Why not zfs?
On 6/26/2020 10:42 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BtrfsByDefault
>
> == Summary ==
>
> For laptop and workstation installs of Fedora, we want to provide file
> system features to users in a transparent fashion. We want to add new
> features, while
It should really be no more effort than running your puppet agent or an
ansible job. Those are minor configuration changes and are easily
automated.
Also, stopdisablingselinux.com ;)
On 6/25/2020 2:50 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> With each such
> step it takes more and more effort to make a new
Makes sense to me. Many people do not know how to use vi/vim and don't
want to spend time learning arcane commands just to edit a bit of text.
This would also put Fedora in line with other distros such as Ubuntu.
Those of us who actually *want* to use a different editor can also
easily change
This is one reason I vastly prefer decentralized platforms such as
mailing lists and Usenet. You can't unsend an email.
On 3/19/2020 4:20 PM, Ty Young wrote:
> Oh, and when called out about the censorship on places like Medium &
> Reddit, people who apparently have the ability to uncensor
On 1/22/20 1:56 AM, Michal Konecny wrote:
> If we go this way, in a few years we will end up in the same situation
> as with Pagure today. We will have many custom patches (which we need
> to take care of) and we will not have manpower to compete with the
> features of other major git forges.
On 1/21/20 4:59 PM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> (Though
> I somehow got used to pagure and getting the gitlab integration to the same
> level as pagure currently will be a lot of work for sure.)
Maybe I'm just a grumpy old system admin but it sounds like a lot of
work for little, if any, gain.
On 1/21/20 4:31 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:04 pm, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> And any discussion of GitHub isn't going to involve self-hosted, it's
>> going to involve GitHub.com, which means we're talking about losing
>> more of our independence as a project. This is one
It would be in RedHat's own best interest to promote the Fedora project
more though. Isn't Fedora supposed to be the upstream/testing grounds
for RHEL releases? What's the best way to learn and get familiar with a
RedHat based environment? It's Fedora, although I do know RHEL offers
free
I'd say that backward compatibility is important and as a Fedora
workstation and server user I expect crond to work OOTB. Yes, users can
install and enable the service if needed but cron is such an essential
part of every system that I see no reason to exclude it.
On 4/11/19 6:30 AM, Brian (bex)
You mean like systemd? ;)
On 4/10/19 7:10 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> Adding software the user doesn't want
> to have it as assumed for other users is always a trade-off.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Not just web sites. Changes in Firefox and Chrome have already made
working with embedded devices such as DRAC and storage servers nearly
impossible. IMO there needs to be a fallback option to still allow
access to "insecure" sites that still use TLS 1.0 or older certificates
that still use
Well said. Seems like Fedora is slowly turning into Fisher Price My
First Linux instead of being a distro that actually respects its users.
IME people that run Fedora usually know what they're doing and trying to
obfuscate and hide things simply makes the distro *harder* to use.
On 06/01/2018
What about users that don't use a graphical login manager? Personally I
*like* seeing boot messages so that I know what is going on.
Having the menu available is also quite useful for booting into rescue
mode or selecting a different kernel.
On 05/31/2018 06:23 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi
On 12/4/17 7:03 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 03:11 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Also, for any kind of early boot troubleshooting even once a user is
>> created, systemd emergency and rescue targets only accept root user
>> login. If root user is disabled, it's impossible to do such
-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:05:38PM -0500, Michael Watters wrote:
>> package cronie-anacron-1.5.1-2.fc24.x86_64 requires cronie =
>> 1.5.1-2.fc24, but none of the providers can be installed.
>> package cryptsetup-1.7.2-1.fc24.x86_64 requires cryptsetup-libs =
>
I have a server running Fedora 24 which I am attempting to upgrade to
Fedora 25. I've followed the instructions located at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade however the upgrade
process fails after the system is rebooted to run the initial upgrade.
Here are the log entries from my
Ideally the package should have an upgrade script included to translate
any values set in /etc/sysconfig/nfs into /etc/nfs.conf. I also believe
it would be best to hold off any breaking changes until Fedora 26.
On 1/16/17 5:24 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> I can't agree with this more... How does
17 matches
Mail list logo
