On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:24:13AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:46 AM Adam Samalik wrote:
> >
> > Some modules now use "latest", "stable", or "master" as stream names for
> > various different things. It's quite confusing and I want to fix that.
> >
> > Without
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 3:59 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:24:13AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > Without naming them, I see two different use cases:
> > > 1/ "for end users" — rolling stream meant for end users to consume,
> likely used in projects without
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 3:55 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:25:36AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > So the question is, do people agree there are two? Or just one? Or
> more?
> > > Upstreams aren't consistent. There's a good argument for making our
> branches
> > >
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:24:13AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Without naming them, I see two different use cases:
> > 1/ "for end users" — rolling stream meant for end users to consume, likely
> > used in projects without traditional versioning scheme, or for the latest
> > version that
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:25:36AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > So the question is, do people agree there are two? Or just one? Or more?
> > Upstreams aren't consistent. There's a good argument for making our branches
> > match the pratices of upstreams -- but when two different upstreams
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 9:23 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:44:43PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> > So the question is, do people agree there are two? Or just one? Or more?
>
> Upstreams aren't consistent. There's a good argument for making our branches
> match the pratices
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:46 AM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
> Some modules now use "latest", "stable", or "master" as stream names for
> various different things. It's quite confusing and I want to fix that.
>
> Without naming them, I see two different use cases:
>
> 1/ "for end users" — rolling
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:44:43PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> So the question is, do people agree there are two? Or just one? Or more?
Upstreams aren't consistent. There's a good argument for making our branches
match the pratices of upstreams -- but when two different upstreams think
different
Some modules now use "latest", "stable", or "master" as stream names for
various different things. It's quite confusing and I want to fix that.
Without naming them, I see two different use cases:
1/ "for end users" — rolling stream meant for end users to consume, likely
used in projects without
