Well done on Boltron - still kicking the tires.
I for one, still want multi-version install capability for full modularity
scl, docker, flatpacks are journeys towards that destination - backend
build infra just has to be a lot smarter.
-subhendu
___
Software collections for a segregated sane dep chain
On Apr 26, 2017 19:22, "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 21:18, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 26/04/17 17:08, Lee Howard wrote:
> > On 04/25/2017 01:39 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>
On Feb 10, 2017 16:27, "Chris Murphy" wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Chris
Nope. The monitoring works with dmeventd, but I'm not sure how
sophisticated the monitoring is or what messaging method it uses
(dbus?) or what monitors it (udisksd or storaged?). But again, the
loss of email no
On Jan 20, 2017 21:57, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 19:48 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/20/2017 05:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 01:13 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Only the NSA can think that
> > > duplicating knowledge about ALL programs in
On Jan 3, 2017 8:00 AM, "Ralf Corsepius" wrote:
On 01/03/2017 01:33 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 03 January 2017 at 13:18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2017 11:53 AM, Martin Gansser wrote:
>>
>>> i am the package maintainer of boomaga and users told me that
>>>
Not really. A number of environments I know deploy nfsroot and stateless
systems.
On Nov 23, 2016 19:37, "Samuel Sieb" wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 07:39 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
>> Is it supposed to be supported to install RPMs onto NFS filesystems?
>> Apparently NFSv3 doesn't support capabilities
Assuming cloud-init can also select the storage or is that too late in the
process?
On Nov 16, 2016 15:58, "Vivek Goyal" wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:19:06PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 11/16/2016 03:09 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:01:06PM -0500, Step
Packaging methods should not be used for this requirement. You should be
using some system automation tools like Ansible or Puppet or Chef to make
that transaction complete smoothly.
Openshift uses Ansible for their cluster upgrades.
___
devel mailing li
Is ostree remotes in scope?
On May 12, 2016 03:37, "Jan Kurik" wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir
> =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Neal Gompa
> * Jan Silhan
>
>
> == Detailed Descriptio
If we assume that image is immutable, how does one expect the applications
configuration and data to be managed? Are there additional ENV handlers
inside the container that might not be present otherwise in the RPM world?
Is there are requirement for volume mounts for certain locations inside the
c
Well done.
On Apr 9, 2016 10:13, "Dennis Gilmore" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just wanted to let you know that yesterday we enabled building armhfp
> docker
> base images for branched and rawhide. They will land on the mirrors next to
> the x86_64 docker base image
>
> http://download.fedoraproject.or
Do we have zypper in Fedora?
Perhaps we should give that a try?
On Feb 3, 2016 23:28, "Felix Miata" wrote:
> I have lots of test installations using identical partition sizes for EXT3
> or
> EXT4 / filesystems. the filesystem space these provided is adequate on all
> if
> running Mageia or openS
On Nov 6, 2015 9:52 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
> who is responsible that nothing is forwarded to the traditional syslog?
> systemd or rsyslog?
>
Journald is probably hold the log socket and not forwarding to syslog
> /var/lib/rsyslog/imjournal.state exists and get re-created when it is
deleted
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> ...
>
> To allow or not allow bundling is the small side point here - the questions
> should be more of "Are we a distribution of packages? Are we an OS? Where
> do we see the distribution/OS fit in how software is consumed and provid
Adding Harald to thread.
Seems to be nominally related boot path with deo and dm-crypt.
Adding to Dracut might be preferable to creating a separate PBA
Subhendu
On Jul 23, 2015 10:20 AM, "Chuck Anderson" wrote:
>
> I originally sent this to the packaging list, but there was no
> response there
On Aug 25, 2013 12:17 AM, "Till Maas" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the comps git repo currently contains comps files for EOL releases,
> which makes "grep" more cumbersome, because one needs to specify the
> current non-EOL releases to grep only in them. Also it makes the default
> make target take unecessa
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > In the OS/App differentiation, you are expecting each is coming from a
> different source.
> > Apps are either boxed, or coming from a project.
> > The app provider should fix their version of libxml, and the OS provider
> should fix th
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > but to say a core / apps separation is fundamentally flawed is incorrect
>
> it is correct
>
> * go and play around with "ldd /usr/bin/whatever-application
> * look how many share openssl, nspr, nss, libxml and a lot of more
> * and now dra
2 types of OS - headless servers and UI enabled systems. Need to cater for
both.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:02 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> >>
> >> No one said that stuff should change "unexpectedly" (and that's not
> >> what currently happens eit
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> However, having the /usr/sbin/sendmail API available to applications
> is valuable - it brings a significant system administration benefit of
> centralizing the SMTP configuration.
>
Then the app packaging can have a dependency on sendmai
You should take a look at the oVirt project and the oVirt node build process
On Jun 13, 2013 9:56 AM, "Eugene Pivnev" wrote:
> I want to create subj (VM server - minimal CentOS 6 x64 + libvirtd) but
> don't know - how to do this.
> Without locally installed CentOS.
> Anakonda? Koji?
> --
> devel
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
>> so why is MariaDB not obsoleting mysql without all
>> this versioning tricks and "mysql-oracle" installs
>> the server under "/usr/local/mysql-oracle/" and
>> provides a "mysql-oracle.service"?
>
>
> This is simply not possible in Fedora:
> ht
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I think the real lesson is that platforms should take backwards
> compatibility more seriously. The single best decision that libvirt
> has ever made was to promise to support the libvirt API and ABI
> forever. If you wrote a program a
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> 3) It's the ecosystem. If using Software Collections on RHEL is good for
>your company, it's good for it to work on Fedora, because a) we're the
>upstream and problems get worked out here, b) development resources
>benefit Fedora
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 5.12.2012 22:14, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>
>> I cant seem to find any specific fpc ticket where they discussed this,
>> but I am pretty sure it was brought up before there. I'd check with
>> them...
>
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/1
25 matches
Mail list logo
