Re: Orphaning my packages

2017-03-22 Thread Tim Lauridsen
settings: > https://github.com/timlau/dnf-daemon/settings (there will be a > "transfer repository" button at the bottom of the page). > > Thanks. > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > > Hi Guys > > > > Because of work and personal life, I h

Orphaning my packages

2017-03-22 Thread Tim Lauridsen
someone is interested in taking over the project or part of it, then please contact me and I give access to the repositories on github. Thanks to all there yumex users over the years and I'm sorry that I can't continue the project. Thanks for all the good times under the Fedora umbr

Re: frafra uploaded yumex-dnf-4.1.6.tar.gz for yumex-dnf

2015-12-28 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 at 11:41 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 09:38:25AM +0000, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > >Looks like a false alarm, just a scatch build > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294377 > > Why uploading sources to dist-gi

Re: frafra uploaded yumex-dnf-4.1.6.tar.gz for yumex-dnf

2015-12-28 Thread Tim Lauridsen
Looks like a false alarm, just a scatch build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294377 Tim On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 at 10:38 Tim Lauridsen wrote: > How do i handle a situation where someone, without my knowledge uploads > new sources to one of my projects. It could be a security p

Fwd: frafra uploaded yumex-dnf-4.1.6.tar.gz for yumex-dnf

2015-12-28 Thread Tim Lauridsen
How do i handle a situation where someone, without my knowledge uploads new sources to one of my projects. It could be a security problem ? Tim -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 at 23:00 Subject: frafra uploaded yumex-dnf-4.1.6.tar.gz for yumex-dnf 0ae84309cbb

Re: lxqt

2015-12-23 Thread Tim Lauridsen
This is not a yumex-dnf issue, it works fine in other DE's, Other lxqt users have had this issue, I don't know what the solution is Tim On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 at 10:13 mastaiza wrote: > This is not a problem, it is a problem with lxqt, there dont have a > working polkit gui setup out of the box. >

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-06-08 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Wed, 27 May 2015 at 17:19 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Having keywords makes the search functionality much > > > better, but isn't actually required for your application to be shown > > > in the software center. > > What would

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-13 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 at 10:22 Reindl Harald > > > Now, I admit that the second half is limping a bit. The information is > > available but it's not as easily accessible as you want it to be. If you > want > > to help us, I invite you to write a plugin that will show the > information you > > seek i

review swap : yumex-dnf

2015-04-09 Thread Tim Lauridsen
Hi. I have submitted yumex-dnf for inclusion into fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210430 yumex-dnf is a rewritten version of yumex, based on dnf instead of yum you can check it out here https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/timlau/yumex-dnf If you want to review it, then ple

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-08 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 at 11:05 drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:33 +0200, drago01 wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > Am 07.04.2015 um 17:53 schrieb Ralf Corsepius: > >> > >

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-07 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 at 17:54 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:07:08 -0600, > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > >dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already. > > Not when installing packages. > > > > >If thats not working and you need to find out more, add '--best' to

Re: dnf debug-info-install

2015-04-07 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 at 14:10 Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > I want 'dnf debug-info-install' to be available by default on > Workstation. Right now it lives in the dnf-plugins-extras package, > which depends on snapper, which we can't install by default. > > Can this plugin please move to dnf-p

Re: F21 downloads repository metadata in 3 places!

2014-12-17 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 9:09:59 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > Fresh installation of Fedora 21 Workstation, accepting defaults, I > then reboot and notice the following contents of /var/cache, filtering > out things not relevant for this discussion (which also happen to not > change between the three sta

Re: Suspend/resume broken on Lenovo laptops (Fedora 21 beta)

2014-11-11 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Tue Nov 11 2014 at 6:25:35 PM valent.turko...@gmail.com < valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote: > Guys and galls, > if you have Lenovo laptop please install latest Fedora 21 beta and > provide feedback because there are reported cases that suspend/resume > doesn't work on Lenovo laptops. > > Curren

