On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 13:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 12:10, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 17:59, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > > On 20/01/2024 16:07, Jerry James wrote:
> > >
> > > > Upstream has this in
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 12:10, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 17:59, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > On 20/01/2024 16:07, Jerry James wrote:
> >
> > > Upstream has this in src/tbb/CMakeLists.txt:
> > >
> > > if (CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8)
> > >
On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 17:59, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> On 20/01/2024 16:07, Jerry James wrote:
>
> > Upstream has this in src/tbb/CMakeLists.txt:
> >
> > if (CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8)
> > set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb)
> > else()
> > set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb32)
> > endif()
> >
> >
On 20/01/2024 16:07, Jerry James wrote:
Upstream has this in src/tbb/CMakeLists.txt:
if (CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8)
set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb)
else()
set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb32)
endif()
That makes the pkgconfig file install as tbb32.pc. I don't know why
upstream is doing that. Maybe so
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 8:32 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Aha, thanks for figuring that out! The problem was also observed at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036372#c43 but I didn't
> get the right explanation.
>
> I'm not sure why the i686 package does that, maybe Jerry knows (I
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 at 15:10, Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> It looks like openvdb-devel manages to accidentally depend on the tbb compat
> package on i686 only, which breaks OpenImageIO because OpenImageIO depends on
> the updated tbb, and that conflicts with the compat package:
>
> Problem: package
It looks like openvdb-devel manages to accidentally depend on the tbb
compat package on i686 only, which breaks OpenImageIO because
OpenImageIO depends on the updated tbb, and that conflicts with the
compat package:
Problem: package tbb2020.3-devel-2020.3-3.fc40.i686 conflicts with tbb-devel
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 01:27, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 00:21 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:10, Jonathan Wakely
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'll be building boost, tbb, and
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 22:15:18 +
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> > the f40-build-side-81691
> > side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 00:21 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:10, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them
> > > in
> > > the
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> > the f40-build-side-81691
> > side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> the f40-build-side-81691
> side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
>
> If your package gets a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.83.0" comment,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 22:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> heaptrack
> Could NOT find Libunwind (missing: LIBUNWIND_HAS_UNW_BACKTRACE)
This one's already fixed in dist-git! (thanks, aleasto)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> the f40-build-side-81691
> side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
>
> If your package gets a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.83.0" comment,
I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
the f40-build-side-81691
side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
If your package gets a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.83.0" comment, please
don't rebuild it in rawhide, we're building it in the side
15 matches
Mail list logo
