Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-04-06 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, 20 Feb, 2013 at 16:21:26 GMT, Tom Tromey wrote: FWIW we're adding direct support for this to gdb. You'll be able to supply backtrace filters with your project just as you currently can provide value and type pretty-printers. Are there docs for this anywhere? --Ben -- devel mailing

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-22 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 22:41 +, Ian Malone wrote: On 21 February 2013 18:24, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:04 +, Ian Malone wrote: On 19 February 2013 12:13, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: Question: does a python segfault from a

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-21 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 02/20/2013 05:21 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: David == David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes: David In particular, for scripting languages, David it's most useful to be able to extract the script-level backtrace from David the C-level stack (i.e. what was the Python code doing?) FWIW we're

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-21 Thread Tom Tromey
David In particular, for scripting languages, David it's most useful to be able to extract the script-level backtrace from David the C-level stack (i.e. what was the Python code doing?) Tom FWIW we're adding direct support for this to gdb. Tom You'll be able to supply backtrace filters with your

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-21 Thread Ian Malone
On 21 February 2013 18:24, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:04 +, Ian Malone wrote: On 19 February 2013 12:13, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: Question: does a python segfault from a broken script indicate a python bug as well? The scripting

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-20 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
Thank you Dave! That's exactly the kind of ideas I was looking for. Just a short summary what we can do on the server (now) to get this brainstorm going: - it has all the rpm debuginfo packages, so getting the symbol names or lines is not a problem (actually we do that even now) - it can

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-20 Thread Michael Stahl
On 20/02/13 09:40, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: One thing we're struggling with now is the normalization of stacktraces which means deciding which functions are important and which are not. e.g. for kernel there are stacktraces with a lot of warn_* functions and only a few functions are different

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-20 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 02/20/2013 03:04 AM, Ian Malone wrote: Question: does a python segfault from a broken script indicate a python bug as well? The scripting engine shouldn't really be crashing. Of course--I'd argue such thing is really a blessing in disguise and the offending script should be added to the

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-20 Thread Tom Tromey
David == David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes: David In particular, for scripting languages, David it's most useful to be able to extract the script-level backtrace from David the C-level stack (i.e. what was the Python code doing?) FWIW we're adding direct support for this to gdb. You'll

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the component back to where the bug really is, but it currently requires some manual intervention: http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/dmalcolm/public_git/triage.git

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-19 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 11:43 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the component back to where the bug really is, but it currently requires some manual intervention:

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On 19/02/13 10:38 AM, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 11:43 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the component back to where the bug really is, but it

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-19 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 02/19/2013 10:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On 19/02/13 10:38 AM, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 11:43 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the component

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:10:38PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: So if you want to hack this into a tool for use on kernel bugs, go for it. ...and please integrate with abrt! Let's have it all working together :) - I am all for it, the abrt server is exactly the place where these kind