Re: LibreOffice packages

Michael Catanzaro píše v St 07. 06. 2023 v 08:15 -0500: > > Ideally all bundled dependencies should be hooked up to some sort of > automation that notices when there are upstream updates available, > comparable to upstream release monitoring. On Flathub this is done by >

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

Vít Ondruch píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 15:37 +0100: > > Dne 26. 01. 23 v 14:55 Jiri Eischmann napsal(a): > > Robert Marcano via devel píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 09:00 -0400: > > > On 1/26/23 8:42 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > > > Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

Robert Marcano via devel píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 09:00 -0400: > On 1/26/23 8:42 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100: > > > > > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:5

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

Neal Gompa píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 07:51 -0500: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:43 AM Jiri Eischmann > wrote: > > > > Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100: > > > > > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > > >

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100: > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch > > wrote: > > > I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this > > > particular case, > > > but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

vvs vvs píše v Po 09. 09. 2019 v 15:44 +: > I'm happy with any support no matter how it is defined. In fact I > didn't get very much support from Fedora either over more than 20 > years, so my expectations are quite low. You seem to have a rather narrow view of support. It's not just someone

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

Adam Williamson píše v Út 27. 08. 2019 v 16:01 -0700: > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 15:06 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > mcatanz...@gnome.org píše v Út 27. 08. 2019 v 15:07 +0300: > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:22 AM, John Harris < > > > joh...@splentity.com> > &g

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

Iñaki Ucar píše v Út 27. 08. 2019 v 16:17 +0200: > On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 14:20, wrote: > > The main competitor of Fedora Workstation is Ubuntu. Ubuntu ships > > without a firewall enabled and nobody considers this a critical > > vulnerability. Now: why is that...? > > 1. Ubuntu Server ships

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

IMHO surprisingly many. Just in my family there may be as many as 10 of them. They just never go to the Fedora mailing lists to represent themselves. And when you have a range of users from newbies to experts, you don't really design desktop software the way only the experts can deal with. Jiri

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

mcatanz...@gnome.org píše v Út 27. 08. 2019 v 15:07 +0300: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:22 AM, John Harris > wrote: > > No, that is not how this works, at all. First, let's go ahead and > > address the > > idea that "if the firewall blocks it, the app breaks, so it's the > > firewall's > >

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Simply reclaim disk space in Anaconda

Kamil Paral píše v St 24. 07. 2019 v 13:37 +0200: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:44 PM Ben Cotton > wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Anaconda_Reclaim_Disk_Space > > > > The Manual Partitioning screen supports all actions of the Resize > > Disk > > Space dialog, so it doesn't make

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

mcatanz...@gnome.org píše v Čt 15. 11. 2018 v 19:00 -0600: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > But there are some good cases for a longer lifecycle. For one > > thing, > > this has been a really big blocker for getting Fedora shipped on > > hardware. Second, there are

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

Neal Gompa píše v St 14. 11. 2018 v 07:54 -0500: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:49 AM Kalev Lember > wrote: > > On 11/14/2018 11:35 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > If Fedora had longer life cycles, and more streams maintained in > > > parallel, then I think the result would be that I end up

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

Gerald Henriksen píše v Čt 15. 11. 2018 v 10:22 -0500: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:38:12 +0100, you wrote: > > > I understand this argument, but I think more and more desktop users > > are being trained that updates happen on a schedule they didn't > > choose > > and are hard to avoid. This is how

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

Matthew Miller píše v Út 13. 11. 2018 v 18:36 -0500: > Hi everyone! Let's talk about something new and exciting. Since its > first release fifteen years ago, Fedora has had a 13-month lifecycle > (give or take). That works awesomely for many cases (like, hey, we're > all here), but not for

Re: Unretire recordmydesktop

Samuel Sieb píše v Po 05. 11. 2018 v 17:07 -0800: > On 11/5/18 12:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2018-11-04 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > I don't know about the other bugs, but not working on Wayland > > > can't be > > > held against it. Nothing works to record the desktop

Re: CVE-2018-14665 : Xorg X Server Vulnerabilities

Chris Adams píše v Čt 01. 11. 2018 v 09:53 -0500: > Once upon a time, Cătălin George Feștilă > said: > > Thank you! > > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 4:38 PM Reindl Harald < > > h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Am 01.11.18 um 15:33 schrieb Cătălin George Feștilă: > > > >

Re: Fedora Media Writer for macOS, is not signed?

