On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 9:56 AM Chris Kelley wrote:
>
> As a purely logical expression, this simplifies to "GPL-2.0-or-later AND
> LGPL-2.1-or-later". Is that sort of simplification not allowed?
The short answer is, these are not truly logical expressions and
therefore they shouldn't necessarily
How fun! Thanks for the links and explanation.
On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 16:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 05. 23 16:28, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > Chris Kelley wrote on 2023/05/05 22:55:
> >> As a purely logical expression, this simplifies to "GPL-2.0-or-later AND
> >> LGPL-2.1-or-later". Is that
On 05. 05. 23 16:28, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Chris Kelley wrote on 2023/05/05 22:55:
As a purely logical expression, this simplifies to "GPL-2.0-or-later AND
LGPL-2.1-or-later". Is that sort of simplification not allowed?
This is no longer allowed:
Chris Kelley wrote on 2023/05/05 22:55:
As a purely logical expression, this simplifies to "GPL-2.0-or-later AND
LGPL-2.1-or-later". Is that sort of simplification not allowed?
This is no longer allowed:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_license_analysis
As a purely logical expression, this simplifies to "GPL-2.0-or-later AND
LGPL-2.1-or-later". Is that sort of simplification not allowed?
On Fri, 5 May 2023, 13:20 Miro Hrončok, wrote:
> python-rpm-generators License tag changes from GPLv2+ to:
>
> GPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.1-or-later AND
>
python-rpm-generators License tag changes from GPLv2+ to:
GPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.1-or-later AND (LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain OR
LGPL-2.1-or-later OR GPL-2.0-or-later)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-generators/pull-request/67
Funny thing is that the