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-24 Thread Tim Lauridsen
> > > "Drop" as in "use yum for that, but dnf for the new versions"? That > > sounds reasonable. > > Well reality is f-r is mostly for checking *current* Fedora > guidelines that in some cases apply only to rawhide. If someone is > running f-r on a system from 4 years ago to verify current packagin

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-24 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri Oct 24 2014 at 4:01:20 PM Stanislav Ochotnicky < sochotni...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri 24 Oct 2014 02:26:37 PM CEST Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > Hi > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > >> > >> Yes, switch the defaults ASAP. Thanks > >> > > > > FWIW, there is

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-24 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri Oct 24 2014 at 1:23:27 PM Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > >> >> Mock still defaults to yum, but supports dnf also using >> config_opts['package_manager']='dnf' >> >> So it

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-24 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri Oct 24 2014 at 12:46:41 PM Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Michael Simacek wrote: > >> >> Mock-1.2 no longer depends on yum API and has been ported to use DNF. >> So if you use the new version and set config_opts['package_manager']='dnf' >> and also install

Re: fedora 21 lets me install packages without root

2014-10-20 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 20 October 2014 18:00, Reindl Harald wrote: > > uninstall anything in context of packagekit and just use yum > > Please stop giving advice like this. If you try to remove PackageKit > you'll end up removing half of GNOME and probably ma

Re: Review swap

2014-10-17 Thread Tim Lauridsen
> I am still in need of a reviewer. Who can help me out? I'm willing > to review for you in exchange. > -- > I will take it later today, if nobody beat me to it :) Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Cond

Re: Can you help with making fonts awesome in Fedora 21?

2014-10-16 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > If you maintain a font in Fedora, or are a provenpackager, I could > really need your help this weekend. Basically, we want to implement > AppStream metadata[1] for all the fonts we want to show in the > software center. I've already made

Re: dnf on debuglevel

2014-10-05 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Balint Szigeti wrote: > > p.s. > Can someone tell me how dnf tells the new (uninstalled packages) > changelog? I tried to do it with yum but the only way that I found is yum > changelog plugin which tell the changelog after I downloaded the packages. > Isn't a way

Review Swap : dnfdaemon - Dbus daemon for dnf package actions

2014-10-04 Thread Tim Lauridsen
If someone would review this one and let me know what to review Review Request: dnfdaemon - Dbus daemon for dnf package actions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149390 Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fed

Re: Proposal: Increasing application icon sizes to 64px

2014-10-02 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > Designing an application for the lowest common denominator does not > give you a high-quality cohesive application that's easy to use and > nice on the eye. It gives you a miss-mash of ugly noise that's hard to > use. I think it's fine that

Re: Proposal: Increasing application icon sizes to 64px

2014-10-01 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > At the moment applications have to provide an icon >= 32x32px in size > to be included in the AppStream metadata and shown in the software > center. This is *tiny* on a HiDPI screen, so should I mandate that all > applications ship a 64x64

postr orphaned

2014-09-27 Thread Tim Lauridsen
I have orphaned postr a flicker uploader, I have not used it for years Upstream has been stalled for years, but there has been some recent activity latest upstream release is 0.13.1 not yet in fedora, because of python-bsddb3 is not in fedora, only python3-bsddb3 is. Tim -- devel mailing list de

Re: comps categories: are they any use to anyone any more?

2014-06-23 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Yeah, you're probably right. In that case we should probably explain the > difference somewhere - are you aware of anywhere it's currently written > down? There are no comments in the comps.xml files, no documentation in > comps.git, and t

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-22 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Where should the RFE be filed? Bugzilla againt dnf or dnf-plugins-core Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org

Re: comps categories: are they any use to anyone any more?

