On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 21:08 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 10:41 AM, James Laska wrote:
> >* Fedora 18
> >* mediawiki-validator -
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5086055
> >
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 21:08 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 10:41 AM, James Laska wrote:
> >* Fedora 18
> >* mediawiki-validator -
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5086055
> >
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 15:23 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > I was not able to use your updated package as the latest version of
> > semantics now requires the Validator[1] extension.
> >
> > [1] http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Validator
>
> More specifically:
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 10:05 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The mediawiki package has been updated to 1.20.2 for Rawhide and 1.19.3
> for F17/F18.
>
> The mediawiki-math/nopath packages have been merged into just
> "mediawiki" (with Obsoletes). There is one package that depended on th
Greetings gang,
I'm happy to rebuild as needed, just ran out of time this week. I'll give it a
shot and report back.
Thanks,
James
On Mar 1, 2013, at 6:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 10:05 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The mediawiki package has been
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 11:34 -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:11:17AM -0500, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm in the process of updating the existing mediawiki-semantic package.
> > The new version of mediawiki-semantic ad
Greetings,
I'm in the process of updating the existing mediawiki-semantic package.
The new version of mediawiki-semantic adds a dependency on an unpackaged
extension: Validator. Anyone interested in a review swap?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784008
Thanks,
James
signature.asc
Greetings,
I have two packages proposed for review. Both are fairly small sized
python libraries. These packages are dependencies of autotest (which
should resurface for review soon-ish).
python-signalfd - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732737
python-atfork - https://bugzilla.red
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-08-05/f16-blocker-review.2011-08-05-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-08-05/f16-blocker-review.2011-08-05-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-08-05
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2011-08-05
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Mark your calendars ... the fourth Alpha blocker review meeting starts
at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers this Friday. We'll review p
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-29/f16-alpha-blocker-review.2011-07-29-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-29/f16-alpha-blocker-review.2011-07-29-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:54:24PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > newRepo seems to fail, although it's not clear why.
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3230556
> >
> > Maybe something to do with bra
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f1
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2011-07-22
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
!!! ALL-CAPS RED-ALERT OMG LOL !!!
Fedora 16 Alpha test compose is less than *one* week away (Jul 26) and
F16 Alpha isn't far behind
#fedora-bugzappers: F16-Alpha Blocker Review
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-15/f16-alpha-blocker.2011-07-15-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraprojec
- Original Message -
> # F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #1
> # Date: 2011-07-15
> # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
> # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Just a reminder that the first Fedora 16 Alpha blocker bug review meeting
starts in under 1 hour
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2011-07-15
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Hard to believe, but the "vacation" is over. Fedora 16 Alpha test
compose is a few weeks away (Jul 26) and the Alpha is about a month
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 22:24 -0600, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 11:49 AM, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> > On 05/12/2011 09:01 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> >> On 05/12/2011 12:20 AM, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> >>> I'm seeing the following after trying to update an fc14.x86_6
# F15 Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2011-05-06
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The *last* scheduled F15 Final blocker review meeting will be this
Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll review proposed and
acc
=
#fedora-bugzappers: F15 blocker review #3
=
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-29/f15-blocker-review.2011-04-29-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugz
# F15 Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2011-04-29
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The third (of four) F15 Final blocker review meetings will be this
Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll review proposed and
acc
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 21:03 +0200, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> On 27.04.2011 15:38, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >>
> >> - Post only errors It is common, for example, in automated build or
> >> continuous integration systems to send out emails only on errors.
> >> Similar goes for Unix tools, which tend to be
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-21/f15-blocker-review.2011-04-21-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-21/f15-blocker-review.2011-04-21-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-21/f1
# F15 Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2011-04-21
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Due to upcoming holidays, the second F15 Final blocker review meeting
will be this Thursday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll revie
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:30:44 +0300, AT wrote:
>
> > > AutoQA is still in testing phase, there is no enforcement yet.
> >
> > Maybe the bodhi messages confused me. When I logon to a.f.o/updates it
> > prominently displays:
> >
> >
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-15/f-15-blocker-review.2011-04-15-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-15/f-15-blocker-review.2011-04-15-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-b
# F15 Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2011-04-14
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Mark your calendars, the first F15 Final blocker review meeting will be
this Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll review propos
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-08/f-15-beta-blocker-review.2011-04-08-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-08/f-15-beta-blocker-review.2011-04-08-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2
# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2011-04-08
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Mark your calendars, the fifth (and hopefully last) Beta blocker review
meeting will be this Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers.
# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2011-03-25
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Greetings,
This Friday is April 1st. I was trying to cook up something clever for
the blocker meeting, without causing too much heart
# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2011-03-25
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Greetings!
The third Beta blocker review meeting will be this Friday at 17:00 UTC
in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll spend time reviewing p
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 19:54 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:30:53PM -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > On 03/21/2011 12:26 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 18:49 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >> How can I add
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 12:30 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 03/21/2011 12:26 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 18:49 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> How can I add tests for my package to Fedora AutoQA, eg. so that they
> >> run (say) each time
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 18:49 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> How can I add tests for my package to Fedora AutoQA, eg. so that they
> run (say) each time I build the package in Koji?
>
> (Note: I'm not asking how to run an AutoQA server myself.)
Hey Richard,
We also aren't yet setup to provide
==
#fedora-bugzappers: F-15-Beta Blocker Review#2
==
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-03-18/f-15-beta-blocker.2011-03-18-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.o
# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2011-03-18
# Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Greetings folks!
The second Beta blocker review meetings start this Friday at 17:00 UTC
in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll spend time reviewing
#fedora-bugzappers: F-15-Beta blocker review
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-03-11/f-15-beta-blocker-review.2011-03-11-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.
# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2011-03-11
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Greetings folks!
What use is an Alpha, if we didn't follow it up with a Beta?
The Beta blocker review meetings start this Friday at high-noon (EST) in
===
#fedora-bugzappers: F15Alpha Blocker Review
===
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-02-18/f15-alpha-bug-review.2011-02-18-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fe
# F15-Alpha Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2011-02-18
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The F-15-Alpha release candidate is scheduled for compose later today
(Thu 2011-02-17). The compose cannot start until all accepted blocker
bugs have b
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 11:28 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 02/15/2011 10:40 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> > On 2011/02/15 08:36 (GMT-0500) James Laska composed:
> >
> >> Good-bye install.img, hello initrd.img!
> >
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaco
Just a reminder ... the FreeIPA v2 test day is going on right now. Come
join the fun in #fedora-test-day.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-02-15_FreeIPAv2
Thanks,
James
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 10:31 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings folks,
>
> I'm passing along a
Greetings folks,
I'm passing along an announcement from the freeipa-users mailing list
[1] regarding the first of two Test Days next week. On Tuesday, we'll
be hosting a test day focused on FreeIPA v2.
The FreeIPA project implements an identity server. IPA stands for
Identity, Policy and Audit (
=
#fedora-bugzappers: F-15-Alpha Blocker Bug Review
=
Meeting started by jlaska at 17:00:20 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-02-11/f15alpha-bu
# F15-Alpha Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2011-02-11
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) [1]
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release of Fedora
15. We'll be discussing all of these to determine if they meet the
Alpha r
Greetings,
In case you were planning on attending tomorrow's Test Day, the FreeIPA
v2 [1] previously scheduled for Thursday, February 10 (tomorrow) has
been rescheduled. Several issues and bugs have slowed the preparation.
Those issues should be resolved shortly.
The FreeIPA v2 Test Day will now
Greetings,
On January 27, 2011, Fedora QA hosted a biosdevname Test Day [1].
Thanks to all who participated on wiki+irc, and kudos to Narendra for
organizing the event. I'm including some feedback from Narendra in this
recap.
HIGHLIGHTS
=
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 06:
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 16:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > We can easily test for rpath,
>
> But who does it on all packages regularly? AutoQA is still vaporware.
Because you haven't taken the time to familiarize yourself with a
project doesn't make it vaporware. AutoQA [1] w
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:57 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 10:52 -0500, James Laska wrote:
>
> > Agreed ... I think it makes sense to keep Category:Test_Cases as just a
> > container for sub-categories if possible. Mainly for the reasons you
> >
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 14:35 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:11 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, everyone. So, in the recent debate about the update process it again
> > became clear that we were lacking a good process for providing
> > package-specific test instruction
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 17:29 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 18:12 -0500, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > the first isn't particularly specific to this, but it was a prerequisite
> > > that I discovered was missing: it's a guide to test case cre
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 15:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:11:15 +
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Hi, everyone. So, in the recent debate about the update process it
> > again became clear that we were lacking a good process for providing
> > package-specific test instructi
Thanks Adam for getting the ball rolling on this topic.
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:11 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So, in the recent debate about the update process it again
> became clear that we were lacking a good process for providing
> package-specific test instructions, and p
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:51 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> 3) Reporting to bugzilla is a mistake.
