Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-18 Thread Pavel Alexeev
17.03.2015 02:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:02:25 +0300 > Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have >> worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass >> rebuild? It allow estimate amount of broken packages a

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:02:25 +0300 Pavel Alexeev wrote: > The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have > worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass > rebuild? It allow estimate amount of broken packages and see > dependencies. Do we have resources t

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-16 Thread Pavel Alexeev
15.03.2015 16:57, Michael Schwendt пишет: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:49:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages >> simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite >> complicated. >> >> So far I've hit: >> - GCC-5

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:49:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages > simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite > complicated. > > So far I've hit: > - GCC-5.0 > - "Hardening" > - boost upgrade > - ImageMagi

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/10/2015 01:30 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет: On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 Rich Mattes wrote: There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-10 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > 06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет: > > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 > > Rich Mattes wrote: > > > >> There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to > >> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. >

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-09 Thread Pavel Alexeev
06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 > Rich Mattes wrote: > >> There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to >> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. >> >> There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rath

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 Rich Mattes wrote: > There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to > -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. > > There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rather > than later as rawhide is currently a big

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-06 Thread Rich Mattes
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5 there no > planned mass-rebuild for GCC5. > There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. There shoul

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-06 Thread Pavel Alexeev
Hello. 06.03.2015 16:51, Tomáš Smetana wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100 > Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: >> >>> Hello. >>> >>> ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene onl

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-06 Thread Tomáš Smetana
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. > > > > just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene only in > > > the case something goes wrong. > > F

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > Hello. > > ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. > > just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene only in the > > case > > something goes wrong. > First attempt fails [1] with: > > pfsinimgmagick.opfsoutimgmagick.o: : In

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-06 Thread Tomáš Smetana
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300 Pavel Alexeev wrote: > Hello. > > ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. > pfsinimgmagick.opfsoutimgmagick.o: : InIn functionfunction > ``writeFrames(readFramesint(,int ,char* *char)**)': /builddir/'build:/ > BUILD/builddir/build/BUILD//pfstools-1.8.5/src/filefo

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-06 Thread Pavel Alexeev
Hello. ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. 05.03.2015 15:52, Tomáš Smetana wrote: > On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 02:09:00 +0300 > Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I have long outstanding update of ImageMagick[1] and plan do it in >> rawhide in 1-3 days. > <...> > >> Affected packages needs to be r

ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-04 Thread Pavel Alexeev
Hello. I have long outstanding update of ImageMagick[1] and plan do it in rawhide in 1-3 days. So-name happened libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6 (from ImageMagick-c++ sub-package). Other names did not changed: libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.2, libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.2 Affected packages