Chris Murphy píše v Pá 11. 05. 2018 v 16:42 -0600: > Hi, > > The Fedora Media Writer for macOS at getfedora.org is not signed. I > filed this bug a couple weeks ago but somehow lost track of it, and > also it's possibly not the right location for the bug report as it > relates to what's offered

Re: Is Pagure slow for you too?

Kevin Fenzi píše v St 29. 03. 2017 v 13:01 -0600: > On 03/27/2017 11:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > It never used to be like that, it's probably just load as more and > > more > > stuff is moved to it. > > yeah. Note that I mentioned upthread that we had been working on > performance

Re: Is Pagure slow for you too?

Michael Catanzaro píše v Po 27. 03. 2017 v 08:17 -0500: > On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 11:14 +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > Hi, > > I wonder if it's just me or others also have problems with > > performance > > of Pagure. Pagure is always slower for me than e.g. Github

Is Pagure slow for you too?

Hi, I wonder if it's just me or others also have problems with performance of Pagure. Pagure is always slower for me than e.g. Github, but it's bearable. However, there are times when I have to wait easily 30-60 sec to load a page which makes Pagure almost impossible to work with. Jiri

Re: Firefox 52.0.1: CVE-2017-5428

Pavel Valena píše v St 22. 03. 2017 v 04:36 -0400: > - Original Message - > > From: "Greg Evenden" > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 3:26:48 AM > > Subject: Re: Firefox 52.0.1: CVE-2017-5428 > > > > > Does anyone know

Re: Firefox 52.0.1: CVE-2017-5428

Greg Evenden píše v St 22. 03. 2017 v 02:26 +: > might as well use Google-Chrome , Least one doesnt have to WAIT a > year or so for a Update to a security Bug thats pretty serious, an ya > wonder why more users use UBUNTU  Sure, someone who can't wait a couple of days for a fix (I'm not

Re: Nautilus usability

Michael Schwendt píše v Ne 27. 11. 2016 v 00:53 +0100: > This is about F25 and F24, but likely applies to older releases, too, > since I haven't noticed any improvements about it. > > Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then > started a similar task for other

Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

Michael Catanzaro píše v St 22. 06. 2016 v 10:22 -0500: > On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 15:43 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Eric, > > > > So how about similar article about Flatpack? I'd be interested to > > see > > the comparison between these two ... > > > > > > Vít > > FWIW, I saw some blog last

Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

Alexander Larsson píše v Čt 16. 06. 2016 v 21:11 +0200: > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 14:24 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Matthew Miller > ct.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 01:12:07PM -0400, Ben Rosser wrote: > > > > ship pip, npm, etc?

Re: Self Introduction: Tomas Orsava

Tomas Orsava píše v Út 16. 02. 2016 v 15:35 +: > Hi, I'm a new Red Hatter working in python-maintenance. > > I have submitted my first review-request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com > /show_bug.cgi?id=1308956 > It is the last missing dependency for a keyboard-driven, vim-like > browser called

Re: F24 System Wide Change: LiveUserCreator as Primary Downloadable

Josh Boyer píše v St 27. 01. 2016 v 08:43 -0500: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Martin Bříza > wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:35:56 +0100, Josh Boyer > ct.org> > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Jan Kurik > >

Any Alpine and Claws Mail users here?

Hi, I'm writing an article on 6 most popular email clients in Fedora for Fedora Magazine. For each client I'd like to have a quote from a Fedora contributor why he/she is using that particular client. I'm missing representatives of Alpine and Claws Mail. If you happen to use them, can you please

Re: Appdata files template for Fedora Workstation

Mattia Verga píše v Ne 17. 01. 2016 v 20:51 +0100: > Il 17/01/2016 18:58, Richard Hughes ha scritto: > > Are you using non-breaking UTF-8 spaces perhaps? Have a look in > > vim  > > and see if it has lots of control chars showing. At the moment > > even  > > xmllint won't validate it. Richard.  >

