On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:52:17 +0100
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
Le 13/12/2012 18:32, Honza Horak a écrit :
1. continue shipping only mysql
2. ship mysql + mariadb, that would conflict
Seems ok for 1 release.
3. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names and using
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes:
I think I am with Remi on the above... shipping both for 1 release
would be potentially helpful in seeing issues, we can ask people to
migrate at that time and file bugs, if the bugs are stoppers they can
go back to mysql until fixed. I guess it depends on
On 10/29/2012 04:36 AM, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:31:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things
require mysql-libs, and even mysql-server is required for Akonadi, and
mysql-embedded or Amarok), why isn't the
Le 13/12/2012 18:32, Honza Horak a écrit :
1. continue shipping only mysql
2. ship mysql + mariadb, that would conflict
Seems ok for 1 release.
3. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names and using alternatives
4. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names but not using alternatives
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
So IMO I think now that we can accept different database tools into
repo,it's available for us to include mariadb.Official says they will try to
become a independent software but not a mod based on MySQL...
Maybe easy
I just found this.
https://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-1000-changelog
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
I just found this.
https://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-1000-changelog
Nice find. Are you suggesting anything?
--
It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for;
it's just given. Respect isn't
So IMO I think now that we can accept different database tools into
repo,it's available for us to include mariadb.Official says they will try
to become a independent software but not a mod based on MySQL...
Maybe easy for review? I don't know exactly...
--
devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875150
Spec URL: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mariadb.spec
SRPM URL: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/
--
It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for;
it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned!
Renich
On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sven Lankes wrote:
mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
be interesting.
Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2012 01:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sven Lankes wrote:
mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this
Am 30.10.2012 01:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sven Lankes wrote:
mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
be interesting.
Uh, conflicting with MySQL is
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 02:03 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2012 01:58, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Well, we could also take the approach we take with MTAs; have a set of
generic virtual Provides for MySQL-alikes and have all the
Am 30.10.2012 01:58, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Well, we could also take the approach we take with MTAs; have a set of
generic virtual Provides for MySQL-alikes and have all the MySQL-alikes
we package Provide these, as well as Providing
Am 30.10.2012 02:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
don't get me wrong but where is subtlety necessary here?
* mysql-libs is a widely used and linked library
* postfix/sendmail/exim is a binary with alternative symlinks
different worlds
different implications
You're entirely missing the
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net writes:
i doubt MariaDb would be interface-compatible in most cases
BUT not binary comatible as you can also not replace MySQL 5.1
against MySQL 5.5 without compat-packages (remi did outside
fedora-packages) as long depending packages are linked against
a
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 21:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net writes:
i doubt MariaDb would be interface-compatible in most cases
BUT not binary comatible as you can also not replace MySQL 5.1
against MySQL 5.5 without compat-packages (remi did outside
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 02:14 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2012 02:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
don't get me wrong but where is subtlety necessary here?
* mysql-libs is a widely used and linked library
* postfix/sendmail/exim is a binary with alternative symlinks
different
Am 30.10.2012 02:21, schrieb Tom Lane:
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net writes:
i doubt MariaDb would be interface-compatible in most cases
BUT not binary comatible as you can also not replace MySQL 5.1
against MySQL 5.5 without compat-packages (remi did outside
fedora-packages) as long
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:08:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sven Lankes wrote:
mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
be interesting.
Uh,
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 19:03 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:08:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sven Lankes wrote:
mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
which is usually not
Hello,
I am to start packaging MariaDB for Fedora.
Is there anyone who wants to co-maintain?
This is just me wanting to post it for a package review.
--
It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for;
it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned!
Renich Bon
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:52:18PM -0600, Renich Bon Ciric wrote:
Hi,
I am to start packaging MariaDB for Fedora.
I've promised monty to get going with packaging MariaDB and I did
create some local test packages which do work still need quite a
few changes. I got busy with $dayjob for a while
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Sven Lankes s...@lank.es wrote:
Hi,
I am to start packaging MariaDB for Fedora.
I've promised monty to get going with packaging MariaDB and I did
create some local test packages which do work still need quite a
few changes. I got busy with $dayjob for a
Sven Lankes wrote:
mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
be interesting.
Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things
require mysql-libs, and even mysql-server is required for
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things
require mysql-libs, and even mysql-server is required for Akonadi, and
mysql-embedded or Amarok), why isn't the fork renaming its stuff? If the
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:31:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things
require mysql-libs, and even mysql-server is required for Akonadi, and
mysql-embedded or Amarok), why isn't the fork renaming its stuff? If the
idea is
Sorry,I want to know why should we talk about MySQLMariaDB team has
already posted [1] about MariaDB10.0...They said they don't just want to
become a 'brunch' of MySQL.
[1]--- https://blog.mariadb.org/mariadb-directions/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
28 matches
Mail list logo
