Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Mon, 27 May 2013, Adam Williamson wrote: What freeze are you referring to? I believe the Beta freeze has now been lifted, and Final freeze will not hit until 06-18. I think you could happily submit libreswan-3.3-1.fc19 to updates-testing and eventually to stable right now with no special perm

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 12:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:19:43 > > From: Bill Nottingham > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Subject: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Dom, 2013-05-26 at 12:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:19:43 > > From: Bill Nottingham > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Subject: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Bill Nottingham wrote: Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:19:43 From: Bill Nottingham To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Dan Mashal wrote: >> Looking at updating to libnotify 0.80 as well. > > The latest upstream[1] is 0.7.5. Where is this 0.80? > > [1] https://git.gnome.org/browse/libnotify > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

Dan Mashal wrote: > Looking at updating to libnotify 0.80 as well. The latest upstream[1] is 0.7.5. Where is this 0.80? [1] https://git.gnome.org/browse/libnotify -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: >> No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I >> don't immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really >> any other Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and used to >>

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

Adam Williamson wrote: > No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I > don't immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really > any other Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and used to > own it for my aborted plan to try and package Unity, and it

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On 03/07/2013 05:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Eh. Given that Canonical now appear to be building Ubuntu OS, I have very little interest in trying to package Unity any more. I don't think it would make sense to package any of the bits individually unless you buy into their whole roadmap which in

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 04:44 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > Well, I'm the maintainer of bamf-qt, same reason as Adam's - > my try to package Unity-2d before they decided to get rid of > QML based one and now, finally, decided to go back to the QML > path ;-). So we will see if we could continue w

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

Dne 7.3.2013 14:10, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a): On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:50:59AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:20:22PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package rubygem-acts-as-list (orphan) I've taken this one. Anybody want to co-maintain? Package spicebird (orphan

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:50:59AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:20:22PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Package rubygem-acts-as-list (orphan) > > I've taken this one. Anybody want to co-maintain? > > > Package spicebird (orphan) Second thought, I've decided again

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:20:22PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package rubygem-acts-as-list (orphan) I've taken this one. Anybody want to co-maintain? > Package spicebird (orphan) -- Darryl L. Pierce http://mcpierce.multiply.com/ "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?" pgptvdt

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

- Original Message - > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > > >> Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream? > > > > > > No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I > > don't > > immediately

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream? >> > > No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't > immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or rea

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream? > > > No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't > immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or reall

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream? No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really any other Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

- Original Message - > > Gnome maintainers: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/polkit-gnome > > Complete orphan. Please add yourselves (halfline, mclasen, ajax, > mcann, whoever is interested) We don't need polkit-gnome anymore, gnome-shell has its own polkit agent bu

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:26:13 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Would be good if emacs-rpm-spec-mode could be kept. > Taking it over. Great! Thanks. -- Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.9.0-0.rc0.git15.1.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.31 0.21 0.24 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently >> orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17. >> >> The following packages are curren

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17. > > The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If > you have a need for

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/03/13 18:32, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:45:12 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > >> On 05/03/13 01:20, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >>> Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan) >> That's a curious package, it lasted a few mo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:45:12 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On 05/03/13 01:20, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan) > That's a curious package, it lasted a few months, was never branched, > and then is gone. And rpm-spec-mode.el has been provided by > emacs-co

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/03/13 01:20, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan) That's a curious package, it lasted a few months, was never branched, and then is gone. And rpm-spec-mode.el has been provided by emacs-common for as long as I could reme

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On 4 March 2013 18:20, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17. > > The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If > you have a need for one of the

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package sympy (orphan) I have taken ownership of sympy. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any o

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package openswan (orphan) Openswan is going to be obsoleted by libreswan. So it should be removed/dead packaged. I am waiting for libreswan 3.1 to package it up for review into Fedora and RHEL. Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:02:08PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >I applied for co-maintainer status. > I took ownership in f17, f18 and f19. If you want to be owner in the > future just let me know. Sounds good. Thanks! -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:25:35 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:46:36 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42:35AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I can provide a little help. Like, volunteering to be the main package owner at least throuhg F19?

