Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

Jul 16, 2024 17:03:22 Miro Hrončok : > On 16. 07. 24 13:28, Petr Pisar wrote: >> V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): >>> So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from >>> mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack.

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

Jul 16, 2024 13:30:00 Petr Pisar : > V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): >> So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from >> mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In mock >> you have to tell it to enable the

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

Sorry, left out that using python3.12 works until the version checker in the scons builder returns that I'm using unsupported Python3.6, hence asking whether there needs to be a switch somewhere *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedo

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

on3 to the proper version? *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60* Jul 15, 2024 19:48:56 Stephen Smoogen : > On Mon, 15 Jul 2

Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

I want to make a minor update to an EPEL 8 package, but the default Python is 3.6 where the update requires >=3.7 Is this possible to do (with modules?)? How would I specify it in the spec file if it is? *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora

Re: Error building new package in sidetag

Thanks, Kevin and Mikel Looks good now *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60* Jul 14, 2024 22:59:14 Kevin Fenzi : > On Sun,

Re: Error building new package in sidetag

ree  0 open  1 done  1 failed 120492157 build (f40-candidate, /rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596) failed *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fin

Error building new package in sidetag

pendencies and built everything in rawhide. Thanks, fuller-- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/c

Re: mockbuild fails locally: dnf v dnf5

ok, so perhaps I needed to use `sudo` previously - I ended up manually wiping the `/var/lib/mock/ directory contents and that fixed me up Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C

Re: mockbuild fails locally: dnf v dnf5

Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to do the trick - the `mock --scrub=all` runs, but then the same error keeps occurring on both systems Any other thoughts as to how to more aggressively/manually force an update? Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefulle

mockbuild fails locally: dnf v dnf5

Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 Hi all, I am having consistent issues on F39 and Rawhide with locally using mockbuild: ``` Start

Strange(?) build failures for golang package

I am trying to update go-task for some time now and consistently getting a build error/failure with no clear indication of what's happened: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06508072-golang-github-task/builder-live.log.gz Is it pos

Re: orphaning prometheus* and some other golang packages

done - thanks for stepping up Mikel On 07/10/2023 15:16, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: Hi Mark, Hau idatzi du Mark E. Fuller (ful...@fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak (2023 urr. 7(a), lr. (12:22)): > > Hi all, > > I picked up a number of prometheus packages (see below) a few months &

orphaning prometheus* and some other golang packages

ang-github-prometheus-community-runit golang-opentelemetry-otel golang-google-grpc Best, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Condu

Review-swap: trivial golang package to update nats stack

s all, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:

process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

advise? Thanks, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Gu

Go-SIG: One re-review and one update needed

t.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084291) which needs updating to build the latest go-task. Obviously I'm willing to swap my own time and effort against getting these tasks completed. Regards, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Assistance unretiring branches of package

spond to a bug report) Thanks, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

non-responsive maintainer check for anthr76

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964 This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for anthr76, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/. Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maint

Re: Stuck package - golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter

I'll try to push this along - there's a build error that needs resolving (but not at 2:30 AM) see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112130 Anyone from the golang list want to take a look? -fuller On 02/05/2023 19:25, Pat Riehecky wrote: golang-github-prometheus-node-expo

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

Thanks for the suggestion, but I do not use Twitter and don't want to create an account. On March 15, 2023 5:13:43 PM GMT+02:00, Fabio Valentini wrote: >On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:04 PM Mark E. Fuller >wrote: >> >> Hi, >> This is a non-responsive maintainer check

Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

Hi, This is a non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo. I am trying to contact him as the owner of golang-github-masterminds-semver[0]. There is one other open non-responsive maintainer check, filed ~2 weeks ago[1]. Does anyone know how to contact eclipseo? Thanks, fuller [0] https

Review Swaps

spec, should be a trivial review. 2) Bug 2126785 - Review Request: usbrelay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126785 USB-connected electrical relay control, based on hidapi Thank you -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedo

EPEL: packaging multiple versions and compat packages

Hi all, Can someone point me to a good resource on how (if permitted) I can make appropriate compat(?) packages to allow for two major versions of the same package to be available? Is this allowed for EPEL? Thanks -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev

Non-responsive maintainer-like policy for approved packages that aren't imported?

is now blocking a current review (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2074467) Thanks -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C

Re: Request: Airspy HF+

tance with getting the software into the distribution over a lament that we do not have it. Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 10/

Re: Permission errors with fedora-review and mock

Thank you very much - that fixed it On 27/06/2022 22:50, Jerry James wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 12:33 PM Mark E. Fuller wrote: > Up to a couple days ago, mock and fedora-review were working fine for > me, but just recently I have started getting permission errors: > > ``` >

Permission errors with fedora-review and mock

fix this? I verified that I am in the mock group -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@member.fsf.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

~ scons: *** [build/temp-py/_cantera.os] Error 1 scons: building terminated because of errors. ``` See: https://github.com/Cantera/cantera/issues/1325 Also: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2453/88502453/build.log Best, -fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. HaShikma

Re: go version unknown?