Let's write metadata about add-ons

Hi, due to previous efforts we have a pretty good appdata coverage of apps themselves, but add-ons (plugins, extensions,...) lag far behind. There are dozens of useful GUI app add-ons in Fedora repositories which don't have metadata files and are not exposed to users in GNOME Software. Let's

Re: Let's write metadata about add-ons

- Original Message - > From: "jens" <fed...@jenslody.de> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 11:47:47 AM > Subject: Re: Let's write metadata about add-ons &

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

Paul Wouters píše v St 09. 12. 2015 v 13:37 -0500: > On 12/09/2015 01:04 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:48:55AM +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote: > > > On 04.12.2015 15:57, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > How do other popular desktop/consumer OSes deal with this? > > > > Windows,

Re: REMINDER: FESCo, Council, FAmSCo elections

Chris Murphy píše v Pá 11. 12. 2015 v 11:11 -0700: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > > Hello everyone! > > > > I just want to remind you about the running Elections for FESCo, > > Council, FAmSCo. The voting period in now open and you can vote for > > your

Re: Is it time to allow Chromium in Fedora?

Gerald B. Cox píše v Út 11. 08. 2015 v 11:25 -0700: There has been a lively discussion within KDE regarding the Konqueror browser; and subsequently it has been decided that a non-KDE, GTK browser will be the default for the spin. Why, because Firefox is the only choice for Fedora,

Re: RFC: LiveUSB Creator Revamped

Michael Catanzaro píše v Čt 28. 05. 2015 v 07:55 -0500: On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:31 +0200, Martin Bříza wrote: Also, to see it without actually installing it, there's just a little bit outdated screencap: https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-6.ogv That looks quite good! I

Re: Rapid release for security updates

Reindl Harald píše v Út 19. 05. 2015 v 10:45 +0200: Am 19.05.2015 um 10:38 schrieb Martin Stransky: Hi guys, is there any mechanism how to speed up release of critical security fixes by Fedora update system? For instance Firefox packages are released *week* after official

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Gnome Shell - New Notifications

Jaroslav Reznik píše v St 14. 01. 2015 v 13:00 +0100: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Gnome Shell - New Notifications = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnomeShell_NewNotifications Change owner(s): Florian Müllner fmuel...@redhat.com Redesign the way in which notifications are

Invitation to DevConf.cz 2015

Hi, let me invite you to DevConf.cz 2015 [1] which will take place in Brno, Czech Republic on Feb 6-8. The third day of the conference will again be Fedora Day with a lot of Fedora-focused talks and discussions (and also with a lot of Fedora contributors around). You can find the list of

Re: Enable tapping by default

Peter Hutterer píše v Út 18. 11. 2014 v 14:55 +1000: On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:16:26AM +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: On 11/18/2014 12:12 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:27:53PM +0300, Mustafa Muhammad wrote: Hi, I am testing Fedora 21 beta and -like all previous

Re: Enable tapping by default

Mustafa Muhammad píše v Po 17. 11. 2014 v 14:27 +0300: Hi, I am testing Fedora 21 beta and -like all previous versions- click by tapping is off by default. Several bug reports concerning this were closed as NOTABUG, but tapping is useful for us (people who use it), I don't think it bothers

Re: Join to Mozilla Location Service in Fedora

Sudhir Khanger píše v Čt 06. 11. 2014 v 19:33 +0530: On Thursday, November 06, 2014 01:16:20 PM Martin Stransky wrote: I'd like to ask you to join the project, install the Mozilla Stumbler application [3] and help to improve the location accuracy. How do I benefit from broadcasting my

EMEA sponsorship program for Flock

Hi, the EMEA regional community decided yesterday to organize a small sponsorship program for EMEA contributors who would like to attend Flock 2014 that is going to take place in Prague on Aug 6-9 and haven't received (and will not receive) any sponsorship as speakers. The overall amount of money

Re: Slipping F21 (was: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-06-11))

Kalev Lember píše v St 11. 06. 2014 v 16:56 +0200: On 06/11/2014 04:37 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I forgot to open a ticket over the last week, but the Server WG has identified that completion of its core task (the Server Role API) is likely to need a little extra time. This is a blocker

Re: Slipping F21

Reindl Harald píše v St 11. 06. 2014 v 17:44 +0200: Am 11.06.2014 17:41, schrieb Jiri Eischmann: +1, we've already skipped one release and we just can't delay significantly more. Fedora is known as a fast-moving distribution. A large portion of our user base is using Fedora just

Re: Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core?