2014-06-22 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > on the other hand, there's a clear overlap with 'environment groups'. it > seems like we kinda have one type of group too many. :P > environments is something you can install, categories is not, they fit different a purpose Tim -- devel

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-21 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Tim, > > Is there anyone working on a protected packages plugin for Dnf? In the > past, it has helped users avoid trashing their systems due to bugs in > package-cleanup and so on. So it is not just the command line users of the > direc

Re: repodata - xz

2014-06-21 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Jon wrote: > Would it be too much trouble to use the sqlite data in DNF? > I suppose it would be a step backwards to have our primary (future) > tool using gzip metadata. > the information in the sqlite files is orded i a way the yum is using the data, dnf parses

Re: comps categories: are they any use to anyone any more?

2014-06-21 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Check the post-install tools; I believe at least one of apper or yumex > still > uses them. Yes, Yumex is still using categories to organize groups, both in the current stable release and in nextgen release based on the dnf api. Remov

Re: repodata - xz

2014-06-21 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > because thats how createrepo works. the gzipped files are not ones you > download. yum and dnf use the sqlite files. > yum is using the sqlite files, dnf uses the .xml.gz files -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://a

Re: DNF: why does it refresh metadata all the time

2014-06-21 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > Also for years Debian supplies short update 'diffs' - so user doesn't have > to download multiple MB sized files - just couple short small files - again > something much nicer then running a daemon to download tens of MB on > background dai

Re: DNF: why does it refresh metadata all the time

2014-06-20 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > In testing dnf on rawhide I nearly always do "dnf clean metadata && dnf > update" purely because I found most of the time dnfs metadata was out of > date. To me dnf fetching the metadata behind the scenes just doesn't work > right. But I'm

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

2014-06-16 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Zing wrote: > > Does yum have current developers/maintainers? If so, actually obsoleting > yum seems kind of rude to me. If that's the case why not just leave yum > as is? Those that want to use yum use yum and dnf use dnf. I don't know the plans, but yum is

Re: dnf replacement for yum-cron

2014-06-16 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Been using yum-cron for years with good results. > > If yum is being phased out, I'll want a dnf-cron replacement > > dnf's cache is updated by by a systemd service, not dynamic when executed like yum. so if yum-cron is only used to update the

Re: dnf replacement for yum-cron

2014-06-16 Thread Tim Lauridsen
Bugzilla is the right place for a an RFE, not fdl :) Tim On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Been using yum-cron for years with good results. > > If yum is being phased out, I'll want a dnf-cron replacement > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https:/

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF

2014-06-14 Thread Tim Lauridsen
Come on, every thing in Fedora changes all the time, It is hard for me to see the fuzz about having to type 'dnf install foobar', instead of 'yum install foobar' If you uses a tool like yum at the command line, you should be able to handle that. more novice users will use gui tool and don't care

Re: Replace Yum With DNF

2014-06-13 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > Is there a "migration for users and developers" document? A page with > yum commands on the left and corresponding commands with dnf on the > right. Including developer things like scripts from yum-utils > (yum-builddep etc). > > Thanks. >

Re: Replace Yum With DNF

2014-06-13 Thread Tim Lauridsen
It alredy has, it is called dnf-plugins-core all tools in dnf is implemented as plugins there is extending the dnf command line Tim On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:11 PM, David wrote: > Excuse me. > > To whom, or to where, should I write to request that dnf has a tools > package like yum has. "Yum-

Re: Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core?

2014-04-24 Thread Tim Lauridsen
I have started a new dnf-utils project for commuty plugins/addons there is not maintain by the core dnf team https://github.com/timlau/dnf-utils copr / playground is welcome here is the core dnf developers, think its dont fit into dnf-plugins.core It is not submitted as a fedora package yet, but

Re: Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core?

