Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

Jul 16, 2024 17:03:22 Miro Hrončok : > On 16. 07. 24 13:28, Petr Pisar wrote: >> V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): >>> So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from >>> mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack.

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

Jul 16, 2024 13:30:00 Petr Pisar : > V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): >> So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from >> mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In mock >> you have to tell it to enable the

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

Sorry, left out that using python3.12 works until the version checker in the scons builder returns that I'm using unsupported Python3.6, hence asking whether there needs to be a switch somewhere *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedo

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

on3 to the proper version? *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60* Jul 15, 2024 19:48:56 Stephen Smoogen : > On Mon, 15 Jul 2

Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

I want to make a minor update to an EPEL 8 package, but the default Python is 3.6 where the update requires >=3.7 Is this possible to do (with modules?)? How would I specify it in the spec file if it is? *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora

Re: Error building new package in sidetag

Thanks, Kevin and Mikel Looks good now *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60* Jul 14, 2024 22:59:14 Kevin Fenzi : > On Sun,

Re: Error building new package in sidetag

ree  0 open  1 done  1 failed 120492157 build (f40-candidate, /rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596) failed *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fin

Error building new package in sidetag

Hi all, I am adding a few new dependencies to update a golang package (nothing new here) and building the new packages and update in a sidetag for F40. However, for one of the new dependencies, there is a repeated error: "FAILED: BuildError: package golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter not in list

Re: mockbuild fails locally: dnf v dnf5

ok, so perhaps I needed to use `sudo` previously - I ended up manually wiping the `/var/lib/mock/ directory contents and that fixed me up Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C

Re: mockbuild fails locally: dnf v dnf5

Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to do the trick - the `mock --scrub=all` runs, but then the same error keeps occurring on both systems Any other thoughts as to how to more aggressively/manually force an update? Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefulle

mockbuild fails locally: dnf v dnf5

Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 Hi all, I am having consistent issues on F39 and Rawhide with locally using mockbuild: ``` Start

Strange(?) build failures for golang package

I am trying to update go-task for some time now and consistently getting a build error/failure with no clear indication of what's happened: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06508072-golang-github-task/builder-live.log.gz Is it possible t

orphaning prometheus* and some other golang packages

Hi all, I picked up a number of prometheus packages (see below) a few months back during the golang scramble after an unresponsive maintainer. I don't have the time or the interest (or the technical chops) to maintain them. Obviously these are important packages, so at this time I am announci

Review-swap: trivial golang package to update nats stack

I'd like to offer to swap reviews to get golang-github-nats-io-jwt-2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237326 into Rawhide We already have v1 and attempting to update that package in order to upgrade the nats stack led to some breakage and headaches a few months ago Thanks all, ful

process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

Hi all, I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a re-review. However, since the package still exists in F37 and F38, the process for getting the F39 and rawhide branches "back" and getting control of the package repo is unclear. Can anyone advise? Thanks, fu

Go-SIG: One re-review and one update needed

Dear Go-list (and broader Fedora dev list), I've been dragging on getting an update to go-task done - I need to request a (re)review of golang-github-google-renameio-2 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231733) as a dependency of golang-mvdan-sh-3 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b

Assistance unretiring branches of package

Hi all, In order to update go-task, I need to unretire branches for F39 and Rawhide of https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-google-renameio-2 (and then update the package) It's not clear to me how to proceed since the package is not orphaned (and the maintainer did not respond t

non-responsive maintainer check for anthr76

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964 This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for anthr76, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/. Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maint

Re: Stuck package - golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter

I'll try to push this along - there's a build error that needs resolving (but not at 2:30 AM) see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112130 Anyone from the golang list want to take a look? -fuller On 02/05/2023 19:25, Pat Riehecky wrote: golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter seems

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

Thanks for the suggestion, but I do not use Twitter and don't want to create an account. On March 15, 2023 5:13:43 PM GMT+02:00, Fabio Valentini wrote: >On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:04 PM Mark E. Fuller >wrote: >> >> Hi, >> This is a non-responsive maintainer check

Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

Hi, This is a non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo. I am trying to contact him as the owner of golang-github-masterminds-semver[0]. There is one other open non-responsive maintainer check, filed ~2 weeks ago[1]. Does anyone know how to contact eclipseo? Thanks, fuller [0] https://bugz