Miroslav Suchý píše v Čt 24. 04. 2014 v 11:29 +0200: In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516 Jiri asked for removing Copr (and Playground) DNF plugin out of dnf-plugins-core. Since this is not technical but merely political question I would like to ask wider audience: Put

Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update

Matthias Clasen píše v Čt 03. 04. 2014 v 10:20 -0400: Hey, so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have already received fairly wide testing. But we should be careful, so I want to ask for

Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

Christian Schaller píše v Čt 30. 01. 2014 v 05:40 -0500: The difference here is that the resources for GNOME (or anything else Red Hat needs for future versions of RHEL) are provided by Red Hat. So if you want the spins to the logically the same in terms of resources we should start

Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

Rahul Sundaram píše v Čt 30. 01. 2014 v 11:06 -0500: Hi On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: That being said, as we go forward as Fedora.NEXT, we start to see more clearly defined divisions between Products, Spins and Remixes.

DevConf.cz 2014 schedule is out!

Hi, I'd like to announce that the schedule of Developer Conference 2014, which also includes Fedora Day this year, is out: http://devconf.cz/schedule It features around 100 speakers of almost 20 nationalities that will have 68 talks and 30 workshops and labs. What may be especially interesting

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

Harald Hoyer píše v Čt 05. 09. 2013 v 16:51 +0200: On 09/05/2013 04:10 PM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: Hello, everybody, I'd like to know your opinion on one issue we have hit on live installations due to the DracutHostOnly feature [1]. Long story short: 1) Anaconda installs the kernel

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

Marcela Mašláňová píše v Pá 26. 07. 2013 v 10:33 +0200: On 07/26/2013 01:20 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:09:54PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 25 July 2013 16:59, Billy Crook billycr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera

Re: Fedora as an crowd founded project an additional funding source to our sponsor

Jóhann B. Guðmundsson píše v St 24. 07. 2013 v 10:01 +: On 07/24/2013 07:33 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: On 07/24/2013 03:50 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: Earlier this evening I was asked how I expected Fedora to function in any way similarly to how it does now without the

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile Fedora.next (draft of my Flock talk)

Matthew Miller píše v Po 22. 07. 2013 v 09:38 -0400: Conclusion --- * Refocus Core to provide a better platform for building on * Make room for innovation at the Ring 2 level * Empower SIGs to create solutions that fit * Won't break what we have * And we can start right

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile Fedora.next (draft of my Flock talk)

Marcela Mašláňová píše v Út 23. 07. 2013 v 18:45 +0200: On 07/23/2013 06:07 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: Matthew Miller píše v Po 22. 07. 2013 v 09:38 -0400: Conclusion --- * Refocus Core to provide a better platform for building on * Make room for innovation at the Ring 2

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

Matthew Miller píše v Pá 12. 07. 2013 v 23:24 -0400: On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:53:23PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: What do we talk about when we talk about Fedora? :) Well, we just did a major release. Go look on news.google.com for Fedora 19, or search for Fedora 19 review, or just poke

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Application Installer

Adam Williamson píše v St 10. 07. 2013 v 14:35 -0700: On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 09:51 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:02:24 +0200 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Application Installer =

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

Jóhann B. Guðmundsson píše v Čt 11. 07. 2013 v 09:17 +: On 07/10/2013 09:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 13:56 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 07/10/2013 12:36 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Plus, in relation to this - the llvmpipe issue brings up

Re: bugzilla.redhat.com vs upstream bug trackers

Emmanuel Seyman píše v Po 17. 06. 2013 v 15:39 +0200: * Jóhann B. Guðmundsson [17/06/2013 12:49] : It's package maintainers responsibility to act as the liason between upstream and Fedora thus reporters only need to report in our Bugzilla instance. Even when upstream has requested that

Does anyone still use system-config-language?