2014-04-24 Thread Tim Lauridsen
If you want people to vote for something, It would be a good idea to say why and what the pro/cons is for having copr as a separate package. Tim On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516 > Jiri asked for removing Copr (and

Re: What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next

2014-03-20 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > - Original Message - > > Workstation might implement easy installation of alternative desktops in > > the GNOME Software app at some point. > > Urgh. This is just moving the problem from the installer/media selection > to the > sof

What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next

2014-03-19 Thread Tim Lauridsen
What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next ? The Workstation WG, looks like a Gnome only thing, will there be at place of users of other DE's in Fedora.next ? Best Regards Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

2014-03-07 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Satyajit Sahoo wrote: > Apps with ugly icons and ugly design results in bad user experience > IMO. They should not be displayed in the software center > The quaility of an application has nothing todo, with at fancy icon, not showning the icon is ok, but don't show

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

2014-03-06 Thread Tim Lauridsen
Not showing app, because they have bad looking icons, seems like a bad idea to me. what about using some cairo magic to merge the .xpm icon with some other .png frame to make it look better http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10983739/how-to-composite-multiple-png-into-a-single-png-using-gtk-cairo

Re: packages from bitbucket

2014-02-26 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > Bitbucket has downloads support. > > Also you can get the tarball from the tags. > > What's the problem? > > > The problem with this project is that there is no release tags, so you cant get a specific version, just download the current m

Re: packages from bitbucket

2014-02-26 Thread Tim Lauridsen
Seems like bitbucket uses unversioned tar ball, not the best approch https://bitbucket.org/yarosla/httpress/get/tip.tar.gz I would make my own tarball from the git checkout and document in the spec how to make it https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control Tim

Re: Copr

2013-11-07 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dear developers and Fedora contributors, > > let me introduce Copr: > > http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/ > > Copr is a build system for third party repositories. It is intended for: > * upstream teams - to make nightly and test build

Re: AppData questions

2013-11-07 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 6 November 2013 10:41, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > # rpm -qf /usr/share/app-info/xmls/fedora-20.xml.gz > > gnome-software-3.10.3-1.fc20.x86_64 > > does. > > It's AppStream metadata. Whould it not be a good idea to have it in a sepa

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-11-01 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Ray Strode wrote: > Small errors here: > >Control want package repositories there is enabled for current > session > > maybe should be: > >Control what package repositories are enabled for the current > session > Thanks, fixed upstream Tim -- devel maili

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-11-01 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > > You've got some odd non-utf8 char as the very first byte in the file: > > Looks like the editor has written an Unicode BOM, after removing that it validates ok Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorap

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-11-01 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:30 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Tim Lauridsen > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen > wrote: > >> > >> Great, thanks for doing that. > >> > >> Noticed while q

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-11-01 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Great, thanks for doing that. > > Noticed while quickly looking over the file: > > - it is not valid xml: & needs to be escaped as & > > - 'gui' is not a great term to use. I'd suggest rewording the first > sentence maybe as 'Yum extender i

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-11-01 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Pete Travis wrote: > Hmm... It sounds like yumex would be much more discoverable if it included > an appdata file :) Done, https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/82198add9daabcfcabe9d8bb7a28ef3190e920d7/misc/yumex-appdata.xml Tim -- devel mailing list devel@list

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-11-01 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > Packages are not interesting to desktop users, they > are just an implementation detail of how to get something done. e.g. > "Play my media file", "Open this document someone sent to me". Anyone > wanting to do things like "install a mysql

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > It isn't a *package* management application. It's an *application* > management application, ie., it only handles packages that are desktop > applications (and therefore have desktop files associated with them). > > I'm guessing power users tha

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 12:13 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > > I have tested gnome-software to see the current state, compaired to > > gpk in F19, there is a lot stuff there cant be done. > > > > > > 1. You

Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Tim Lauridsen
I have tested gnome-software to see the current state, compaired to gpk in F19, there is a lot stuff there cant be done. 1. You cant install backgrounds / icons 2. Not all application found in the menu, can be found under installed, you can search for them and find them, but cant remove them (ex.

Re: Could someone help me with writing polkit rule?

2013-10-25 Thread Tim Lauridsen
Yes, I think so The policy is to config pkexec to run something as root The rule is to make the group get permission without having to enter a root/admin password Tim On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2013/10/25 tim.laurid...@gmail.com : > > It is some time ago it was fi