- Original Message -
> From: "Farkas Levente"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 11:23:18 AM
> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
>
> is this version of eclipse be ported to rhel dev tools
ment discussions related to
>> Fedora"
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:41:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
>>
>> I'm not proposing having OpenJDK7 in Fedora 21. What I'm asking for is to
>> have them both for a month o
team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Deepak Bhole" , "Development discussions related to
> Fedora"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:41:30 PM
> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
>
> I'm not proposing h
Hi,
* Stephen John Smoogen [2014-03-26 11:55]:
> I would say that there needs to be something a bit larger than a
> rebuild but a mass test so that you end up with finding out that someone's
> hack
> to make java-7 do something neat isn't java-8 runtime saying 'crash'.
What about holding a Test
On Wed 26 Mar 2014 01:19:52 PM CET Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:59:13PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
>> I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
>> necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it
>> stands, it's difficult to use a modern
On 03/26/2014 05:52 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Wed 26 Mar 2014 05:29:55 PM CET Christopher wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>>> * Christopher [2014-03-25 19:59]:
I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
necessarily as the def
On Wed 26 Mar 2014 05:29:55 PM CET Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>> * Christopher [2014-03-25 19:59]:
>>> I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
>>> necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it
>>> stands,
- Original Message -
> From: "Christopher"
> To: "Deepak Bhole" , "Development discussions related to
> Fedora"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:29:55 PM
> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:3
On 26 March 2014 10:29, Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Christopher [2014-03-25 19:59]:
> >> I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
> >> necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it
> >> stands, it's
; Alexander Kurtakov
>> > Red Hat Eclipse team
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -
>> >> From: "Omair Majid"
>> >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>> >>
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 20
On 26 March 2014 07:41, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 03/25/2014 06:45 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
> > * Mikolaj Izdebski [2014-03-24 11:41]:
> >> On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >>> Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says "80%
> build
> >>> failure rate" withou
ot;Deepak Bhole"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:31:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
> >
> > * Christopher [2014-03-25 19:59]:
> > > I also would like t
On 03/25/2014 08:07 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
> * Mikolaj Izdebski [2014-03-24 11:55]:
>> Blocking java-1.7.0-oepnjdk may also be required. This
>> makes it impossible to scratch-build Java packages using f21-build
>> target in current state.
>
> Is there anything I can/should do here
On 03/25/2014 06:45 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
> * Mikolaj Izdebski [2014-03-24 11:41]:
>> On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says "80% build
>>> failure rate" without saying that all are JavaDoc-related), we really
>>> should d
ot;
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:31:59 PM
> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
>
> * Christopher [2014-03-25 19:59]:
> > I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
> > necessa
Kurtakov
> > Red Hat Eclipse team
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Omair Majid"
> >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:07:39 PM
> >> Subject: Re: F21 S
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:59:13PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
> necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it
> stands, it's difficult to use a modern Fedora on projects that are
> still developing against JDK 1.6
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Christopher wrote:
> I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
> necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it
> stands, it's difficult to use a modern Fedora on projects that are
> still developing against JDK 1.6.
+1.
uot;Omair Majid"
>> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:07:39 PM
>> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
>>
>> * Mikolaj Izdebski [2014-03-24 11:55]:
>> > That's exactly the p
t; Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:07:39 PM
> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
>
> * Mikolaj Izdebski [2014-03-24 11:55]:
> > That's exactly the problem. We need to use a modified version of
> > java-1.8.0-openjdk with extra provides and adjusted priorities
* Mikolaj Izdebski [2014-03-24 11:55]:
> That's exactly the problem. We need to use a modified version of
> java-1.8.0-openjdk with extra provides and adjusted priorities for
> alternatives.
I have started a new java-1.8.0-openjdk build that should fix this:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/bu
* Mikolaj Izdebski [2014-03-24 11:41]:
> On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says "80% build
> > failure rate" without saying that all are JavaDoc-related), we really
> > should do a mass rebuild to identify which packages fa
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says "80% build
>> failure rate" without saying that all are JavaDoc-related), we really
>> should do a mass rebuild to identify wh
On 03/24/2014 04:49 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says "80% build
>>> failure rate" without saying that all are JavaDoc-related), w
On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says "80% build
> failure rate" without saying that all are JavaDoc-related), we really
> should do a mass rebuild to identify which packages fail to build *and* to
> file bugs soonish, instea
2014-03-21 13:11 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik :
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Java 8 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> OpenJDK8 is much more strict when it comes to building javadocs. Many -
> javadoc package in Fedora fail to build. Those that
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:24:05 -0400 (EDT)
Omair Majid wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Horák"
> > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > Make Java 8 (provided by OpenJDK 8 which is java-1.8.0-openjdk)
> > > the default Java runtime. The current default Java runtime (Java
> > > 7, p
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Horák"
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Make Java 8 (provided by OpenJDK 8 which is java-1.8.0-openjdk) the
> > default Java runtime. The current default Java runtime (Java 7,
> > provided by OpenJDK 7, java-1.7.0-openjdk) will be obsoleted and
> > removed.
- Original Message -
> Is there an easy way to do test builds against 8 now?
java-1.8.0-openjdk is available in F19 (updates-testing), F20 (updates-testing)
and in rawhide.
It doesn't provide 'java-devel' (which is what yum uses to find JDKs), so Koji
shouldn't use java-1.8.0-openjdk
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 13:11:44 +0100,
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Java 8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8
It may be a good idea to mass rebuild Java packages against OpenJDK 8 to spot
any source incompatibilities earlier. This is not required.
Is th
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:11:44 +0100
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Java 8 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8
>
> Change owner(s): Omair Majid
>
> Make Java 8 (provided by OpenJDK 8 which is java-1.8.0-openjdk) the
> default Java runtime. The current defaul
= Proposed System Wide Change: Java 8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8
Change owner(s): Omair Majid
Make Java 8 (provided by OpenJDK 8 which is java-1.8.0-openjdk) the default
Java runtime. The current default Java runtime (Java 7, provided by OpenJDK 7,
java-1.7.0-openjdk) will
32 matches
Mail list logo
