Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-21 Thread Bill Nottingham
Ravindra Kumar (ravindraku...@vmware.com) said: > Thanks Bill. No issues with the checkin. > > I looked at the checked in files and I have following questions: > > 1. "false" and "false" >elements will make these packages not to be installed by default >and invisible to users. Then, how

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:05 -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote: > > Well, if comps groups can't subsume other comps groups, that rather > > seems to suck. The 'have these groups included in @standard and @base-x' > > approach seemed by quite a long margin the best one; the alternatives > > all seem to suc

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-20 Thread Ravindra Kumar
> Well, if comps groups can't subsume other comps groups, that rather > seems to suck. The 'have these groups included in @standard and @base-x' > approach seemed by quite a long margin the best one; the alternatives > all seem to suck. In the current situation, the closest we could get is directl

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 16:47 -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote: > > I thought the intent was to have the groups themselves included in other > > groups; virt-agents in 'standard' and 'virt-agents-x' in 'base-x'. They > > would then be installed by default in most configurations, but could be > > specifica

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-20 Thread Ravindra Kumar
> I thought the intent was to have the groups themselves included in other > groups; virt-agents in 'standard' and 'virt-agents-x' in 'base-x'. They > would then be installed by default in most configurations, but could be > specifically left out via a kickstart if desired, and would not be in > mi

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 14:38 -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote: > Thanks Bill. No issues with the checkin. > > I looked at the checked in files and I have following questions: > > 1. "false" and "false" >elements will make these packages not to be installed by default >and invisible to users. Th

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-20 Thread Ravindra Kumar
doraproject.org Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:48:47 PM Subject: Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in Ravindra Kumar (ravindraku...@vmware.com) said: > Please let me know when can I checkin this change. Oops, my apologies. I got the OK from the translation list, so I checked in the chan

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
ject.org > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:51:45 PM > Subject: Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in > > Ravindra Kumar (ravindraku...@vmware.com) said: > > > The two added group are OK. grouplist is not something that actually is > > > used, though; they would

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-20 Thread Ravindra Kumar
vindra - Original Message - From: "Bill Nottingham" To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" Cc: tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:51:45 PM Subject: Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in Ravindra Kumar (ravindraku...@vmware.com) said: >

Fwd: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-17 Thread Ravindra Kumar
Including mailing list for wider/more inputs. >> I'm thinking of another approach. How about adding "open-vm-tools" >> to "standard" group and "open-vm-tools-desktop" to "base-x" group? >> Then, I will not have to modify so many installation environments >> (patches attached). In future, we could

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-14 Thread Bill Nottingham
Ravindra Kumar (ravindraku...@vmware.com) said: > I would appreciate if you could let me know a way to test comps file > changes. 1) Make a new .xml file Run 'make comps-f19.xml' in a git checkout. 2) Create a new repository using that comps file createrepo -g your-new-comps-f19.xml /some/path

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-14 Thread Bill Nottingham
Ravindra Kumar (ravindraku...@vmware.com) said: > > The two added group are OK. grouplist is not something that actually is > > used, though; they would need to either be added as mandatory/optional > > groups to the desktop environments, or just brought in via the spins' > > kickstart files. > >

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-12 Thread Ravindra Kumar
> The two added group are OK. grouplist is not something that actually is > used, though; they would need to either be added as mandatory/optional > groups to the desktop environments, or just brought in via the spins' > kickstart files. > Also, please attach patches - your mailer appears to have

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
Ravindra Kumar (ravindraku...@vmware.com) said: > Hi Bill and others, > > Based on the earlier discussions in the emails, I have following diff for > comps-f19.xml.in: > > --- comps-f19.xml.in 2013-04-29 17:41:10.003026000 -0700 > +++ comps-f19.xml.in.new 2013-05-08 20:35:57.000112000 -0700

Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-08 Thread Ravindra Kumar
Hi Bill and others, Based on the earlier discussions in the emails, I have following diff for comps-f19.xml.in: --- comps-f19.xml.in 2013-04-29 17:41:10.003026000 -0700 +++ comps-f19.xml.in.new 2013-05-08 20:35:57.000112000 -0700 @@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ <_description>Local X.org display server fal