Re: Review swap: virt-v2v

2019-11-25 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
- Original Message - > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774713 > Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM > > This is actually more of a package split. This program was part of > libguestfs, but has been split out into a separate upstream

Re: In A World Where...TCs don't exist?

2016-02-08 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 09:11:49PM +0100, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Already added to our next grooming meeting. Nice. Without realizing this discussion already happened here, I asked Dennis the same question as Rich, about the status of the its (virt-builder's) metadata distribution as part of

[RFC] Python_Eggs packaging guideline clarification draft

2015-01-06 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
The topic of Python eggs came up during the discussion of this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178754 -- [abrt] python-gertty: script.py:46:__init__:CommandError: Path doesn't exist: '/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gertty/alembic'. Please use the 'init' command to

Re: [RFC] Python_Eggs packaging guideline clarification draft

2015-01-06 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 02:35:52AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Changes --- 1. Replaced the term 'eggs' with 'egg metadata' in the whole wiki, while not messing up the URLs to this[1] on both occurances. 2. In section '1.1 Why egg metadata', changed the phrase Allowing

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

2014-05-15 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:11:47AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their packages (and

Re: Server Technical Specification: Agenda and First Draft

2014-03-04 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 04:05:27PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 02:58:41PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [. . .] A single `make` job timing to compile everything on a systemd-nspawn: real31m9.792s user17m18.359s sys 13m17.868s

Re: rawhide report: 20140218 changes

2014-02-19 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:18:12AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Tue Feb 18 19:39:04 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [koji] koji-vm-1.8.0-2.fc20.noarch requires python-virtinst Ping^2? From what I see,

Re: rawhide report: 20140208 changes

2014-02-09 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:55:18PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: [. . .] [koji] koji-vm-1.8.0-2.fc20.noarch requires python-virtinst There's an F19 bug here for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958499 koji-vm should not be using python-virtinst code

Re: a stop job is running for User Manager for 0

2014-02-08 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:43:07PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: I'm using a minimal netinstall version of fedora20 for testing using KVM. We very often cycle these machines (once per test, we run hundreds of tests) I run minimal installs all the time, with either a script like that[1] or with

Re: a stop job is running for User Manager for 0

2014-02-08 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 12:35:20PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [. . .] The message is rather useless, because it does not tell me anything about the problem. Which job is still running? What is it waiting for? What's a User Manager? Who is 0? I'm not even sure at what component we

Re: official fedora image for docker available

2014-01-04 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 01/03/2014 10:46 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: The official (unprefixed) fedora image for docker is now available here: https://index.docker.io/_/fedora/ It has fedora 20 (via tags 20, heisenbug and latest) and rawhide. When cross-posting to lists like fedora-devel (where a broad range of

Re: [RFC] Easiest making kernel rpms from upstream git

2013-08-28 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 08/28/2013 07:23 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM and I have IMHO good idea to write utility, that will be build rpm w/o/ Fedora patches, changelogs, etc.

Re: Why does so much virt stuff depend on glusterfs?

2013-07-25 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 07/23/2013 10:27 PM, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:17:01PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: So this thread is complaining about.. Removing: glusterfs x86_64 3.4.0-2.fc19 @updates-testing 4.7 M Removing for dependencies:

Re: review swap?

2013-06-13 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 06/13/2013 01:59 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: Anyone interested in swapping reviews with my two pending requests? - 972943 lpf I'm waiting for some build to complete, meantime, I can try this one :) - 956134 mnmlicons-fonts Both looks in my eyes simple. All offers welcome! --alec

Re: Flock proposals now open for community voting

2013-06-04 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 06/04/2013 08:37 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:22:50AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: I disagree - this lets people judge proposed talks/sessions on what is written. I don't go to presentations because of the quality of the abstract. I go to presentations based on

Re: Flock proposals now open for community voting

2013-06-03 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 06/03/2013 10:06 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: Thanks to the Fedora Community for submitting 125 awesome talks, hackfests, sprints and workshops for Flock, our new contributor conference! We've taken those submissions and put them in the Fedora Elections web application, and now, it is time for

Re: Flock proposals now open for community voting

2013-06-03 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
The latter :-) Thanks Bill, Rahul. Sorry for this noise. Note to self: *Read* the goddamn email completely (especially at 01:00 AM) before hitting the send! -- /kashyap -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
Heya, I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16 virtual machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else. Here is some info: # [root@dhcp201-139 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 16 (Verne)

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote: Heya, I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16 virtual machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else. And no /bin/sh either? It is

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 10/11/2011 11:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 10/11/2011 08:16 PM, Jan Vcelak wrote: On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote: Kashyap Chamarthy writes: Running Transaction Check ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: /bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17

Re: Reviving packages

2011-10-11 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
rvm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219 I'm reviewing this. In accordance with Fedora policy (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package), I am posting here, and asking for help in re-reviewing these

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 10/11/2011 08:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:21:03 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote: On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote: Heya, I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16

Re: Reviving packages

2011-10-11 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 10/11/2011 11:59 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: rvm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219 I'm reviewing this. Done. In accordance with Fedora policy (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package), I

Re: serial kernel console vs. systemd

2011-05-26 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 05/20/2011 01:19 AM, Josh Stone wrote: On 05/19/2011 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: systemd does not redirect kmsg. We actually are no longer reading console= from the kernel cmdline. We now rely entirely on /sys/class/tty/console/active which gives us similar information. And we use