jenkins-job-builder is fixed.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:58 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hey!
>
> There are 2 Python related changes in Fedora 31 that unfortunately
> interact with
> each other.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8
>
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 8:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 04. 19 8:26, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > This is what wiki says:
> >
> > * |/usr/bin/gdb.minimal| — GDB executable built without optional
> unneeded features
> > * |/usr/bin/gdb-add-index| — Executable s
This is what wiki says:
- /usr/bin/gdb.minimal — GDB executable built without optional unneeded
features
- /usr/bin/gdb-add-index — Executable script shared with gdb-headless
package (modified to fallback to gdb.minimal if exists)
gdb-add-index is in both gdb-minimal and
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:04 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
> returns 4632 entries on my laptop.
>
> This
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 4:57 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> > that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
When I was filing mock's issue, I was still discussing how we can implement
this in GDB. This particular change does not require any mock / config
changes. gdb-minimal will not conflict with gdb..
Although that mock feature is useful on its own if we ever decide to
replace libcurl with
Count me in! :)
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:09 PM Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm very interested in AV1, the new royalty-free video codec developed by
> Xiph, Google and others (https://aomedia.org/).
>
> I have packaged almost all project related to AV1:
> - aom:
Why?
What is the problem with packages having branch "latest", "1.x" and such?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:35 PM Jun Aruga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more.
>
> Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the
> package
You can do something like:
rpms:
foo-bootstrap:
name: foo
bar:
buildafter:
- foo-bootstrap
foo:
buildafter:
- bar
However, MBS doesn't support that yet.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 1:35 AM Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Golang, we have a lot of cyclic
At this moment,
* %meson doesn't pass -Db_ndebug at all, we use project-specific options
* If project doesn't specify it, b_ndebug=false is default in meson
* In case of mesa, it specifies b_ndebug=if-release which works correctly
now with backported patch
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:29 PM Kalev
-d229ead72a
* https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-9f6eea54fe
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:59 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On 4/8/19 11:13, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Peter Hutterer:
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:20:35AM +0200, Igor
Hello,
While fixing mesa build which was slow due to a lot off debug stuff
(assert()), I've added -Db_ndebug=true into the %meson macro.
This seemed like good approach because in Fedora we should not use debug
bits in runtime (not related to debuginfo). However this caused some
breakage in some
Michal, can you do it for all packages with ecosystem crates.io?
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:04 PM Michal Konecny wrote:
> I refreshed every project on the list (deleted latest version that will
> be retrieved again in next check, which is done every hour). You should
> already see new bugs in
Hello,
I'm building modules with Rust apps (because this is only way to get them
in f28/f29/f30) and I noticed that building them takes ages (more
specifically, more than 12 hours(!)). I can build all those packages on my
laptop under 1 hour. Even composes take less time.
It seems that MBS has
Hello folks,
I've prepared PR for new version of minetest:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/minetest/pull-request/3
I'll merge it later this week and build for F30 and F31. It also involves
License change but it was just incorrect even before.
I'll also probably make a module out of it so it
I think those messages are just informational, because nothing uses those
modules to build packages.. or am I wrong?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 14:32 Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> From:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680320#c2
>
> When you try to run:
> mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Enjoy plain makefiles :)
The problem here is that custom build recipes do not set SONAME.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 7:47 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've pushed what looked like a harmless update from libgif-5.1.4 to
> libgif-5.1.6 to rawhide/f30, but apparently the dependency generator
>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 4:26 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2019-02-18, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Let's take graphene as an example.
> >
> > Spec file contains:
> >
> > %package devel
> > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> > %package tests
> > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
I've updated wiki page with what Neal said.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:11 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>
> On 19. 02. 19 2:26, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:31 PM Tom Stellard
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Would there be some way to opt out of this? In some cases,
> %{name}-devel
> >>
Bash 5.0 is now in Rawhide/F30. Enjoy :)
P.S. Don't hesitate to report bugs if you find one (or two).
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
and
> FESCo teams.
>
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveExcessiveLinking
>
>
> Owner(s):
> * Igor Gnatenko
> * Neal Gompa
>
>
> Pass "--as-needed" flag the linker through
We have just merged side tag (f30-readline8) into the f30 which includes
readline 8 + packages which needed rebuild against new readline (due to
SONAME bump).
Whatever was failing before and fails now… It just failed.
Whatever was not failing before and fails now… Fails not due to readline
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 11:32 PM Jerry James wrote:
> Was the apparently in-progress readline 8.0 rebase announced
> somewhere? All I can recall seeing is [1], which said, 3.5 weeks ago,
> that the rebase would happen "in a couple of weeks". But apparently
> there is a side tag and builds are
Bash 5.0 is now in Rawhide/F30. Enjoy :)
P.S. Don't hesitate to report bugs if you find one (or two).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 9:36 PM Eli Young wrote:
> > I'd still consider this on case by case basis instead of developing a
> general
> > solution, sometimes a simple Recommends works. Sometimes, it's more
> complicated.
>
> That's fair and makes a lot of sense. I do like the pattern mentioned by
It won't help because you didn't take the build dependencies of ant/maven…
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:51 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:16 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:08 PM Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 12. 02. 19 11:46, Fabio
Not in the buildroot. Default modules are available by default only for
users and not in the buildroot.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:01 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 12/02/2019 07:22, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:19 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >> I'm curious: What happens
101 - 200 of 908 matches
Mail list logo