Thanks - that fixed it Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 19/06/2022 0:52, Martin Jackson wrote: On Sun, 2022-06-19 at 00:02 +0300, Mark E

go version unknown?

is not working on the desktop and I am instead getting `go version unknown linux/amd64` instead of a proper version. I've tried reinstalling and and also completely removing and reinstalling `golang`, but it's still the same. Any suggestions as to how to troubleshoot this? Than

go version unknown?

is not working on the desktop and I am instead getting `go version unknown linux/amd64` instead of a proper version. I've tried reinstalling and and also completely removing and reinstalling `golang`, but it's still the same. Any suggestions as to how to troubleshoot this? Than

Re: Request: Airspy HF+

: I built it in COPR for now and you are welcome to grab it from there and test it: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fuller/test-builds/ Run the following command: sudo dnf copr enable fuller/test-builds && sudo dnf install airspyhf On 18/06/2022 11:29, Buford T. Justice wro

Review swaps

gi?id=2093467 All three spec files were generated automatically and the reviews should be trivial (at least I hope so). Thanks all, fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F

Help with go spec file

naive use case. 2) How should nested folders in cmd/ be built? Here, again, the basic template throws an error since cmd/internal contains no *.go files, only a BUILD.bezel file and a nested cmd directory. Thank you all, fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@sto

Re: Question on creating system users/groups at install in spec file

That did it - thank you very much! On 30/04/2022 23:26, Paweł Marciniak wrote: I think you need %pre -n the same for %preun %post %postun or all systemd macros will not work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Question on creating system users/groups at install in spec file

- using root warning: group usbrelay does not exist - using root ``` I've tried several modifications and looked at the munge package for reference, but I'm still stuck. If anyone is willing to take a look, I would be extremely grateful. Test builds: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/co

Help with packaging golang binary: resolving dependencies

ec is at https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04306641-golang-github-task/task.spec There are three other sources on which it depends, none of which are already packaged for Fedora, so the build log (https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36

I have the following errors: Error: Problem 1: package avogadro-libs-1.2.0-35.fc35.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.2.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libGLEW-2.1.0-10.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package avogadro-libs-1.2.0

Re: ppc64le build failures in the mass rebuild

My spec for cantera currently has an "excludearch" for ppc64le since the rawhide builds were failing - should I drop this allow for the releng tools to automatically find and rebuild it? Thanks 31 Jan 2022 16:47:07 Sérgio Basto : > On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 13:36 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: >> On Mon,

Re: Request assistance getting a package (usbrelay) into Fedora

so we can move off the list. Best, fuller Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 18/01/2022 5:04, Darryl Bond wrote: Mark, Petr's suggestio

Re: Request assistance getting a package (usbrelay) into Fedora

I was having so much fun playing with). Best, Fuller Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 17/01/2022 12:43, Darryl Bond wrote: Hello, I maintain a

Package Review / Sponsorship Request

Good day all, I have just submitted a review request (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037645) for Cantera, a chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport tool suite (https://cantera.org/, https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fuller/Cantera/). As this is my first package, I

Another self-introduction

Hello all and happy (civil) new year. I'm Fuller and I am new to this list since making the switch from stable Fedora to Rawhide about a month ago. I have been Linux-exclusive for nearly 15 years after some first exposure to Debian in the computing labs and made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedo

Re: eclipse-photran builds failed/not included since F32

Am Samstag, dem 26.12.2020 um 22:10 +0100 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: > On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 02:13, Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > I'm not quite sure where else to direct this - I intermittently do > > some > > Fortran work and the Eclipse

eclipse-photran builds failed/not included since F32

ether eclipse-photran is being (intentionally) dropped and alternatives? Thanks all -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. Robensstraße 57 52070 Aachen +49 (0)1577-1848188 +1 401-366-2771 mark.e.ful...@gmail.com mark.e.ful...@gmx.de @mefuller:matrix.org https://mefuller.gith

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

__ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.

Re: dnf Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'

Crikey good luck, hoping it doesn't spoil anyone's weekend. Lee Fuller (via mobile) On 19 Jun 2015 4:56 pm, "Sérgio Basto" wrote: > On Sex, 2015-06-19 at 17:49 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 19.06.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Sérgio Basto: > >

Re: dnf Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'

I have actually seen this happening for two days now, I don't have any output to hand but a "dnf update" seems to intermittently hang for a long time and eventually fail. Lee Fuller (via mobile) On 19 Jun 2015 3:53 pm, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > > > Am 19.06.20