James Antill wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 15:52 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> > I've just realized that I had a list of all packages/versions
>> > that were installed as of a few weeks ago (April 5).
>> > In case it helps:
>> >
>>
>> Yah - the histo
Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
> IMHO, one should always be able to run "yum -y update" without fear
> of such damage. Maybe that's naive, but with the exception of
> yesterday's run, it's worked for me for more than two years of
> rawhide and F10..F13.
In x86_64 F13 and Rawhide, often depe
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 15:52 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> > I've just realized that I had a list of all packages/versions
> > that were installed as of a few weeks ago (April 5).
> > In case it helps:
> >
>
> Yah - the history sqlite file you uploaded
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've just realized that I had a list of all packages/versions
> that were installed as of a few weeks ago (April 5).
> In case it helps:
>
Yah - the history sqlite file you uploaded has all that info in there (in
a round about way) but the problem sti
Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Seth Vidal wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
>> BZ-attached here:
>>
>> http://bug
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Seth Vidal wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Frank Murphy wrote:
On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
> BZ-attached here:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
>
Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
BZ-attached here:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
>>>
>>> Read up on:
>>> yum-plugin-protect-packages
>>
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
>>> BZ-attached here:
>>>
>>> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
>>
>> Read up on:
>> yum-plugin-protect-packages
>>
>> if your going on autop
Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
>> BZ-attached here:
>>
>> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
>
> Read up on:
> yum-plugin-protect-packages
>
> if your going on autopilot.
Thanks. Installed.
IMHO, one should always be ab
On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
> BZ-attached here:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
Read up on:
yum-plugin-protect-packages
if your going on autopilot.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86 64-32 Hybrid
--
devel mai
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> Run "echo 'n' | yum --skip-broken update"
>
> for me and save the output.
It's really unexciting output.
Output below:
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running tran
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 21:09 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I started the "yum -y update"
Well there's your problem. Only half kidding, but yum -y is quite
dangerous, as it will happily do things like "yum -y remove glibc".
That said, it shouldn't have removed things in order to process the
update,
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I hope it's just me...
>> but I was very dismayed to find that today's F13 update (which pulled
>> in a lot of changes) hosed my laptop.
>
> I have two 64bit F13 laptops... fully updated with upd
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I hope it's just me...
> but I was very dismayed to find that today's F13 update (which pulled
> in a lot of changes) hosed my laptop.
I have two 64bit F13 laptops... fully updated with updates-testing
except for gnome-icon-theme-extras whic
Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> I hope it's just me...
>> but I was very dismayed to find that today's F13 update (which pulled
>> in a lot of changes) hosed my laptop. It removed almost everything
>> from /boot, and removed or emptied /sbin, /bin, /usr/sbin and
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I hope it's just me...
> but I was very dismayed to find that today's F13 update (which pulled
> in a lot of changes) hosed my laptop. It removed almost everything
> from /boot, and removed or emptied /sbin, /bin, /usr/sbin and /usr/bin.
> It removed n
16 matches
Mail list logo
