Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
LLVM is becoming an increasingly integral part of our distribution
(with mesa now using it to build the LLVMpipe renderer, for example)
that I don't really feel comfortable maintaining it mostly by myself.
I'm not sure how much help I'd be with maintaining the
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:48:42AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On 05/13/2012 02:02 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
snip
From a purely practical perspective, the popularity of OS X as a
development platform means that we're likely to see a gradual increase
in the amount of code written to
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 12:21 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Apart from the worrying test suite results on secondary archs,
actually it's the libstdc++ issue that's causing the most headache.
How much effort does it take to maintain a compatibility version of
libstdc++? It'd make clang
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 01:33:46AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
We could. Right now, for ARM (as an example), there is really about as
much representation as x86 from what I can see in terms of core arch
support. I'm sure upstream bits will be pulled in, and David and ajax
will do a great job -
On 05/13/2012 02:02 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
snip
From a purely practical perspective, the popularity of OS X as a
development platform means that we're likely to see a gradual increase
in the amount of code written to assume LLVM-specific functionality.
People are just going to have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/11/2012 02:16 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On 05/10/2012 04:56 AM, David Airlie wrote:
Don't confuse llvm and clang, llvm has no equivalent in gcc
world, clang is a C compiler like gcc that uses llvm tech.
Right so I wasn't confusing these :)
Maybe we should draw more of a distinction between LLVM and clang,
and use ExclusiveArch: on the latter to whitelist only architectures
we feel comfortable supporting?
That would only make it worse, for surely x86-32 and x86-64 would be
whitelisted, so most developers would just use clang
On 05/13/2012 01:21 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
snip
Maybe we should draw more of a distinction between LLVM and clang, and
use ExclusiveArch: on the latter to whitelist only architectures we
feel comfortable supporting?
We could. Right now, for ARM (as an example), there is really
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:17 AM, DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com wrote:
Is LLVMpipe needed on, say, ARM? (Does anyone have a screenshot of
GNOME Shell running on such a system?).
Is this close enough?
http://www.delorie.com/arm/f15-gnome-on-olpc.jpg
And currently OLPC uses gnome-panel although
- Original Message -
From: Jon Masters j...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Michel Alexandre Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 10:57:30 PM
Subject: Re: Like C++? Not afraid of quirky build
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 18:00 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Putting that another way, if we carried eglibc in Fedora, there would be
cries and shouts if a large number of packages started requiring it
because we have folks that maintain GLIBC.
I don't believe this is entirely accurate, since glibc
Is this close enough?
http://www.delorie.com/arm/f15-gnome-on-olpc.jpg
That's GDM, and so useless unto the purpose. It's not accelerated.
I could log in and got the fallback shell, but it all worked
sufficiently well.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 13:40 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Is this close enough?
http://www.delorie.com/arm/f15-gnome-on-olpc.jpg
That's GDM, and so useless unto the purpose. It's not accelerated.
I could log in and got the fallback shell, but it all worked
sufficiently well.
Yes,
: Re: Like C++? Not afraid of quirky build systems? Seeking LLVM
co-maintainers
On 05/06/2012 02:29 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
LLVM is becoming an increasingly integral part of our distribution
(with mesa now using it to build the LLVMpipe renderer, for
example)
that I don't
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 13:40 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Is this close enough?
http://www.delorie.com/arm/f15-gnome-on-olpc.jpg
That's GDM, and so useless unto the purpose. It's not accelerated.
I could log in and got the fallback shell, but it all worked
sufficiently well.
Yes.
On 05/06/2012 02:29 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
LLVM is becoming an increasingly integral part of our distribution
(with mesa now using it to build the LLVMpipe renderer, for example)
that I don't really feel comfortable maintaining it mostly by myself.
Thanks for the private email
On 05/09/2012 05:57 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
More broadly though, I feel that GCC is well represented in terms of
engineering knowledge but I'm *concerned* that we run the risk of
growing a dependence on LLVM that is more critical than the LLVMpipe
stuff. Before we can blink, we might need LLVM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/10/2012 05:00 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On 05/09/2012 05:57 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
More broadly though, I feel that GCC is well represented in terms
of engineering knowledge but I'm *concerned* that we run the risk
of growing a dependence on
Is LLVMpipe needed on, say, ARM? (Does anyone have a screenshot of
GNOME Shell running on such a system?).
Is this close enough?
http://www.delorie.com/arm/f15-gnome-on-olpc.jpg
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 23:17 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Is LLVMpipe needed on, say, ARM? (Does anyone have a screenshot of
GNOME Shell running on such a system?).
Is this close enough?
http://www.delorie.com/arm/f15-gnome-on-olpc.jpg
That's GDM, and so useless unto the purpose. It's not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
LLVM is becoming an increasingly integral part of our distribution
(with mesa now using it to build the LLVMpipe renderer, for example)
that I don't really feel comfortable maintaining it mostly by myself.
I'd love to have some extra help
2012/5/6 Michel Alexandre Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org:
Hi all,
LLVM is becoming an increasingly integral part of our distribution
(with mesa now using it to build the LLVMpipe renderer, for example)
that I don't really feel comfortable maintaining it mostly by myself.
I'd love to have
22 matches
Mail list logo
