On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:25:15AM -0600, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submitted a scratch build of Swift to Koji for EPEL 8 and it pretty much
> immediately failed, and looking at root.log I found:
>
> DEBUG util.py:443: error: line 71: Unknown tag: %dnl Source31:
> https://github.c
Hi all,
I submitted a scratch build of Swift to Koji for EPEL 8 and it pretty much
immediately failed, and looking at root.log I found:
DEBUG util.py:443: error: line 71: Unknown tag: %dnl Source31:
https://github.com/apple/swift-format/archive/swift-5.8-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2023-02-20-a
everything.
> Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
> > with the maintainers of the packages. I've had a few packages where
> > I'm the only mainta
l(a):
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
> with the maintainers of the packages. I've had a few packages where
> I'm the only maintainer and I've explicitly not built them for EPEL-8
> for reasons yet people are now
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:23:11 -0500
> Message-ID:
> sjrbn+...@mail.gmail.com>
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 05:13, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
> > with the maintainers of the packages. I
On 07. 11. 19 18:28, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:48:41PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:36 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
wit
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 12:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:48:41PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:36 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > > > I'd li
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:48:41PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:36 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > > I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
> > >
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:36 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
> > with the maintainers of the packages.
>
> Because they can?
> Nothing in guid
On 07. 11. 19 17:35, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
with the maintainers of the packages.
Because they can?
Nothing in guidelines say: "you have to contact maintainer of
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:36 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
> > with the maintainers of the packages.
>
> Because they can?
> Nothing in guid
Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
with the maintainers of the packages.
Because they can?
Nothing in guidelines say: "you have to contact maintainer of different branch when
you request new one&qu
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 05:13, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
> with the maintainers of the packages. I've had a few packages where
> I'm the only maintainer and I've explicitly not b
Hi,
I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
with the maintainers of the packages. I've had a few packages where
I'm the only maintainer and I've explicitly not built them for EPEL-8
for reasons yet people are now coming without any engagem
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 5:58 PM Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>
> > These bugs exist in RHEL 8 as well as CentOS 8 based environments. Why do
> > you think that modularity will *ever* work this way?
>
> I don't know whether this question was aimed directly to me, but if so
> ... I am sorry, I can't help y
> These bugs exist in RHEL 8 as well as CentOS 8 based environments. Why do you
> think that modularity will *ever* work this way?
I don't know whether this question was aimed directly to me, but if so
... I am sorry, I can't help you here. You will probably need to
talk directly to the modularit
Shame on Redhat for using an untested feature
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671683
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:/
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> currently, there is a problem with building EPEL-8 packages because of
> DNF bugs regarding modularity (see RHBZ 1758459).
>
> The only known workaround is to use DNF with `best=False'. Even though
> it is something you don't
Hello,
currently, there is a problem with building EPEL-8 packages because of
DNF bugs regarding modularity (see RHBZ 1758459).
The only known workaround is to use DNF with `best=False'. Even though
it is something you don't really want to use longterm, we are patching
mock configs epel-8-* chroo
19 matches
Mail list logo
