Kevin Kofler via devel writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> The ostensible reason for this is that you cannot be tracked by your fixed
> MAC across different APs.
But different APs will typically be operated by different people, who have
no access to each other's MAC address logs anyway. So what is
Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
>
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/blob/main/src/libnm-core-impl/nm-setting-wireless.c#L1598
So NM supports both, which leaves the question: Is the proposal to default
to "stable-ssid" (or to "stable" with the stable-ID set to the SSID)
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> The ostensible reason for this is that you cannot be tracked by your fixed
> MAC across different APs.
But different APs will typically be operated by different people, who have
no access to each other's MAC address logs anyway. So what is the point of
sending them a dif
Am 24.12.23 um 15:03 schrieb Robert Nichols:
On 12/23/23 16:40, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Christopher Klooz writes:
Btw, does anyone know if this (in the practically-same manner) is
really already introduced in Windows, Mac, Android by default?
Globally? This
Most recent Android phones, and iP
On 12/23/23 16:40, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Christopher Klooz writes:
Btw, does anyone know if this (in the practically-same manner) is really
already introduced in Windows, Mac, Android by default? Globally? This
Most recent Android phones, and iPhones do this by default.
What they do is pin
MAC randomization if they are affected negatively could be a
good mitigation without increasing the stuff in the installer.
[1]
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-wifi-mac-randomization-system-wide/99856/22
On 24/12/2023 11.19, Christopher Klooz wrote:
On 24/12/2023
ce the issue on all systems
roughly at the same time... That might serve as a small but existing
mitigation.
[1]
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-wifi-mac-randomization-system-wide/99856/15
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@
Kevin Kofler via devel writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Christopher Klooz writes:
>
>> Btw, does anyone know if this (in the practically-same manner) is really
>> already introduced in Windows, Mac, Android by default? Globally? This
>
> Most recent Android phones, and iPhones do this by defaul
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Christopher Klooz writes:
>
>> Btw, does anyone know if this (in the practically-same manner) is really
>> already introduced in Windows, Mac, Android by default? Globally? This
>
> Most recent Android phones, and iPhones do this by default.
>
> What they do is pin each
Christopher Klooz writes:
Btw, does anyone know if this (in the practically-same manner) is really
already introduced in Windows, Mac, Android by default? Globally? This
Most recent Android phones, and iPhones do this by default.
What they do is pin each randomized MAC address per AP. They'r
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 8:28 PM Christopher Klooz wrote:
> Btw, does anyone know if this (in the practically-same manner) is really
> already introduced in Windows, Mac, Android by default?
There is a draft RFC for randomizing MAC addresses
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-madinas-m
ups, especially for users without sophisticated
knowledge of the technical background ->
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-wifi-mac-randomization-system-wide/99856
Btw, does anyone know if this (in the practically-same manner) is really
already introduced in Windows, Mac, A
Hi,
On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 16:08 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 2:49 PM Tom Hughes via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > > On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott
> > > >
> > > > wro
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 2:49 PM Tom Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will
>
On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott
wrote:
I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will
cause issues for users using router mac filtering.
What this seems to state is that t
On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause
issues for users using router mac filtering.
What this seems to state is that the MAC address would be unique for
each SSID,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause
> issues for users using router mac filtering.
What this seems to state is that the MAC address would be unique for
each SSID, but once it's picked, it would be lock
I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause
issues for users using router mac filtering.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WifiMACRandomization
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Stee
19 matches
Mail list logo
