On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:46:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 16:19 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
> > > From what I can tell, it looks like the -90 update got 'auto-pushed' by
> > > hitting +3 karma, despite the fact that two people had reported the
> > > regression in Bo
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 16:19 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > From what I can tell, it looks like the -90 update got 'auto-pushed' by
> > hitting +3 karma, despite the fact that two people had reported the
> > regression in Bodhi. This is a classic case of 'works for me' positive
> > feedback overrid
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 10:28 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 10:48:39PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>>
>> > since the last stable kernel update in Fedora 12, a lot of Dell machines
>> > do not boot anymore due to a k
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 10:28 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 10:48:39PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> > since the last stable kernel update in Fedora 12, a lot of Dell machines
> > do not boot anymore due to a kernel oops... Of course bugzilla has a
> > couple of bug re
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 10:48:39PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> since the last stable kernel update in Fedora 12, a lot of Dell machines
> do not boot anymore due to a kernel oops... Of course bugzilla has a
> couple of bug reports (e.g. #578217, #579118, #578663, #578590).
>
> There is a know
Hi *,
since the last stable kernel update in Fedora 12, a lot of Dell machines
do not boot anymore due to a kernel oops... Of course bugzilla has a
couple of bug reports (e.g. #578217, #579118, #578663, #578590).
There is a known fix/workaround which is already present in CVS
(kernel-2.6.32.10
