On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 14:52 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Real numbers before bald assertions please :-)
I resign!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 15:52, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> Real numbers before bald assertions please :-)
Sorry I thought this was devel@lists.fedoraproject.org where fact was
not needed and very much disdained :)
I realized I have jumped onto the hype train of javascript programming
where suppo
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:49:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:35 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > Dne 31.8.2011 19:31, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
> > > they all came from the same version of upstream jquery. And delivering
> > > just one large jquery that can be used
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:35:50PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> * dojo/dijit - F/OSS, packaged
>
Currently for any javascript library you are allowed to bundle. In the
future this may not be the case so you may have a lot of work to do to
maintain this application in the future. Note that
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:35 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 31.8.2011 19:31, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
> > they all came from the same version of upstream jquery. And delivering
> > just one large jquery that can be used is not going to fit what either
> > upstreams, web developers OR their us
Dne 31.8.2011 19:31, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
> they all came from the same version of upstream jquery. And delivering
> just one large jquery that can be used is not going to fit what either
> upstreams, web developers OR their users want or need.
I still haven't got the reason why jQuery
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:23:56AM -0700, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:46:36PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:52 +0200, Remi wrote:
>> > > >From :
>> > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:23:56AM -0700, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:46:36PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:52 +0200, Remi wrote:
> > > >From :
> > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
> > >
> >
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:46:36PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:52 +0200, Remi wrote:
> > >From :
> > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
> >
> > "At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is
> > sp
Dne 31.8.2011 13:12, Mattias Ellert napsal(a):
> At the moment jquery is not package as a separate package. If it was
> packagers could replace them with a symlink to that.
Help us to finish https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=nodejs and
you can get https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
ons 2011-08-31 klockan 10:17 +0300 skrev Yanko Kaneti:
> # repoquery -f '*/jquery*.js' --qf="%{NAME}\n" | sort | uniq | wc -l
> 356
>
> jQuery FTW :)
Most of these are probably doxygen generated documentation. Recent
versions of doxygen provides a search option for the generated html
documentati
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 23:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:52 +0200, Remi wrote:
> > >From :
> > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
> >
> > "At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is
> > specifica
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:52 +0200, Remi wrote:
> >From :
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
>
> "At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is
> specifically exempted from this but this will likely change in the future."
>
>From :
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
"At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is specifically
exempted from this but this will likely change in the future."
This explain why so much .js libraries are bundled in so mu
Speaking about prototype and scriptaculous, I am sure that they are
bundled also in Rails and if there are some Rails applications packaged,
they will be included also in them. However I am not sure if they should
be packaged separately or just copylibs.
Vit
Dne 31.8.2011 06:35, Adam William
Hey, all. So, I'm looking at packaging tt-rss - an RSS reader
implemented as a PHP webapp - for Fedora, since I run it on my own
server. It became rapidly clear that it's a landmine of bundled PHP
libraries and snippets and uncertain licensing. I'm unsure which of the
things it bundles would be lik
16 matches
Mail list logo