Review Swaps

spec, should be a trivial review. 2) Bug 2126785 - Review Request: usbrelay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126785 USB-connected electrical relay control, based on hidapi Thank you -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedo

EPEL: packaging multiple versions and compat packages

Hi all, Can someone point me to a good resource on how (if permitted) I can make appropriate compat(?) packages to allow for two major versions of the same package to be available? Is this allowed for EPEL? Thanks -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev

Non-responsive maintainer-like policy for approved packages that aren't imported?

is now blocking a current review (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2074467) Thanks -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C

Re: Request: Airspy HF+

tance with getting the software into the distribution over a lament that we do not have it. Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 10/

Permission errors with fedora-review and mock

fix this? I verified that I am in the mock group -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@member.fsf.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

~ scons: *** [build/temp-py/_cantera.os] Error 1 scons: building terminated because of errors. ``` See: https://github.com/Cantera/cantera/issues/1325 Also: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2453/88502453/build.log Best, -fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. HaShikma

Re: go version unknown?

Thanks - that fixed it Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 19/06/2022 0:52, Martin Jackson wrote: On Sun, 2022-06-19 at 00:02 +0300, Mark E

go version unknown?

ks, fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

go version unknown?

ks, fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Re: Request: Airspy HF+

re.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 OpenPGP_0xD599E76CFFCABF60.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature D

Review swaps

gi?id=2093467 All three spec files were generated automatically and the reviews should be trivial (at least I hope so). Thanks all, fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F

Help with go spec file

naive use case. 2) How should nested folders in cmd/ be built? Here, again, the basic template throws an error since cmd/internal contains no *.go files, only a BUILD.bezel file and a nested cmd directory. Thank you all, fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@sto

Re: Question on creating system users/groups at install in spec file

That did it - thank you very much! On 30/04/2022 23:26, Paweł Marciniak wrote: I think you need %pre -n the same for %preun %post %postun or all systemd macros will not work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Question on creating system users/groups at install in spec file

pm Thanks -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Help with packaging golang binary: resolving dependencies

ource} Source1:https://github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/archive/master.tar.gz Source2: https://github.com/radovskyb/watcher/archive/refs/tags/v1.0.7.tar.gz Source3:https://github.com/mattn/go-zglob/archive/master.tar.gz ... Any help is very appreciated, Regards, -- Mark E. Fuller, P

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36

I have the following errors: Error: Problem 1: package avogadro-libs-1.2.0-35.fc35.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.2.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libGLEW-2.1.0-10.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package avogadro-libs-1.2.0

Re: ppc64le build failures in the mass rebuild

My spec for cantera currently has an "excludearch" for ppc64le since the rawhide builds were failing - should I drop this allow for the releng tools to automatically find and rebuild it? Thanks 31 Jan 2022 16:47:07 Sérgio Basto : > On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 13:36 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: >> On Mon,

Re: Request assistance getting a package (usbrelay) into Fedora

so we can move off the list. Best, fuller Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 18/01/2022 5:04, Darryl Bond wrote: Mark, Petr's suggestio

Re: Request assistance getting a package (usbrelay) into Fedora

I was having so much fun playing with). Best, Fuller Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 17/01/2022 12:43, Darryl Bond wrote: Hello, I maintain a

Package Review / Sponsorship Request

appreciate any constructive feedback and am looking for a sponsor. I am particularly interested in having the package ultimately available in EPEL as this would make installation on many HPC resources very simple. Regards, Fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful

Another self-introduction

y own programming improves with my research. Regards -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. Robensstraße 57 52070 Aachen +49 (0)1577-1848188 +1 401-366-2771 mark.e.ful...@gmail.com mark.e.ful...@gmx.de @mefuller:matrix.org https://mefuller.github.io/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: eclipse-photran builds failed/not included since F32

Am Samstag, dem 26.12.2020 um 22:10 +0100 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: > On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 02:13, Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > I'm not quite sure where else to direct this - I intermittently do > > some > > Fortran work and the Eclipse

eclipse-photran builds failed/not included since F32

ether eclipse-photran is being (intentionally) dropped and alternatives? Thanks all -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. Robensstraße 57 52070 Aachen +49 (0)1577-1848188 +1 401-366-2771 mark.e.ful...@gmail.com mark.e.ful...@gmx.de @mefuller:matrix.org https://mefuller.gith

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

__ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.