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On 24 February 2013 10:19, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17. > > The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If > you have a need for one of

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

spe taken. -J -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:46:36 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42:35AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>I can provide a little help. >Like, volunteering to be the main package owner at least throuhg F19? :) As long as we aren't planning to do a major version update be

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42:35AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >>I can provide a little help. > >Like, volunteering to be the main package owner at least throuhg F19? :) > As long as we aren't planning to do a major version update before > F19 releases. I can handle minor changes. There are onl

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Dan Mashal" >> I have taken ownership of the following packages: >> >> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme, >> dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media, >> gtk-

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

- Original Message - > From: "Dan Mashal" > I have taken ownership of the following packages: > > gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme, > dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media, > gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 02/24/2013 08:43 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> I have taken ownership of the following packages: gnome-icon-theme, gnome-background

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

Hi, On 02/24/2013 11:19 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package celt071 (orphan) I picked up celt071 (used by mumble). > Package dbus-sharp (orphan) > comaintained by: chkr I took dbus-sharp, too. Regards, Christian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapr

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On 02/24/2013 08:43 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> >> - Original Message - >> >>> I have taken ownership of the following packages: >>> >>> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme, >>> dbus-python, gpointing-dev

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 12:35 +0100, drago01 wrote: > > uses something different, XFCE has its own, > >> gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it > could > >> probably switch to one of the alternatives? > > > > Looking over guake, I believe it just requires *a* notification >

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

Le dimanche 24 février 2013 11:19:43, Bill Nottingham a écrit : > Package sdcc (orphan) > Removing: sdcc > ktechlab requires sdcc = 3.2.0-0.fc18 > mcu8051ide requires sdcc = 3.2.0-0.fc18 I have pickep up sddc, comainteners welcome! Regards, Alain -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Martin Sourada (martin.sour...@gmail.com) said: >> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100 >> Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >> > Removing: notification-daemon >> > clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 >> > gnome-session r

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/02/13 17:19, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package stow (orphan) comaintained by: salimma Unretired, thanks for the heads-up. The package is still up-to-date and the mass rebuild went fine. Regards, - -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contri

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

Martin Sourada (martin.sour...@gmail.com) said: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100 > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Removing: notification-daemon > > clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 > > gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 > > guake require

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Martin Sourada wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100 > Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> Removing: notification-daemon >> clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 >> gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 >> guake requi

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > - Original Message - > >> I have taken ownership of the following packages: >> >> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme, >> dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media, >> gtk-solidity-settings

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On 02/24/2013 08:28 AM, Martin Sourada wrote: On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100 Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: notification-daemon clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 guake requires notification-daemo

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

- Original Message - > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:04:36 -0500, >Matthew Miller wrote: > >On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:38:30AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >> >Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep > >> >it limping > >> >along until the next release and maybe

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

- Original Message - > I have taken ownership of the following packages: > > gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme, > dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media, > gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking > ConsoleKit and cpp

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:04:36 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:38:30AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep it limping >along until the next release and maybe make updating it a feature for F20? I can provide

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100 Bill Nottingham wrote: > Removing: notification-daemon > clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 > gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 > guake requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19 > notification-daemon-

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:38:30AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep it limping > >along until the next release and maybe make updating it a feature for F20? > I can provide a little help. Like, volunteering to be the main package owne

Re: festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 05:36:00 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package festival (orphan) I put a lot of work into this package years ago, and would like to work on it again, but it's big and a little scary and I reellly nee

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On 02/24/2013 11:19 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package orca (orphan) I have picked up orca. -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

On 24/02/13 11:19, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package postgresql_autodoc (fails to build) I just requested commit rights for postgresql_autodoc. If Devrim doesn't like to, I'd take care of it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845688 Volker Fröhlich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

festival [was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package festival (orphan) I put a lot of work into this package years ago, and would like to work on it again, but it's big and a little scary and I reellly need to not commit to more things right now. There's been (somewhat