Not discounting the idea, but just looking for more detail. What
alternatives would you want to see? More kerneloops-like aggregate data
collection, or something else?
Thanks,
James
signature.asc
D
===
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 14 Final Blocker Review http://bit.ly/aBqOcu
===
Meeting started by poelcat at 16:01:15 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http:/
#fedora-bugzappers: F-14-Final Blocker Review Meeting -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=F14Blocker&hide_resolved=1
=
==
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 14 Final Blocker Review
==
Meeting started by poelcat at 16:00:21 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-10-15/fedora-
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 17:01 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> James Laska (jla...@redhat.com) said:
> > > No, this is well before the tree gets to that state. It would need to
> > > be implemented as a check on git push.
> >
> > We attempt to validate comps in thi
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:54 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> James Laska (jla...@redhat.com) said:
> > > 1) When you added this to F14/F15/EL6, you added a typo; this
> > > broke the F-14 branched compose and the EPEL updates push.
> > > *Please* verify your changes
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 15:42 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 1) When you added this to F14/F15/EL6, you added a typo; this
> broke the F-14 branched compose and the EPEL updates push.
> *Please* verify your changes before pushing.
How did the compose break? Is this something that the autoqa
rats_
Greetings folks,
I'd like to draw attention to the QA retrospective wiki page for Fedora
14.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_QA_Retrospective
As we did for Fedora 13 [1], I'd like to document any
gotchas/hiccups/awesome issues as they happen during a release. I don't
know about you, bu
Greetings testers!
The bugs listed below are Fedora 14 Blocker bugs that are believed to be
fixed. Help is needed to ensure Fedora 14 ships on time! You can
follow the list of ON_QA bugs at http://bit.ly/bLdmof
To get started, for each bug ...
1. Confirm reported bug is fixed, then change
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:16 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said:
> > That is certainly a big part of the problem. Anaconda does a _ton_ of
> > crap that only very few users care about. And keeping all these minority
> > features from falling apart is leaving y
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 12:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > Would it be overkill to put more explicit testing sign-off around NTH
> > > bugs?
> >
> > I don't see why not. I think this
=
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 14 Blocker Bug Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=538277&hide_resolved=1
===
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:33 -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
> All,
>
> I shall be working on some web frontends for ResultsDB, and I have
> been told that y'all already have some mock-ups/ideas for such a
> beast. If so, could y'all point me in the right direction.
I think this was intended for autoq
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:12 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> Adam Williamson said the following on 10/07/2010 01:24 PM Pacific Time:
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft
> >>> is a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process
> >>> m
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:58 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Adam Williamson said the following on 10/06/2010 01:32 PM Pacific Time:
> > > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the
==
#fedora-bugzappers: F14 Blocker Bug Review
==
Meeting started by jlaska at 16:00:07 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-10-01/f-14-blocker-review.2010-10-01-1
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 12:36 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Again, you're extrapolating way too far from a single problem case. The
> > problem is simply that we have the xorg-x11-drivers metapackage which
> > requires every single X driver and is in the critpath. There's va
Greetings,
This is great data, thanks for sharing Orion! I've cc'd the test@ list
as well since I think this is of value there.
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:10 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug
> report at bugzilla.redhat.co
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly
> have been hit by:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091
>
> which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD
> and a lot o
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
> tracking system during the F14 Beta process, and it seemed to go well.
> In a quick burst of airport productivity, I've quickly written up a
> bunch of proposed new wiki p
Greetings folks,
This has been announced in several other forums already, but we missed
test-annou...@l.fp.org. See below for additional details and
information on how to participate.
Hope to see you in #fedora-test-day!
Thanks,
James
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:35 -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 09:32 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> The Fedora 14 Beta RC compose is scheduled for tomorrow.
>
> ALL open bugs on Fedora 14 Blocker list (http://bit.ly/cZKo9K) MUST
> BE
> FIXED TODAY or we risk delaying the release. In other words we are
> very
> short on time to address
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:01 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * #461 F14 blessing for systemd (nirik, 20:12:29)
> * LINK:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_basic
> and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_tools
> (nirik, 20:38:06)
> * ACTION: : wi
#fedora-bugzappers: F-14-Beta blocker review
Meeting started by jlaska at 16:00:10 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-08-27/f-14-beta-blocker-review.2
> When: Friday, 2010-08-27 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST)
> Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Right of the coat tails of Fedora 14 Alpha, it's time for another
installment of the blocker bug review meeting! Friday kicks
off the first of several Beta bug review meetings.
