On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 11:29 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> Andrew Haley and I just had a chat about this.
>
> We both agree that weaning off the 1.6 dependency is the best long-term
> solution. We essentially want it so that nothing in Fedora needs 1.6.
>
> That said, we will continue to ship 1.6
* Toshio Kuratomi [2011-08-26 11:58]:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:29:33AM -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Haley and I just had a chat about this.
> >
> > We both agree that weaning off the 1.6 dependency is the best long-term
> > solution. We essentially want it so that nothing in Fed
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 03:46:40PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> I think that would have to go to FESCo for approval or at least a
> decision, its a fairly major change to happen post alpha where all
> major changes should have landed already and all major mass rebuilds
> should have been done.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:29:33AM -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> Andrew Haley and I just had a chat about this.
>
> We both agree that weaning off the 1.6 dependency is the best long-term
> solution. We essentially want it so that nothing in Fedora needs 1.6.
>
> That said, we will continue to
* Deepak Bhole [2011-08-26 10:46]:
> * Andy Grimm [2011-08-26 10:18]:
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > > * Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
> > >> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
> > >> > over the Feature and doing all
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>> * Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
>>> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
>>> > over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine with i
* Andy Grimm [2011-08-26 10:18]:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
> >> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
> >> > over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine with it...
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Andy Grimm wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
> >> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
> >> > over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine wi
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
>> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
>> > over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine with it...
>>
>> Please do!
>>
>> The only work I've done (lite
* Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
> > over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine with it...
>
> Please do!
>
> The only work I've done (literally) is on the feature page, but feel
> free let me know
+1
--Marek
On 1 sie 2011, at 15:50, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> I think we should offer both in F16.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10:55 Fri 29 Jul , Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Omair Majid [2011-07-29 10:32]:
> > On 07/25/2011 04:04 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > >* Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]:
> > >>Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> > >>>Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapt
On Monday 01 August 2011 13:49:38 Andrew Haley wrote:
> That's not a Java 7 change, it's a new VM bug. The real cause is that
> optimizations used in an older VM are enabled by default. I still think
> we'll have to ship 6 and 7 in parallel.
As far as I know there are fixes for these bugs in Op
On 08/01/2011 11:28 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>
> I found different warning about Java 7 changes:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/1a0d3986e48a9348/warning_index_corruption_and_crashes_in_apache_lucene_core_apache_solr_with_java_7
That's not a Java 7 change, it's a new VM bug.
On 07/29/2011 04:55 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Omair Majid [2011-07-29 10:32]:
>> On 07/25/2011 04:04 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>>> * Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]:
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted to
* Omair Majid [2011-07-29 10:32]:
> On 07/25/2011 04:04 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]:
> >>Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> >>>Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted to
> >>>allow for more late work to occur however non
On 07/25/2011 04:04 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]:
>> Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
>>> Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted to
>>> allow for more late work to occur however none of that talk has turned into
>>> anythi
* Marek Goldmann [2011-07-28 10:41]:
>
> On 25 lip 2011, at 17:30, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> >>> I created an unfinished, skeletal feature page here:
> >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Java7
> >>> Unfortunately, I don't have the knowledge to help build it. I'm
> >>> announcing it here in
On 25 lip 2011, at 17:30, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>>> I created an unfinished, skeletal feature page here:
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Java7
>>> Unfortunately, I don't have the knowledge to help build it. I'm
>>> announcing it here in case whoever maintains Java 6 in Fedora, or
>>> som
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 00:05 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > as I always point out when this comes up, in the hopes that it'll
> > eventually irritate someone enough that they go fix the feature process,
> > the option is open to simply put Java 7 in without it being a 'Fedora
> > feature'. If yo
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 02:00:24PM -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just something I wanted to bring to attention:
> > >
> > > Java 7 is slated for release (after years of h
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:22:08PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 14:00 -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just something I wanted to bring to attention:
> >
> > Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate)
> > on 28 July, 2011.
>
On 09:33:51 Monday 25 July 2011 Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]:
> > Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> > > Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted
> > > to allow for more late work to occur however none of that talk has
> > > tur
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 14:00 -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just something I wanted to bring to attention:
>
> Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate)
> on 28 July, 2011.
> I think this would be an important feature to include for the Fedora
> 16 rele
> I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
> over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine with it...
Please do!
The only work I've done (literally) is on the feature page, but feel
free let me know if you need anything from me.
>This hasn't been debated yet
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted to
> allow for more late work to occur however none of that talk has turned into
> anything solid yet. One point that bears on this is that the Feature Owners
> must be willing to c
* Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]:
> Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> > Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted to
> > allow for more late work to occur however none of that talk has turned into
> > anything solid yet. One point that bears on this is
* Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-25 15:18]:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]:
> > > The alpha change deadline is a week and three days away so this is very
> > > likely too late. If you want to try to get an exception to get this
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]:
> > The alpha change deadline is a week and three days away so this is very
> > likely too late. If you want to try to get an exception to get this in, you
> > need to get the Java SIG excited to
* Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 02:00:24PM -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just something I wanted to bring to attention:
> >
> > Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate)
> > on 28 July, 2011.
> > I think this wou
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 02:00:24PM -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just something I wanted to bring to attention:
>
> Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate)
> on 28 July, 2011.
> I think this would be an important feature to include for the Fedora
>
Hi,
Just something I wanted to bring to attention:
Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate)
on 28 July, 2011.
I think this would be an important feature to include for the Fedora
16 release, and the months between Java's release and Fedora 16's 25
October release wou
32 matches
Mail list logo