Hi, I wonder if any spin is still using system-config-language. GNOME has its own graphical utility to install language support, but AFAIK there is no counterpart in other environments, right? The problem is that system-config-language is completely broken since F18 (see [1] because it didn't

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

Dan Mashal píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 04:25 -0800: I'll tell you what, last time I checked #1 spin is KDE. 1. because the Desktop spin is not included in the counter. 2. I doubt those numbers are accurate. Only 54 downloads of Xfce spin for this release? I hope you understand it's completely out

Re: Fedora 18 issues with translations and keymaps

Adam Williamson píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 00:03 -0800: Hey, folks. I'm not really sure how to frame it, but the result of all my poking about at keyboard layout bugs and related stuff recently is that I'm pretty sad at the state of support for anything-but-U.S.-English in Fedora 18. Here's

Re: Fedora 18 issues with translations and keymaps

Jóhann B. Guðmundsson píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 12:40 +: On 01/03/2013 10:37 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: So yes, these issues are serious, but IMHO rather a long-term problem we should focus on after releasing F18. I disagree I think we need to fix those things first. Ask yourself

Re: Fedora 18 issues with translations and keymaps

drago01 píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 14:13 +0100: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Fabian Deutsch fabian.deut...@gmx.de wrote: Jiri Eischmann wrote: Adam Williamson píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 00:03 -0800: … 2. If not, do we want to engage in some Messaging around the F18 release

Re: Fedora 18 issues with translations and keymaps

drago01 píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 14:43 +0100: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote: drago01 píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 14:13 +0100: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Fabian Deutsch fabian.deut...@gmx.de wrote: Jiri Eischmann wrote: Adam Williamson

Re: Fedora 18 Beta to slip by two weeks, Beta release date is now Nov 27

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky píše v St 07. 11. 2012 v 22:06 -0800: I've now done half a dozen F18 multi-boot installs and I must say it's a miracle I haven't over-written something I wanted to keep. The thing that would make it usable for me would be very simple - just put the partition names on the

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

mike cloaked píše v Ne 04. 11. 2012 v 21:44 +: On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Jiri Eischmann jeisc...@redhat.com wrote: This is a very valid argument. I understand this is a devel list, so we should stay on the technical level, but if we

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

- Original Message - From: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to To: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Saturday, November 3, 2012 7:37:45 PM Subject: Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re:

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

Tom Lane píše v St 31. 10. 2012 v 11:08 -0400: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes: ... Practically speaking, for F18, though, I think we just need to soldier on with newUI and get it done as best we can. Obviously slipping the schedule by a week again and again in response to the

Re: 3D printing in Fedora

- Original Message - From: Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 7:31:37 PM Subject: Re: 3D printing in Fedora Hi, On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:15:06 +0100 Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz wrote: I'm not sure that a separate 3d

Re: 3D printing in Fedora

- Original Message - From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org To: Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com, Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 10:13:20 PM Subject: Re: 3D printing in Fedora On Mon, Oct 29, 2012

Re: Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?

tim.laurid...@gmail.com píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 18:51 +0200: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed several times, last time a few month ago

Re: Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?

Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200: Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01: Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result into this old mother type of user consider to use fedora. A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications.

Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?

Hi, the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed several times, last time a few month ago. I read an article about a successful Google Summer of Code project [1] whose goal was to make Software Center a distribution independent program using PackageKit. Matthias even

Re: Fedora multi-arch

We discussed it in FAmSCo and I also spoke with Fedora QA guys. They're willing to do the testing. It's not particularly difficult. What they would appreciate is building those ISOs for RC so that they can test it before the final release. So far, the multi-arch ISOs have been built only for the

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

Kamil Paral píše v Pá 20. 04. 2012 v 03:49 -0400: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 16:24 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: That is obscure UI design, and therefore doesn't resolve the current UI obscurity. So I see very little efficacy in the idea. To contribute something positive here, I went

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

Florian Müllner píše v Pá 20. 04. 2012 v 12:27 +0200: On Apr 20, 2012 11:55 AM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote: The notification is nice, but the only job it does is that it says the live system is installable. It really doesn't help the user find out how to install

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

Kamil Paral píše v Út 03. 04. 2012 v 09:26 -0400: I was quite depressed how hard it can be for a layman to find a way to install Fedora from LiveCD environment. If you don't recognize the icon in Gnome Shell Overview mode, it can give you quite some work to find it. Since OSS philosophy is