Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-04-01 Thread Ian Malone
On 1 April 2014 02:50, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/31/2014 8:37 PM, Corey Sheldon wrote: Whatever if they can't learn the basics and the fundamental basis of Linux or the Patent issues and what have you then go somewhere else like to mac or windows..sometimes you need to work for

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-04-01 Thread Corey Sheldon
power needs to come with responsibility and understanding Corey W Sheldon Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine 310.909.7672 www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:50 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/31/2014 8:37 PM, Corey Sheldon wrote: Whatever if they can't learn

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-03-31 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/30/2014 11:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:11:58PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: I promised a while ago that I would provide a text

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-03-31 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/30/2014 11:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:11:58PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: I promised a

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-03-31 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 03/31/2014 12:38 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: Workstation will require this too. Having it be in Base is a good idea. If there emerges a WG that does not require this from WG then what and was not base limiting itself to it's already defined package set? JBG -- devel mailing list

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-03-31 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - On 03/31/2014 12:38 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: Workstation will require this too. Having it be in Base is a good idea. If there emerges a WG that does not require this from WG then what and was not base limiting itself to it's already defined package set? Base is

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-03-31 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 03/31/2014 01:00 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: Base is common platform for products but it does not mean everything has to be used by other products or everything has to follow base path (for example installer is part of Base as we agreed but it can diverge a lot over products, and even it

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-03-31 Thread Miloslav Trmač
2014-03-31 15:29 GMT+02:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: You do realize that the size of the base needs to be bound to the lowest common denominator between current and future multiple products to make it this kind of proposal work now and in the future right? We are at liberty to

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-03-31 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 03/31/2014 01:46 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: Sure, such choices to simplify our environment at the cost of Base size would disqualify us from the smallest distribution for embedded use, but we have never really been in that race anyway I hardly call it simplification shifting workload and

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-03-31 Thread Corey Sheldon
As I've til recently been a whimsical just install whatever a package needs but am now beginning to look more granularly at this could someone either briefly explain differences in main sources etc or link me to a good write-up to this effect?? much appreciated and while it hasn't been the

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-03-31 Thread Corey Sheldon
Whatever if they can't learn the basics and the fundamental basis of Linux or the Patent issues and what have you then go somewhere else like to mac or windows..sometimes you need to work for things and teaching a man to fish is always better and personally while i think at first you may be

Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, What's Happening?)

2014-03-31 Thread David
On 3/31/2014 8:37 PM, Corey Sheldon wrote: Whatever if they can't learn the basics and the fundamental basis of Linux or the Patent issues and what have you then go somewhere else like to mac or windows..sometimes you need to work for things and teaching a man to fish is always better and