Re: Nautilus usability

just as a side note, Nautilus usability is greatly improving and i guess i am part of many users who still need a fm and are very happy to see efforts beeing done on this app. Also, files operation popover was a great add on. Sorry for the noise

Re: Nautilus usability

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:16:57 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 11/29/2016 09:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > About gnome bugzilla: > > Once I had reported a bug in gnome-software, and it took almost a year for > > someone to respond at all. > > Really? I fixed the bug 2 days after you had

Re: Nautilus usability

On 11/29/2016 09:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > About gnome bugzilla: > Once I had reported a bug in gnome-software, and it took almost a year for > someone to respond at all. Really? I fixed the bug 2 days after you had filed it, https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748582 -- Kalev

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:46:11 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > >> > There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy >> > with >> > the feature set, or else I cannot explain why this progress window >>

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:32:01 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I don't think this line of conversation is going to be particularly > productive. Not for Nautilus, that's true. There are competitive file managers, however. And simply filing an RFE isn't productive either, if there are no free

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 09:08:28PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy > > > with the feature set, or else I cannot explain why this progress > > > window feature has been created exactly like this. > > You are just making

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:51:14 -, carlos.sorian...@gmail.com wrote: > "There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy with > the feature set" > We are never completely happy, after all we are quite demanding. > However there are few reasons why it's not excellent for your use

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:46:11 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy > > with > > the feature set, or else I cannot explain why this progress window > > feature has been created exactly like this. > > You are just making assumptions

Re: Nautilus usability

Hi, Going to ask here to the whole thread. "Some cancelled tasks say Cancelled. Other cancelled tasks look like they're paused, with their most recent state during copy frozen in time, how many files copied," https://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/commit/?id=d4a4f7915ccad4fbe9bb72

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 14:40 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:26:50 +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > > I'm missing a link to a bug report here. > > Blame the bad experience I've made with tickets at > bugzilla.gnome.org. > > There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus

Re: Nautilus usability

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:26:50 +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > I'm missing a link to a bug report here. Blame the bad experience I've made with tickets at bugzilla.gnome.org. There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy with the feature set, or else I cannot explain why this

Re: Nautilus usability

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:20:18 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > And what does that have to do with the progress window issue? > > Sorry for taking the thread off-track. I had accidentally deleted the > original message and thought there was something about multiple copies > taking a long time as

Re: Nautilus usability

On 11/28/2016 03:22 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 20:23:31 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: An SSD drive might not have this problem, but a spinning disk definitely will. You should never try running multiple copies on the same disk if you want it to finish in a reasonable time.

Re: Nautilus usability

Michael Schwendt píše v Ne 27. 11. 2016 v 00:53 +0100: > This is about F25 and F24, but likely applies to older releases, too, > since I haven't noticed any improvements about it. > > Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then > started a similar task for other

Re: Nautilus usability

On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 20:23:31 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > An SSD drive might not have this problem, but a spinning disk definitely > will. You should never try running multiple copies on the same disk if > you want it to finish in a reasonable time. With one copy, you can do > long contiguous

Re: Nautilus usability

On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 20:58:45 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Chris Murphy > > wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Michael Schwendt

Re: Nautilus usability

On 11/28/2016 07:53 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/27/2016 10:40 PM, drago01 wrote: >> On Monday, November 28, 2016, Py > >> wrote: >> >An SSD drive might not have this problem, but a spinning disk >> >definitely >> >will. You should never try

Re: Nautilus usability

On 11/27/2016 10:40 PM, drago01 wrote: On Monday, November 28, 2016, Py > wrote: >>> Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then >>> started a similar task for other directories while Nautilus was >still >>> working

Re: Nautilus usability

On Monday, November 28, 2016, Py wrote: > > > > >>> Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then > >>> started a similar task for other directories while Nautilus was > >still > >>> working on the first task? > >> > >> A directory containing 10,000 1MiB

Re: Nautilus usability

>>> Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then >>> started a similar task for other directories while Nautilus was >still >>> working on the first task? >> >> A directory containing 10,000 1MiB files moved to another directory >> completes immediately. Copying takes a

Re: Nautilus usability

On 11/27/2016 07:07 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Michael Schwendt > wrote: This is about F25 and F24, but likely applies to older releases, too, since I haven't noticed any improvements about it. Have you ever made

Re: Nautilus usability

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Michael Schwendt >> wrote: >>> On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 15:07:20 +, Chris Murphy

Re: Nautilus usability

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 15:07:20 +, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >>> A directory containing 10,000 1MiB files moved to another directory >>>

Re: Nautilus usability

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 15:07:20 +, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> A directory containing 10,000 1MiB files moved to another directory >> completes immediately. > > The target directory may be a different partition or a

Re: Nautilus usability

On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 15:07:20 +, Chris Murphy wrote: > A directory containing 10,000 1MiB files moved to another directory > completes immediately. The target directory may be a different partition or a network mount. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Nautilus usability

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > This is about F25 and F24, but likely applies to older releases, too, > since I haven't noticed any improvements about it. > > Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then > started a similar

Nautilus usability

This is about F25 and F24, but likely applies to older releases, too, since I haven't noticed any improvements about it. Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then started a similar task for other directories while Nautilus was still working on the first task? What