Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 05. 05. 23 18:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 04. 05. 23 23:58, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:44:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 04. 05. 23 23:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 02:40:41PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello folks, > ...snip... > > > > Would that be possible? > > I don't think it currently is... but sounds like a reasonable RFE to > koji to me. > > The way koji

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-05 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
There is already an ancient similar request upstream with some hints how to achieve that (it was to disable s390 buikders for noarch packages, though): https://pagure.io/koji/issue/2229 Inviato da Proton Mail mobile Messaggio originale Il 5 Mag 2023, 18:19, Kevin Fenzi ha

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 05. 23 23:58, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:44:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 04. 05. 23 23:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > >

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-05 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 05. 23 23:58, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:44:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 04. 05. 23 23:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello folks, ...snip... Would that be possible? I don't think it currently is... but

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:44:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 05. 23 23:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > ...snip... > > > > > > Would that be possible? > > > > I don't think it currently is... but sounds like

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 05. 23 23:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello folks, ...snip... Would that be possible? I don't think it currently is... but sounds like a reasonable RFE to koji to me. The way koji handles noarch packages is that it builds

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello folks, ...snip... > > Would that be possible? I don't think it currently is... but sounds like a reasonable RFE to koji to me. The way koji handles noarch packages is that it builds them on all arches, checks to make sure

How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello folks, Couple months ago, we discussed with @psimovec if it's possible to ExcludeArch i686 from scipy. This Python discussion brought the topic back: https://discuss.python.org/t/dropping-32-bit-packages/5476/9 I've tried to see how many packages would be affected and the short answer

How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello folks, Couple months ago, we discussed with @psimovec if it's possible to ExcludeArch i686 from scipy. This Python discussion brought the topic back: https://discuss.python.org/t/dropping-32-bit-packages/5476/9 I've tried to see how many packages would be affected and the short answer