If you are the owne
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:57 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 08/06/2010 10:16 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > 620211 :: NEW :: python-psyco :: kon...@tylerc.org :: python-psyco needs
> > porting to python 2.7 in F14 and devel ::
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 20:35 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Meeting at our regular time and location!
>
> When: 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)
> Where: irc.freenode.net #fedora-bugzappers
>
> Please join us. Here are the bugs we'll look at and discuss:
>
> 621102 :: NEW :: udev :: Harald Hoyer ::
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 13:08 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 08/05/2010 12:59 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> > 597858 [NEW - high - dwa...@redhat.com - --- -] "SELinux is preventing
> > firefox from making its memory writable and executable." crashes rawhide
> > firefox start
>
> The update to
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 16:27 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that Gnome 3 will be released in march 2011. How will this
> affect Fedora 14? Gnome 3 was an important feature of F14.
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/397482/
I believe it will continued to be offered as an experimental
I am sending this on behalf of Dave Lawrence and the bugzilla team at
Red Hat. Please forward this on to any appropriate lists that were
missed.
> Greetings,
>
> The Red Hat Bugzilla team is happy to announce the first public beta
> release of the next version of Red Hat Bugzilla based on the
>
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:03 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/7/10 1:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > I can think of one quick and simple way of doing this.
> >
> > When we review a bug and accept it on the blocker list, we use a keyword
> > of
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
> > Test Plan" testing this Thursday (2010-07-08).
> >
> > We've run out of time and run way to implement
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 15:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 15:30 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> > meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> > irc.freenode.net.
> >
> > = Followups =
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 06/02/2010 01:49 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 06/01/2010 10:43 PM, James Laska wrote:
> >>> Greetings package maintainers,
> >>
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 10:43 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings package maintainers,
> >
> > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
> > packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1],
>
&g
Greetings package maintainers,
Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1], rpmguard [2] and, if
applicable, initscript [3] tests. Good news, you can now opt-in to
receive test results by mail!
All you have to do is:
1. L
==
#fedora-meeting: F-13-Final Go / No Go
==
Meeting started by jlaska at 23:58:40 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-18/f-13-final-eng-readiness.2010-05-18-23.58.log.h
# F-13-Final Go/No-Go meeting
# Date: 2010-05-19 @ 00:00 UTC [1]
# Date: 2010-05-18 @ 20:00 EDT, 17:00 PDT
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
"Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering
Apologies ... I should have started out with a "Thank you" for
initiating this thread and sharing your ideas.
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 10:37 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:54 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> >
> > I like the idea of having multiple fl
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 20:23 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> So, I know a lot of you out there hate bugzilla flags, but I think we
> have problem with the current way we manage release blocker issues, and
> flags offer a potential solution.
>
> First the problem:
>
> Right now, anybody can propose
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 15:41 -0300, Clovis Tristao wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Em 12-05-2010 14:37, Frank Murphy escreveu:
> > On 12/05/10 18:31, Clovis Tristao wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I want to upgrade to Fedora F12->F13 but the first time I tried I had
> >> this error:
> >>
> >> Not enou
=
#fedora-meeting: F-13-Final readiness meeting
=
Meeting started by jlaska at 00:00:49 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-12/f-13-readiness.2010-05-12-
Greetings folks,
Just a quick update on the status of F13Blocker. According to the
schedule [1], Fedora 13 is scheduled to enter the release candidate
phase *today*, May 6, 2010. In order to enter this phase, all OPEN
F13Blocker bugs must be in MODIFIED or ON_QA.
The numbers are certainly movin
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 22:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:21 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings folks,
> >
> > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 13 is scheduled to enter the
> > release candidate phase this Thursday, May 4, 2010. In or
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:21 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings folks,
>
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 13 is scheduled to enter the
> release candidate phase this Thursday, May 4, 2010.
Please note, this Thursday is May 6, 2010.
Thanks,
James
signature.asc
Descriptio
Greetings folks,
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 13 is scheduled to enter the
release candidate phase this Thursday, May 4, 2010. In order to enter
this phase, all OPEN F13Blocker bugs must be in MODIFIED or ON_QA.
At the time of this mail, there are 10 issues remaining. The list of
NEW +
Greetings
Dan Williams posted updated NetworkManager packages for testing. These
packages are intended for both Fedora 13 and Fedora 12. The update is
available in updates-testing, and requires bodhi karma in order to make
Fedora 13.
Brave testers, please take a few minutes to install the app
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
