- Original Message -
I would say this one https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/1351 is important
for us
as packagers. It makes me nervous/upset and sad altogether :-).
Awesome, well that’s on the list for 1.6 so that should be the next feature
release
of pip.
Cool, thanks a lot!
On Mar 25, 2014, at 2:59 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
I would say this one https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/1351 is important
for us
as packagers. It makes me nervous/upset and sad altogether :-).
Awesome, well that’s on the list for 1.6 so
On Mar 25, 2014, at 8:52 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Has this critical pip issue been addressed?
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-February/162518.html
Not that i’m aware of, although it’s actually an issue where distutils and
setuptools supports
two
On Mar 24, 2014, at 5:38 AM, Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Donald,
welcome to our mailing list.
- Original Message -
From: Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io
To: python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:19:49 PM
Subject: PEP453 // ensurepip
Hey there,
So I’m one of the authors of PEP453, the original implementor of ensurepip, and
a pip maintainer. I know that pip (and other language level package managers)
have a sort of love/hate (sometimes more of one or the other!) relationship
with the downstream Linux packagers. I know that
